Hornets at Wolves GDT

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
Post Reply
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 8221
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by 60WinTim »

We begin a 4-game stretch against 4 of the bottom 7 teams in the standings. If we stay true to our new mantra of beating the teams we are supposed to beat, we should be taking a 4-game win streak in to OKC for a rematch everyone is looking forward to after pissing away the last game against OKC.

But first things first, beat the Hornets. Conley is resting tonight, so I assume we will see NAW start in his place, and we ought to get a lot of minutes from Jmac as well. I assume LaMelo plays tonight after his recent return from injury. As I recall he really did a number on us last season coming out of the all-star break, causing Q to lose all hope. Hopefully there is not repeat of that tonight!
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by thedoper »

Go Wolves!!! I am personally thankful I had to miss that last OKC Game. I dont think my emotions could have endured a 14pt 4th quarter.
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 8221
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by 60WinTim »

thedoper wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:49 pm Go Wolves!!! I am personally thankful I had to miss that last OKC Game. I dont think my emotions could have endured a 14pt 4th quarter.
That's funny, I just went back and re-watched crunchtime! :D

KAT was really bad. 3 fouls and an ill-advised attempt to float a lob pass to Rudy when he could just put the ball in the hoop.

On another note, ANT is now listed as questionable with an illness...
User avatar
Q-is-here
Posts: 7578
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by Q-is-here »

60WinTim wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:24 pm We begin a 4-game stretch against 4 of the bottom 7 teams in the standings. If we stay true to our new mantra of beating the teams we are supposed to beat, we should be taking a 4-game win streak in to OKC for a rematch everyone is looking forward to after pissing away the last game against OKC.

But first things first, beat the Hornets. Conley is resting tonight, so I assume we will see NAW start in his place, and we ought to get a lot of minutes from Jmac as well. I assume LaMelo plays tonight after his recent return from injury. As I recall he really did a number on us last season coming out of the all-star break, causing Q to lose all hope. Hopefully there is not repeat of that tonight!
Yeah, I think it was either a Hornets or Wizards game that broke me last year, at least until the playoffs. I was disgusted. It's a different story this year......so far.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14517
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by kekgeek »

Finch said Conley is more out because of his hamstring than rest
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 8221
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by 60WinTim »

But ANT is in. Same starting lineup as in Boston.

Shall we play a drinking game? A shot per turnover? :mrgreen:
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Our Public Address announcer is so bad. The post with the most? Is that the best you can do?
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 8221
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by 60WinTim »

The Fro is back!
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

60WinTim wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:00 pm But ANT is in. Same starting lineup as in Boston.

Shall we play a drinking game? A shot per turnover? :mrgreen:
1
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 8221
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Hornets at Wolves GDT

Post by 60WinTim »

Close to a second shot, but we recovered. But a couple possessions later we made good on the second.

Anyone else think ANT is in the penalty box? Like he is not allowed to drive? Wonder how many quarters that will last for…
Post Reply