The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
BeenLurkin
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 4:25 pm

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by BeenLurkin »

Keegan is shorter than Jaden and averaged 1 more rebound per game. And a point less. But yeah we should give up all our youth and glue guys.
AussieWolf3
Posts: 1619
Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 5:11 pm

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by AussieWolf3 »

BeenLurkin wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 7:18 pm Keegan is shorter than Jaden and averaged 1 more rebound per game. And a point less. But yeah we should give up all our youth and glue guys.
He barely played this year for a garbage Kings team, he's also 225 pounds

Wanna guess who's birthday is whose here?

July 30th 2000
Aug 19th 2000
Nov 16th 2000
BeenLurkin
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 4:25 pm

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by BeenLurkin »

Jaden’s is 9/29/2000
BeenLurkin
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 4:25 pm

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by BeenLurkin »

And Jaden was listed at 200lbs as a freshman at Washington….so we can all stop listing heights and weights because they a lie. It’s all money and negotiation tactics.
AussieWolf3
Posts: 1619
Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 5:11 pm

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by AussieWolf3 »

BeenLurkin wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:17 pm Jaden’s is 9/29/2000
Jaden's age wasn't a factor in the equation
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24938
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by Monster »

BeenLurkin wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:22 pm And Jaden was listed at 200lbs as a freshman at Washington….so we can all stop listing heights and weights because they a lie. It’s all money and negotiation tactics.
FWIW a couple years ago the NBA said you had to put down the actual weight and height for players. Idk if they have stuck with that but since then it has seemed a little more accurate than it did for the like 30 years before that.
AussieWolf3
Posts: 1619
Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 5:11 pm

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by AussieWolf3 »

BeenLurkin wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:22 pm And Jaden was listed at 200lbs as a freshman at Washington….so we can all stop listing heights and weights because they a lie. It’s all money and negotiation tactics.
Lol well that's certainly true, but you brought it up first.

I like what Keegan would give this team because, one he's still young, two he would give the starting 5 a little more bulk, three he can guard the perimeter, and four him and Jaden would basically be interchangeable which I like a lot

Fwiw I'm not really that keen to trade for a PF and I think the matter has pretty much become a meme, but there are risk if they go into the season without an established PF
Last edited by AussieWolf3 on Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24938
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by Monster »

AussieWolf3 wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 7:13 pm He's expensive, but that likely deprecates his value which may allow him to be gettable: Keegan Murray.

It would be a coup to trade green, DDV and Shannon for him. The risk is the long contract and maybe he doesn't get back on track. He'd make the roster very very good, one of the best in the league, but also pretty inflexible--- even more so than it is now.
I think that's a lot to give up for someone making more money than PJ Washington and idk if he is actually any better. I'm willing to listen though. Lets say it was even just for Donte and Green like you said you said that would make the roster building pretty tricky.
BeenLurkin
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 4:25 pm

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by BeenLurkin »

AussieWolf3 wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:25 pm
BeenLurkin wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:22 pm And Jaden was listed at 200lbs as a freshman at Washington….so we can all stop listing heights and weights because they a lie. It’s all money and negotiation tactics.
Lol well that's certainly true, but you brought it up first.

I like what Keegan would give this team because, one he's still young, two he would give the starting 5 a little more bulk, three he can guard the perimeter, and four him and Jaden would basically be interchangeable which I like a lot

Fwiw I'm not really that keen to trade for a PF and I think the matter has pretty much become a meme, but there are risk if they go into the season without an established PF
I would rather have Jaden play PF which he is big enough to do and keep TJ and DDV.
AussieWolf3
Posts: 1619
Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 5:11 pm

Re: The list of forwards that can be had for Green/DDV

Post by AussieWolf3 »

BeenLurkin wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:29 pm
AussieWolf3 wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:25 pm
BeenLurkin wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 8:22 pm And Jaden was listed at 200lbs as a freshman at Washington….so we can all stop listing heights and weights because they a lie. It’s all money and negotiation tactics.
Lol well that's certainly true, but you brought it up first.

I like what Keegan would give this team because, one he's still young, two he would give the starting 5 a little more bulk, three he can guard the perimeter, and four him and Jaden would basically be interchangeable which I like a lot

Fwiw I'm not really that keen to trade for a PF and I think the matter has pretty much become a meme, but there are risk if they go into the season without an established PF
I would rather have Jaden play PF which he is big enough to do and keep TJ and DDV.
I think that's underrating Murrary, but I legit don't have any problem with that. I am worried TJ shits the bed again nor isn't really a forward. If DDV is really apart of the future vision for the team than I'm with that too. I just like what Murray gives the team, it's less projection based.

That said the FO needs to make some projection based decisions
Post Reply