You're right that Ant isn't going to get traded, no disagreement there.Q-is-here wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 1:54 pm,Coolbreeze44 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 1:18 pmIt's not just the Ant takes you reference. We could talk about my takes on DLO, McDaniels, Clark, Towns, Butler, Mobley, Beverly, Brewer, Crawford, Culver, Dunn, Flynn, Hudson - I mean how many do you want me to name?Q-is-here wrote: ↑Thu Mar 20, 2025 12:51 pm
What was controversial and far-fetched was your take that his off court behavior sexually equates to low IQ on the court, when there is ample evidence of past sports legends (and world class performers from other professions including your own admission on Elon Musk) that the two things are mutually exclusive. I don't recall anyone actually retorting that Ant's on court IQ was awesome and couldn't use improvement.
The other thing you declared was that he can't be the best player on a title team. That's hardly a bold statement when most NBA players never win titles to begin with. It's a league that has largely been dominated by dynasties over the years and there are plenty of great players that didn't/haven't won a title. Heck, the greatest player in a generation, Nikola Jokic, has only won one title. And the reality is he's the best we've got for right now and no matter what you think, the front office isn't trading him anytime soon.
I never said the front office was going to trade Ant, just that it SHOULD be on the table. We could have Luka right now but smart guys like you and your paradigms won't allow for such thinking. And for the record, my take on Ant has less to do about his off court activities and more to do with his overall lack of intelligence and self awareness. I don't know exactly what it is, but he's missing something that the true greats possess.
Well, Luka hasn't won a title yet either! Remember how he was relentlessly targeted last year by Boston in the Finals? He's a flawed player as well.
It's hard to detach your takes on Ant's on court decisions without your referencing his off court exploits since you made it very clear how you thought the two were linked.
And my paradigms aren't as fixed as you may think. There are all sorts of things that I might think make sense hypothetically but I don't think are realistic. One of them is trading Ant. I'll be proven wrong if he suddenly gets moved in the next year or two, but I doubt that's going to happen.
And finally, for all the patting yourself on the back you like to do, you get some things really wrong too just like the rest of us.
And yes, I'm wrong about a lot of things, no question about it. But I AM willing to stick my neck out and make declarations long before they become fashionable. All I'm asking is that people keep an open mind to these things and not immediately resort to flaming and telling me how ridiculous I am. I'm responding to you because you have challenged me on this here today. I don't necessarily include you in the group I'm talking about.