Luc as trade bait

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Luc as trade bait

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

I know I stated yesterday that I don't generally participate in trade threads, but it's different when a deal or an individual has been specifically mentioned in a rumor. Zgoda today tweeted that he believes Luc is the most likely Wolf to be traded before the approaching deadline. I know I am a Zgoda detractor, but he does hear talk every day that we aren't privy to, and this theory actually makes sense to me. Adelman is an offensive coach, and as such, hasn't given Luc much of a shot. But he is far and away the best defender on the club. Last night was a great example...when Corey picked up his 4th foul early in the third quarter and Luc replaced him, Houston didn't score for the next 6-7 minutes. His defensive footwork is about the best in the league in my opinion. A shutdown defender isn't as valuable to playoff missers like the Kings and the Wolves, but might be an attractive target for a team trying to fine tune their roster for the playoffs. Especially a team that is looking ahead to trying to stop Durant, or James, or George in the playoffs, and see Luc as potentially a valuable asset in this quest.

Makes a lot of sense. Maybe this was Flip's thought process...get rid of the difficult-to-deal Williams, and pick up somebody that is likely to be more marketable at trade deadline time. Which playoff team might be looking for a defensive stopper, and has something to offer that could help us long term?
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by thedoper »

Not exactly exciting, but I want a deal. Just something to change our outlook for the rest of the year.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

I'd have a hard time believing that a part-time rotation guy would bring much in return. I hear what you're saying about his potential impact on a playoff team, but would you give up much for him? I know I wouldn't for the few minutes he'd be worth each game.
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:I'd have a hard time believing that a part-time rotation guy would bring much in return. I hear what you're saying about his potential impact on a playoff team, but would you give up much for him? I know I wouldn't for the few minutes he'd be worth each game.

I don't know what they could offer, but Indiana could potentially be trying to stop Lebron in the East final and Durant in the championship. Since they may have home court advantage the entire playoffs and only need to win at home, they might overpay for a stopper who could limit Lebron/Durant's effectiveness after the Pacers jump off to leads at home. Just playing here. Most trade threads offer up the usual trash: JJ, Dante, Shved,etc, but we know nobody really wants those guys. I can see Zgoda's point that Luc is the best asset we have that we would be willing to part with.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

It's simple. We'll ship Mbah a Moute to Golden State for Harrison Barnes. Everyone wins. :thumb:
User avatar
A Friendly Flatulence [enjin:8907904]
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by A Friendly Flatulence [enjin:8907904] »

For Otto Porter, Washington trying to make some noise in the east
User avatar
worldK
Posts: 3461
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by worldK »

Camden wrote:It's simple. We'll ship Mbah a Moute to Golden State for Harrison Barnes. Everyone wins. :thumb:


Golden state would never do that. They have iggy as their premiere wing defender. They see barnes as a defender as well and a guy who can contribute offensively as well. Luc brings nothing to them but additional salary.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

worldK wrote:
Camden wrote:It's simple. We'll ship Mbah a Moute to Golden State for Harrison Barnes. Everyone wins. :thumb:


Golden state would never do that. They have iggy as their premiere wing defender. They see barnes as a defender as well and a guy who can contribute offensively as well. Luc brings nothing to them but additional salary.


I thought the thumbs up face was clear that I was kidding lol. My fault worldK. Wishful thinking all the way with that trade.
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

A Friendly Flatulence wrote:For Otto Porter, Washington trying to make some noise in the east

It's not going to happen, but it's a really interesting thought, ff. Washington needs someone to stop George and/or Lebron, and while Ariza is known as a very good team defense guy, he isn't a very good on-the-ball defender. Luc could be effective off the bench against those guys. And Porter is looking like a major draft bust...1.7 PPG on 30% shooting! The Wolves would do it, thinking that a change in location could turn the 3rd pick in the draft around.

The reason it doesn't happen is that the Washington fans would revolt. Porter was a local star at Georgetown, and it's too early to give up on him. It would be interesting, though, if Luc was traded for two epic top three pick busts in one year!
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Luc as trade bait

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

There is no such thing as a draft bust after half a season in the pros. Maybe retro-actively he can be considered a bust in 2-3 years if he does nothing, but 4-5 months is way too quick to be calling someone a bust especially on an epic level. That becomes even more true when you factor in how weak the draft was considered to be to begin with. There's a reason NBA prime years happen between 27-31 for most players and not between 19-22.
Post Reply