Rudy Gobert Contract

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
WildWolf2813
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by WildWolf2813 »

Lipoli390 wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2024 4:20 pm
WildWolf2813 wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2024 5:18 pm
Lipoli390 wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 11:47 pm

Yes. Just stepping back and looking at this objectively, the logic takes me to where you’ve been at for a while. The one caveat is that there could always be a team out there with some cap space that sees KAT as a big needle mover for them — someone who could substantially elevate their status from playoff team to contender.
Those teams are either deep into the process of a rebuild-- like the Nets or are teams that will do what they can to stay competitive, but hate KAT's guts, like Miami and Golden State.
Miami and Golden State hate KAT? That doesn’t make any sense. Front office execs want players they believe can help them win. KAT was the best player on a 46-win Wolves team two years ago. He was instrumental in getting the Wolves into the play-in series when he returned from injury the next season. He was terrible in the Dallas series, but he was a key reason the Wolves won 56 games last season and made it to the Western Conference Finals. He’s an all-star caliber big and great offensive player with a 40% three-point shot. To top it all off, he’s become a good defender. And of course, he’s a model citizen with no baggage. Given all that, I doubt there are any teams that hate him and there are undoubtedly teams that really like him. At the same time, KAT is not a superstar but has a superstar contract.

I think Cool’s point, and I agree, is that KAT’s contract makes it difficult to trade him for the combination of cap relief and assets we’d want in return. To optimize his trade value, we would have had to trade him two or three years ago. My point is that there MIGHT be a competitive playoff team not in full rebuild mold who’d be willing to give us a decent return in exchange for KAT. But I think KAT is probably worth more to us as a player than a trade asset at this point.
Draymond and Jimmy are not KAT fans whatsoever. If there was a guy that Ant didn't like, regardless of how good how he is, you know what the Wolves are not gonna do? Pursue him. It goes back to what I've constantly said about Towns. It's less about his game and more about his personality that turns fans and other players off of him.
User avatar
Sundog
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2021 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by Sundog »

This from a recent Hollinger/Athletic article:

“Finally there’s Rudy Gobert in Minnesota. The reigning Defense Player of the Year is technically eligible for a four-year, $243 million extension. No, he’s not getting that. What is interesting is whether the Wolves can slowly land the plane on the back half of his career by signing an extension that massages their impending giant luxury tax bill.

Having Gobert opt out of his $46.7 million due in 2025-26 and extend for a more manageable number over a four-year span is one of the more palatable exits from their current cap situation. But at what number? Something like $100 million in new money would see his cap number dip to $32.5 million in 2025-26, which would almost certainly allow Minnesota to skip the second apron and avoid having its 2033 draft pick frozen.

Of course, they don’t have to do that right now; the two sides could even wait until next summer. But it would be an interesting way for the Wolves to get in front of their financial situation.“
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 7029
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by 60WinTim »

Sundog wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 6:33 am This from a recent Hollinger/Athletic article:

“Finally there’s Rudy Gobert in Minnesota. The reigning Defense Player of the Year is technically eligible for a four-year, $243 million extension. No, he’s not getting that. What is interesting is whether the Wolves can slowly land the plane on the back half of his career by signing an extension that massages their impending giant luxury tax bill.

Having Gobert opt out of his $46.7 million due in 2025-26 and extend for a more manageable number over a four-year span is one of the more palatable exits from their current cap situation. But at what number? Something like $100 million in new money would see his cap number dip to $32.5 million in 2025-26, which would almost certainly allow Minnesota to skip the second apron and avoid having its 2033 draft pick frozen.

Of course, they don’t have to do that right now; the two sides could even wait until next summer. But it would be an interesting way for the Wolves to get in front of their financial situation.“
As I said before, there is a number in the low 30's that not only gets the Wolves under the 2nd apron, but could take them just below the luxury tax! Of course, it would mean not re-signing NAZ and NAW next off-season (assuming NAZ opts out)...
User avatar
Q-is-here
Posts: 5614
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by Q-is-here »

60WinTim wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 7:18 am
Sundog wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 6:33 am This from a recent Hollinger/Athletic article:

“Finally there’s Rudy Gobert in Minnesota. The reigning Defense Player of the Year is technically eligible for a four-year, $243 million extension. No, he’s not getting that. What is interesting is whether the Wolves can slowly land the plane on the back half of his career by signing an extension that massages their impending giant luxury tax bill.

Having Gobert opt out of his $46.7 million due in 2025-26 and extend for a more manageable number over a four-year span is one of the more palatable exits from their current cap situation. But at what number? Something like $100 million in new money would see his cap number dip to $32.5 million in 2025-26, which would almost certainly allow Minnesota to skip the second apron and avoid having its 2033 draft pick frozen.

Of course, they don’t have to do that right now; the two sides could even wait until next summer. But it would be an interesting way for the Wolves to get in front of their financial situation.“
As I said before, there is a number in the low 30's that not only gets the Wolves under the 2nd apron, but could take them just below the luxury tax! Of course, it would mean not re-signing NAZ and NAW next off-season (assuming NAZ opts out)...
This is why the young guys on the current roster matter so much. This offseason will seem like child's play compared to next offseason in terms of backfilling key roles.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15292
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by Lipoli390 »

Sundog wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 6:33 am This from a recent Hollinger/Athletic article:

“Finally there’s Rudy Gobert in Minnesota. The reigning Defense Player of the Year is technically eligible for a four-year, $243 million extension. No, he’s not getting that. What is interesting is whether the Wolves can slowly land the plane on the back half of his career by signing an extension that massages their impending giant luxury tax bill.

Having Gobert opt out of his $46.7 million due in 2025-26 and extend for a more manageable number over a four-year span is one of the more palatable exits from their current cap situation. But at what number? Something like $100 million in new money would see his cap number dip to $32.5 million in 2025-26, which would almost certainly allow Minnesota to skip the second apron and avoid having its 2033 draft pick frozen.

Of course, they don’t have to do that right now; the two sides could even wait until next summer. But it would be an interesting way for the Wolves to get in front of their financial situation.“
I don’t think Hollinger has his math right.

With Rudy and Naz opting in, the Wolves payroll starting the 2025-26 season would be slightly over $209 million. The current second apron is at $188 million. If the Wolves reduce Rudy’s $46 million down to $30 million and Naz exercises his player option at $15 million, the Wolves payroll would be close to $194 million, which would be around $6 million over the current 2nd apron and probably still over the 2nd apron next summer. Moreover, we’d only have 9 roster players adding up to that number - without NAW or Luka Garza. And of course that assumes Naz opts in at $15 million even though his market value will likely be significantly higher. If Naz doesn’t opt in and we let him walk, our payroll would be around $179 million with 6 roster spots to fill. If we filled all 6 with vet minimum guys, which means letting NAW walk, our payroll would be around $191 million - $3 million over the current 2nd apron threshold.

Bottom line is that we can’t realistically keep both Rudy and KAT beyond next season unless Rudy agrees to an extension at a salary substantially below $30 million (way, way below his $46 million opt in). If he agrees to an annual salary of $20 million, then we could possibly keep NAW and stay below the 2nd apron, but we’d lose Naz. To keep all three bigs and have any chance of squeezing in under the 2nd apron, Rudy would have to accept no more than $15 million per year and Naz would have to accept no more than $25 million annually. But it would still be really hard to get under the 2nd apron after filling the remaining roster slots and we’d still lose NAW.

Again, it’s highly unlikely the Wolves keep both Rudy and KAT after next season. I continue to believe the Wolves will trade KAT next summer mainly because Rudy provides what neither Naz nor Garza provides and because TC continues to express his desire to extend Rudy. However, TC said they wanted to re-sign Kyle Anderson for next season; yet they didn’t and it seems clear they didn’t sign him because he wanted a multi-year deal, which would frustrate the team’s ability to get under the 2nd apron. So as much as TC might sincerely say he wants to extend and keep Rudy, the reality of the second apron will likely prevent it unless Rudy is accommodating to an extent that would be highly unusual. Further, the Wolves front office might be prepared to pivot to a more space-and-pace game for Wolves 2.0 with Ant, Jaden, Dilly, TSJ, Naz and KAT. I also think Rudy might land us a better return because of his expiring contract. So I won’t be surprised if the Wolves keep KAT and move Rudy next summer. I WILL be surprised if the Wolves keep both.
User avatar
rapsuperstar31
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by rapsuperstar31 »

Lipoli390 wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 5:56 pm
Sundog wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 6:33 am This from a recent Hollinger/Athletic article:

“Finally there’s Rudy Gobert in Minnesota. The reigning Defense Player of the Year is technically eligible for a four-year, $243 million extension. No, he’s not getting that. What is interesting is whether the Wolves can slowly land the plane on the back half of his career by signing an extension that massages their impending giant luxury tax bill.

Having Gobert opt out of his $46.7 million due in 2025-26 and extend for a more manageable number over a four-year span is one of the more palatable exits from their current cap situation. But at what number? Something like $100 million in new money would see his cap number dip to $32.5 million in 2025-26, which would almost certainly allow Minnesota to skip the second apron and avoid having its 2033 draft pick frozen.

Of course, they don’t have to do that right now; the two sides could even wait until next summer. But it would be an interesting way for the Wolves to get in front of their financial situation.“
I don’t think Hollinger has his math right.

With Rudy and Naz opting in, the Wolves payroll starting the 2025-26 season would be slightly over $209 million. The current second apron is at $188 million. If the Wolves reduce Rudy’s $46 million down to $30 million and Naz exercises his player option at $15 million, the Wolves payroll would be close to $194 million, which would be around $6 million over the current 2nd apron and probably still over the 2nd apron next summer. Moreover, we’d only have 9 roster players adding up to that number - without NAW or Luka Garza. And of course that assumes Naz opts in at $15 million even though his market value will likely be significantly higher. If Naz doesn’t opt in and we let him walk, our payroll would be around $179 million with 6 roster spots to fill. If we filled all 6 with vet minimum guys, which means letting NAW walk, our payroll would be around $191 million - $3 million over the current 2nd apron threshold.

Bottom line is that we can’t realistically keep both Rudy and KAT beyond next season unless Rudy agrees to an extension at a salary substantially below $30 million (way, way below his $46 million opt in). If he agrees to an annual salary of $20 million, then we could possibly keep NAW and stay below the 2nd apron, but we’d lose Naz. To keep all three bigs and have any chance of squeezing in under the 2nd apron, Rudy would have to accept no more than $15 million per year and Naz would have to accept no more than $25 million annually. But it would still be really hard to get under the 2nd apron after filling the remaining roster slots and we’d still lose NAW.

Again, it’s highly unlikely the Wolves keep both Rudy and KAT after next season. I continue to believe the Wolves will trade KAT next summer mainly because Rudy provides what neither Naz nor Garza provides and because TC continues to express his desire to extend Rudy. However, TC said they wanted to re-sign Kyle Anderson for next season; yet they didn’t and it seems clear they didn’t sign him because he wanted a multi-year deal, which would frustrate the team’s ability to get under the 2nd apron. So as much as TC might sincerely say he wants to extend and keep Rudy, the reality of the second apron will likely prevent it unless Rudy is accommodating to an extent that would be highly unusual. Further, the Wolves front office might be prepared to pivot to a more space-and-pace game for Wolves 2.0 with Ant, Jaden, Dilly, TSJ, Naz and KAT. I also think Rudy might land us a better return because of his expiring contract. So I won’t be surprised if the Wolves keep KAT and move Rudy next summer. I WILL be surprised if the Wolves keep both.
I believe with the new tv deal the cap will go up 10% in 25-26 due to the cap smoothing so the 2nd apron should start at 206.8 in 25-26 and another 10% in 26-27 so that should be 227.48 for the 2nd apron. Either way yeah it's going to be hard to give Naz his full value even with Rudy lowering his salary.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by Monster »

rapsuperstar31 wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 6:09 pm
Lipoli390 wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 5:56 pm
Sundog wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 6:33 am This from a recent Hollinger/Athletic article:

“Finally there’s Rudy Gobert in Minnesota. The reigning Defense Player of the Year is technically eligible for a four-year, $243 million extension. No, he’s not getting that. What is interesting is whether the Wolves can slowly land the plane on the back half of his career by signing an extension that massages their impending giant luxury tax bill.

Having Gobert opt out of his $46.7 million due in 2025-26 and extend for a more manageable number over a four-year span is one of the more palatable exits from their current cap situation. But at what number? Something like $100 million in new money would see his cap number dip to $32.5 million in 2025-26, which would almost certainly allow Minnesota to skip the second apron and avoid having its 2033 draft pick frozen.

Of course, they don’t have to do that right now; the two sides could even wait until next summer. But it would be an interesting way for the Wolves to get in front of their financial situation.“
I don’t think Hollinger has his math right.

With Rudy and Naz opting in, the Wolves payroll starting the 2025-26 season would be slightly over $209 million. The current second apron is at $188 million. If the Wolves reduce Rudy’s $46 million down to $30 million and Naz exercises his player option at $15 million, the Wolves payroll would be close to $194 million, which would be around $6 million over the current 2nd apron and probably still over the 2nd apron next summer. Moreover, we’d only have 9 roster players adding up to that number - without NAW or Luka Garza. And of course that assumes Naz opts in at $15 million even though his market value will likely be significantly higher. If Naz doesn’t opt in and we let him walk, our payroll would be around $179 million with 6 roster spots to fill. If we filled all 6 with vet minimum guys, which means letting NAW walk, our payroll would be around $191 million - $3 million over the current 2nd apron threshold.

Bottom line is that we can’t realistically keep both Rudy and KAT beyond next season unless Rudy agrees to an extension at a salary substantially below $30 million (way, way below his $46 million opt in). If he agrees to an annual salary of $20 million, then we could possibly keep NAW and stay below the 2nd apron, but we’d lose Naz. To keep all three bigs and have any chance of squeezing in under the 2nd apron, Rudy would have to accept no more than $15 million per year and Naz would have to accept no more than $25 million annually. But it would still be really hard to get under the 2nd apron after filling the remaining roster slots and we’d still lose NAW.

Again, it’s highly unlikely the Wolves keep both Rudy and KAT after next season. I continue to believe the Wolves will trade KAT next summer mainly because Rudy provides what neither Naz nor Garza provides and because TC continues to express his desire to extend Rudy. However, TC said they wanted to re-sign Kyle Anderson for next season; yet they didn’t and it seems clear they didn’t sign him because he wanted a multi-year deal, which would frustrate the team’s ability to get under the 2nd apron. So as much as TC might sincerely say he wants to extend and keep Rudy, the reality of the second apron will likely prevent it unless Rudy is accommodating to an extent that would be highly unusual. Further, the Wolves front office might be prepared to pivot to a more space-and-pace game for Wolves 2.0 with Ant, Jaden, Dilly, TSJ, Naz and KAT. I also think Rudy might land us a better return because of his expiring contract. So I won’t be surprised if the Wolves keep KAT and move Rudy next summer. I WILL be surprised if the Wolves keep both.
I believe with the new tv deal the cap will go up 10% in 25-26 due to the cap smoothing so the 2nd apron should start at 206.8 in 25-26 and another 10% in 26-27 so that should be 227.48 for the 2nd apron. Either way yeah it's going to be hard to give Naz his full value even with Rudy lowering his salary.
2 things to add.

Garza is on a 2 year deal with a club option in the 2nd year for what like 2.6 million? That's basically a vet min deal. They are only cutting him loose if he sucks.

Lip makes a good point Connelly said they hope this is Gobert's last stop. It's clear though Connelly has limits about what he will pay to keep players like Lip mentioned with Kyle Anderson. I think he said nice things about Taurean Prince too but they decided to allocate those funds differently and that led them to be able to trade for Morris. If Connelly can figure out a way he can downgrade from Gobert's (or Towns) value on the court a bit while saving a bunch money and getting assets like he did by moving Kyle anderson and signing Joe Ingles to the vet min...then sure he might go that route. I do think Connelly is willing to offer something that's far from a total slap in the face to Gobert in an extension. But how much and how long is he willing to go? Idk it's gonna depend on how much Gobert is willing to take. Let's keep in mind for Gobert to opt out he is opting out of 46.5 million. That's a bunch of money. He has to make a good chunk on the years following or what is the point of opting out financially?
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15292
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by Lipoli390 »

Monster wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 10:10 pm
rapsuperstar31 wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 6:09 pm
Lipoli390 wrote: Wed Jul 10, 2024 5:56 pm

I don’t think Hollinger has his math right.

With Rudy and Naz opting in, the Wolves payroll starting the 2025-26 season would be slightly over $209 million. The current second apron is at $188 million. If the Wolves reduce Rudy’s $46 million down to $30 million and Naz exercises his player option at $15 million, the Wolves payroll would be close to $194 million, which would be around $6 million over the current 2nd apron and probably still over the 2nd apron next summer. Moreover, we’d only have 9 roster players adding up to that number - without NAW or Luka Garza. And of course that assumes Naz opts in at $15 million even though his market value will likely be significantly higher. If Naz doesn’t opt in and we let him walk, our payroll would be around $179 million with 6 roster spots to fill. If we filled all 6 with vet minimum guys, which means letting NAW walk, our payroll would be around $191 million - $3 million over the current 2nd apron threshold.

Bottom line is that we can’t realistically keep both Rudy and KAT beyond next season unless Rudy agrees to an extension at a salary substantially below $30 million (way, way below his $46 million opt in). If he agrees to an annual salary of $20 million, then we could possibly keep NAW and stay below the 2nd apron, but we’d lose Naz. To keep all three bigs and have any chance of squeezing in under the 2nd apron, Rudy would have to accept no more than $15 million per year and Naz would have to accept no more than $25 million annually. But it would still be really hard to get under the 2nd apron after filling the remaining roster slots and we’d still lose NAW.

Again, it’s highly unlikely the Wolves keep both Rudy and KAT after next season. I continue to believe the Wolves will trade KAT next summer mainly because Rudy provides what neither Naz nor Garza provides and because TC continues to express his desire to extend Rudy. However, TC said they wanted to re-sign Kyle Anderson for next season; yet they didn’t and it seems clear they didn’t sign him because he wanted a multi-year deal, which would frustrate the team’s ability to get under the 2nd apron. So as much as TC might sincerely say he wants to extend and keep Rudy, the reality of the second apron will likely prevent it unless Rudy is accommodating to an extent that would be highly unusual. Further, the Wolves front office might be prepared to pivot to a more space-and-pace game for Wolves 2.0 with Ant, Jaden, Dilly, TSJ, Naz and KAT. I also think Rudy might land us a better return because of his expiring contract. So I won’t be surprised if the Wolves keep KAT and move Rudy next summer. I WILL be surprised if the Wolves keep both.
I believe with the new tv deal the cap will go up 10% in 25-26 due to the cap smoothing so the 2nd apron should start at 206.8 in 25-26 and another 10% in 26-27 so that should be 227.48 for the 2nd apron. Either way yeah it's going to be hard to give Naz his full value even with Rudy lowering his salary.
2 things to add.

Garza is on a 2 year deal with a club option in the 2nd year for what like 2.6 million? That's basically a vet min deal. They are only cutting him loose if he sucks.

Lip makes a good point Connelly said they hope this is Gobert's last stop. It's clear though Connelly has limits about what he will pay to keep players like Lip mentioned with Kyle Anderson. I think he said nice things about Taurean Prince too but they decided to allocate those funds differently and that led them to be able to trade for Morris. If Connelly can figure out a way he can downgrade from Gobert's (or Towns) value on the court a bit while saving a bunch money and getting assets like he did by moving Kyle anderson and signing Joe Ingles to the vet min...then sure he might go that route. I do think Connelly is willing to offer something that's far from a total slap in the face to Gobert in an extension. But how much and how long is he willing to go? Idk it's gonna depend on how much Gobert is willing to take. Let's keep in mind for Gobert to opt out he is opting out of 46.5 million. That's a bunch of money. He has to make a good chunk on the years following or what is the point of opting out financially?
Great point about keeping in mind what Rudy gives up if he opts out, Monster. Do you know whether we can offer him a five year deal or are we limited to four years?
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 7029
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by 60WinTim »

Jarrett Allen just signed a 3 year extension for $91 mil starting in '26-27. That first year starts at 28 mil. That's encouraging for those of us hoping the Wolves can work out an extension for Rudy. I looked at the numbers again with Rob and Shannon in the mix -- a Rudy opt-out-sign-an-extension that starts at 30 mil next year would probably put the Wolves under the LUXURY tax for '25-26! (that assumes NAZ opts out and is not re-signed, and NAW moves on as well)
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Rudy Gobert Contract

Post by Monster »

60WinTim wrote: Thu Aug 01, 2024 4:24 pm Jarrett Allen just signed a 3 year extension for $91 mil starting in '26-27. That first year starts at 28 mil. That's encouraging for those of us hoping the Wolves can work out an extension for Rudy. I looked at the numbers again with Rob and Shannon in the mix -- a Rudy opt-out-sign-an-extension that starts at 30 mil next year would probably put the Wolves under the LUXURY tax for '25-26! (that assumes NAZ opts out and is not re-signed, and NAW moves on as well)
I was surprised at how that was a max extension for Allen not that I think he deserves more but yeah. I think I would be more encouraged by Brunson taking less in an extension than the numbers for Allen but they both show a path of Gobert taking something moderately palatable (especially considering what he would be opting out of).

I know some people may not want to pay Rudy Gobert 30+ million however again we have to remember he would be opting out of 46 million in 2025-2026 season. Here is an example of what the Wolves could do to keep Gobert around and not lock themselves into a guy that could fall off.

Rudy opts out and the Wolves resign him to a 4 year 135 million deal. 110 or 115 would be guaranteed. So it would start at like 30 million and have raises every year and then that last season he would be guaranteed at least 10 million for the final season and if the Wolves wanted to let him go it would be kinda like those void years NFL teams use to kick the can down the road on salary. There could even be some incentives to raise the guaranteed money. I'm thinking something along the lines of what Al Horford had for a few years when he signed as a FA with Philly. Horford is now onna pretty affordable deal. That theoretical last year govert could get his guaranteed money the Wolves opt out of giving him the full chunk and then resign him maybe even to a multi-year deal.

To me at this point unless Gobert is willing to do something really financially reasonable it seems more likely that he and the Wolves would go at least into the season and see how everything goes before deciding they want to lock Gobert in for likely an additional 2 years. There is risk in resigning Gobert as he ages (you can say that for a number of players) and Gobert if he waits could risk losing out on getting paid after his final year of his contract. Finch is locked in but Connelly is only signed as the PBO for one more season. What if he left and someone else came in? Ownership isn't settled either. Some of these things could be settled before the deadline for being able to do an extension in season passes. It wouldn't be the worst if they do it next off-season. They may have a better idea of what they will he doing with guys like Naz and NAW.
Post Reply