I'm not Kekgeek's grades OKC @ Wolves

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10263
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: I'm not Kekgeek's grades OKC @ Wolves

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

Coolbreeze44 wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:22 am Give it up for TC - The man knows how to draft. Three hits in Dilly, TSJ, and Clark. Clark at #53 by the way.
To be fair... the expectations for the #8 pick the team traded for are high.

So he'll have to improve a lot to meet them.
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: I'm not Kekgeek's grades OKC @ Wolves

Post by Duke13 »

Lipoli390 wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:03 pm
Q-is-here wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 10:06 pm Naz - A+ (Kek told me to tell all of you that he thinks Naz deserves the supermax)
Jaden - A-
Ant - B
NAW - B+
Shannon - A-
Clark - B
Dillingham - A
Garza - A
I missed the game tonight. I’ll definitely have to watch the recording.

The box score seems to align well with your grades except for Clark. His stats don’t seem on par with a B but maybe he was great defensively, which is often hard to discern from box score stats.

Here are my box score grades:

Naz - A+ (I said long ago that he’s going to command $30M per year in the FA market. We’ll….)
Jaden - A (I took your minus away. Loved his stat line and how he came back strong tonight).
Ant - B (I’m bumping him up to a B+ in spite of his poor shooting. He did other stuff.
NAW - B+
Shannon - A- (This is the guy I’m most excited about on the roster. We win last night if he’s in the past 5 minutes)
Clark - B (Looking forward to your explanation for such a high grade with such poor stats)
Dillingham - A (Looks like he listened to Finch who told him to be more of a PG and less of a scorer. And zero turnovers!)
Garza - A (Nice to see him come back with a more typical Luke performance. Some people were writing him off too soon based on a couple bad games with limited minutes)

It looks like Ant had another bad night shooting but he did what you said he should have done last night - (1) he attacked the basket and got to the line 11 times, (2) he crashed the boards with 8 rebounds, (3) he facilitated for his teammates with 7 assists, and (4) he played aggressive defense with 3 steals. It was also great to see him have only 2 turnovers.
Save everyone the time and refrain from giving “box score” grades in the future. Thank you.
User avatar
Q-is-here
Posts: 7468
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:00 am

Re: I'm not Kekgeek's grades OKC @ Wolves

Post by Q-is-here »

Duke13 wrote: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:39 am
Lipoli390 wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:03 pm
Q-is-here wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 10:06 pm Naz - A+ (Kek told me to tell all of you that he thinks Naz deserves the supermax)
Jaden - A-
Ant - B
NAW - B+
Shannon - A-
Clark - B
Dillingham - A
Garza - A
I missed the game tonight. I’ll definitely have to watch the recording.

The box score seems to align well with your grades except for Clark. His stats don’t seem on par with a B but maybe he was great defensively, which is often hard to discern from box score stats.

Here are my box score grades:

Naz - A+ (I said long ago that he’s going to command $30M per year in the FA market. We’ll….)
Jaden - A (I took your minus away. Loved his stat line and how he came back strong tonight).
Ant - B (I’m bumping him up to a B+ in spite of his poor shooting. He did other stuff.
NAW - B+
Shannon - A- (This is the guy I’m most excited about on the roster. We win last night if he’s in the past 5 minutes)
Clark - B (Looking forward to your explanation for such a high grade with such poor stats)
Dillingham - A (Looks like he listened to Finch who told him to be more of a PG and less of a scorer. And zero turnovers!)
Garza - A (Nice to see him come back with a more typical Luke performance. Some people were writing him off too soon based on a couple bad games with limited minutes)

It looks like Ant had another bad night shooting but he did what you said he should have done last night - (1) he attacked the basket and got to the line 11 times, (2) he crashed the boards with 8 rebounds, (3) he facilitated for his teammates with 7 assists, and (4) he played aggressive defense with 3 steals. It was also great to see him have only 2 turnovers.
Save everyone the time and refrain from giving “box score” grades in the future. Thank you.
I for one don't mind Lip's commentary, so speak for yourself.

It's too bad the only time you ever come on this site (and its prior iterations) is to shit on someone. I mean seriously, it's been what...months or years since you have chimed in here and this is what you take the time to write? At least Lip contributes and adds value. It appears you're just the same ass you've always been.
User avatar
Leado01
Posts: 1419
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: I'm not Kekgeek's grades OKC @ Wolves

Post by Leado01 »

I'm not worried about Shannon hitting 3's...his form isn't great but Shannon will shoot above league average if he works mostly from the corner...he's got enough history shooting 3's at a high percentage to keep defenses honest
1965-2025
"He Meant Well"
User avatar
Jester1534
Posts: 3759
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: I'm not Kekgeek's grades OKC @ Wolves

Post by Jester1534 »

Lipoli390 wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 11:03 pm
Q-is-here wrote: Thu Feb 13, 2025 10:06 pm Naz - A+ (Kek told me to tell all of you that he thinks Naz deserves the supermax)
Jaden - A-
Ant - B
NAW - B+
Shannon - A-
Clark - B
Dillingham - A
Garza - A
I missed the game tonight. I’ll definitely have to watch the recording.

The box score seems to align well with your grades except for Clark. His stats don’t seem on par with a B but maybe he was great defensively, which is often hard to discern from box score stats.

Here are my box score grades:

Naz - A+ (I said long ago that he’s going to command $30M per year in the FA market. We’ll….)
Jaden - A (I took your minus away. Loved his stat line and how he came back strong tonight).
Ant - B (I’m bumping him up to a B+ in spite of his poor shooting. He did other stuff.
NAW - B+
Shannon - A- (This is the guy I’m most excited about on the roster. We win last night if he’s in the past 5 minutes)
Clark - B (Looking forward to your explanation for such a high grade with such poor stats)
Dillingham - A (Looks like he listened to Finch who told him to be more of a PG and less of a scorer. And zero turnovers!)
Garza - A (Nice to see him come back with a more typical Luke performance. Some people were writing him off too soon based on a couple bad games with limited minutes)

It looks like Ant had another bad night shooting but he did what you said he should have done last night - (1) he attacked the basket and got to the line 11 times, (2) he crashed the boards with 8 rebounds, (3) he facilitated for his teammates with 7 assists, and (4) he played aggressive defense with 3 steals. It was also great to see him have only 2 turnovers.

SGA 1-7 against clark and he block his best move the forearm spin-away fade away in the paint once.

Him and shannon should do nothing but work on corner threes this offseason and there gonna make a-lot of money in this league
Post Reply