Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8173
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Post by bleedspeed »

I always liked Ridnour. It is to bad we couldn't have signed him as our backup PG this year.
User avatar
Papalrep
Posts: 1070
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Post by Papalrep »

Millsap would help us. We wont get Aldridge without a max offer sheet
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1843
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Post by TheGrey08 »

Q12543 wrote:
Hicks123 wrote:Lot's of PF available next year if you have the dough. Love (if he opts out....which he may), Aldridge, Millsap, Tristan Thompson.


Yeah, not to mention all the lunchpail types that will be available and can at least bang around in the paint and play with some level of competence. We may not be in a position to throw money at an RFA or highly sought-after FA, so it may not be a problem we can solve this offseason. By the way, we likely will need a backup PG as well, as Mo is only on a one-year deal and LaVine simply has no business playing that position. So there is that hole to fill too.

Our focus should be on getting the best player out of the draft possible and then seeing if there are any low-cost/high-value vets that can help fill in the gaps.

Or flip the pick & other filler for a good vet that actually FITS with all the young talent. Ideally a PF.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

"Or flip the pick & other filler for a good vet that actually FITS with all the young talent. Ideally a PF."

No thanks. I'd like to grow a young nucleus together; one that wants to stay together. Ideally, Rubio-Wiggins-Muhammad-Towns-Dieng with LaVine as our combo guard off the bench.
Post Reply