Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520]
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520] »

longstrangetrip wrote:Swift, strong punishment doled out by Silver and the NBA...quite impressive. Lifetime ban, and a forced sale if 3/4 of owners vote for it.

So, it looks like the Clippers are going to need new ownership. which leads to a huge opportunity for............US! That's right, let's pool our board resources and buy the Clippers (might have to get a bank involved too :)) . Then we move the franchise to Minneapolis and appeal to get the Laker name back. If the LA Lakers refuse to give up their name, then we call our new franchise The Minneapolis Authentic Lakers. We already know the talent on this board so we will share the GM duties, using number of posts as the number of votes each co-owner gets. We will be the best run franchise in the league and dominate for years!

Who's IN?????????

longstrangetrip wrote:Swift, strong punishment doled out by Silver and the NBA...quite impressive. Lifetime ban, and a forced sale if 3/4 of owners vote for it.

So, it looks like the Clippers are going to need new ownership. which leads to a huge opportunity for............US! That's right, let's pool our board resources and buy the Clippers (might have to get a bank involved too :)) . Then we move the franchise to Minneapolis and appeal to get the Laker name back. If the LA Lakers refuse to give up their name, then we call our new franchise The Minneapolis Authentic Lakers. We already know the talent on this board so we will share the GM duties, using number of posts as the number of votes each co-owner gets. We will be the best run franchise in the league and dominate for years!

Who's IN?????????


Wow, lifetime ban. Al Sharpton (aka the voice of all black people) can go home now and wait for the next incident.

I think it's also funny how Elgin Baylor sued Sterling for wrongful termination or something to that effect after he was the face of the NBA lottery for what seemed like 10 straight years.

Not defending Sterling, just think a lifetime ban was a bit of an overreaction.
mjs34
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by mjs34 »

I think the lifetime ban was used to soften the blow for the owners to vote for the sale. He is essentially already out of the NBA so forcing the sale doesn't seem so extreme.

I do wonder what happens when a player is caught on tape making racist remarks. Will the players union push for a lifetime ban? I'll bet not, considering they have taken the players side every time against the NBA and commissioner regardless of the infraction. I still don't understand how words are somehow more important than actions.
User avatar
Hicks123 [enjin:6700838]
Posts: 931
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by Hicks123 [enjin:6700838] »

Wow, what a penalty for Sterling! He is "forced" to sell a franchise for what is valued at $575M. Guess what he paid for the same franchise in 1981....$12M! Wow, way to strong arm him into a profit of $560M! That will really show the guy not to mess with Silver!
User avatar
kms789 [enjin:6694798]
Posts: 164
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by kms789 [enjin:6694798] »

Hicks123 wrote:Wow, what a penalty for Sterling! He is "forced" to sell a franchise for what is valued at $575M. Guess what he paid for the same franchise in 1981....$12M! Wow, way to strong arm him into a profit of $560M! That will really show the guy not to mess with Silver!


Simmons and Woj both think it'd sell for upward of $1.5bil. Makes sense considering no NBA team has ever sold for its actual worth
mjs34
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by mjs34 »

Hicks123 wrote:Wow, what a penalty for Sterling! He is "forced" to sell a franchise for what is valued at $575M. Guess what he paid for the same franchise in 1981....$12M! Wow, way to strong arm him into a profit of $560M! That will really show the guy not to mess with Silver!


What did you want them to do?
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

BizarroJerry wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:Swift, strong punishment doled out by Silver and the NBA...quite impressive. Lifetime ban, and a forced sale if 3/4 of owners vote for it.

So, it looks like the Clippers are going to need new ownership. which leads to a huge opportunity for............US! That's right, let's pool our board resources and buy the Clippers (might have to get a bank involved too :)) . Then we move the franchise to Minneapolis and appeal to get the Laker name back. If the LA Lakers refuse to give up their name, then we call our new franchise The Minneapolis Authentic Lakers. We already know the talent on this board so we will share the GM duties, using number of posts as the number of votes each co-owner gets. We will be the best run franchise in the league and dominate for years!

Who's IN?????????

longstrangetrip wrote:Swift, strong punishment doled out by Silver and the NBA...quite impressive. Lifetime ban, and a forced sale if 3/4 of owners vote for it.

So, it looks like the Clippers are going to need new ownership. which leads to a huge opportunity for............US! That's right, let's pool our board resources and buy the Clippers (might have to get a bank involved too :)) . Then we move the franchise to Minneapolis and appeal to get the Laker name back. If the LA Lakers refuse to give up their name, then we call our new franchise The Minneapolis Authentic Lakers. We already know the talent on this board so we will share the GM duties, using number of posts as the number of votes each co-owner gets. We will be the best run franchise in the league and dominate for years!

Who's IN?????????


Wow, lifetime ban. Al Sharpton (aka the voice of all black people) can go home now and wait for the next incident.

I think it's also funny how Elgin Baylor sued Sterling for wrongful termination or something to that effect after he was the face of the NBA lottery for what seemed like 10 straight years.

Not defending Sterling, just think a lifetime ban was a bit of an overreaction.

Take a good look at Sterling...a lifetime ban may only be 2-3 years!
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

I think the NBA overreacted to this whole thing. Lifetime ban? Really? There's people comparing this whole thing to MLK and even Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in baseball... ABSURD!
mjs34
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by mjs34 »

Camden wrote:I think the NBA overreacted to this whole thing. Lifetime ban? Really? There's people comparing this whole thing to MLK and even Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in baseball... ABSURD!


I just hope all those clippers players can get through this! Maybe some free therapy.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

sjm34 wrote:
Camden wrote:I think the NBA overreacted to this whole thing. Lifetime ban? Really? There's people comparing this whole thing to MLK and even Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in baseball... ABSURD!


I just hope all those clippers players can get through this! Maybe some free therapy.


All those Clippers players that were more than happy to collect Sterling's money over the last however many years. Suddenly they're distraught? I don't buy it.
User avatar
The Rage Monster [enjin:8010341]
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hypocrisy involved with Sterling's comments

Post by The Rage Monster [enjin:8010341] »

I don't think he'll end up being forced to sell the team, it's just such a dangerous road for them to go down. In principle ousting an owner based on private comments he made that the public doesn't agree with just seems like a terrible precedent to set.
Post Reply