TheSP wrote:I was sure this thread was going to be about the Olsen twins.
Let's be realistic, SP...who in their right mind is going to select Mary Kate?
TheSP wrote:I was sure this thread was going to be about the Olsen twins.
longstrangetrip wrote:TheSP wrote:I was sure this thread was going to be about the Olsen twins.
Let's be realistic, SP...who in their right mind is going to select Mary Kate?
Carlos Danger wrote:Camden wrote:Someone care to enlighten me on what established All-Star is available AND young enough to make it worthwhile?
I meant it as open. Obviously nobody knows who will or won't be available. I think it's safe to assume their very top tier guys like LeBron and Anthony Davis would not be and that's what I meant by "not LeBron great". But maybe Demarcus Cousins type good.
longstrangetrip wrote:Carlos Danger wrote:Camden wrote:Someone care to enlighten me on what established All-Star is available AND young enough to make it worthwhile?
I meant it as open. Obviously nobody knows who will or won't be available. I think it's safe to assume their very top tier guys like LeBron and Anthony Davis would not be and that's what I meant by "not LeBron great". But maybe Demarcus Cousins type good.
I don't want to be a thread-killer, but I don't think anyone would say Davis is "LeBron great". He's a top 3 player, but he can't be in the same conversation with James. LBJ was included by most of us on their 10 greatest list, and AD was on none of them. Unless you change the wording in the poll, either Davis is in...or someone has to make a case for him being in James' class.
Now, I want to hear those who selected option 1 defend choosing the first pick over Anthony Davis.
khans2k5 wrote:Anybody think the Thunder would trade Durant for #1? Would you do #1 and Lavine for Durant? Just curious.
longstrangetrip wrote:Carlos Danger wrote:Camden wrote:Someone care to enlighten me on what established All-Star is available AND young enough to make it worthwhile?
I meant it as open. Obviously nobody knows who will or won't be available. I think it's safe to assume their very top tier guys like LeBron and Anthony Davis would not be and that's what I meant by "not LeBron great". But maybe Demarcus Cousins type good.
I don't want to be a thread-killer, but I don't think anyone would say Davis is "LeBron great". He's a top 3 player, but he can't be in the same conversation with James. LBJ was included by most of us on their 10 greatest list, and AD was on none of them. Unless you change the wording in the poll, either Davis is in...or someone has to make a case for him being in James' class.
Now, I want to hear those who selected option 1 defend choosing the first pick over Anthony Davis.
longstrangetrip wrote:Carlos Danger wrote:Camden wrote:Someone care to enlighten me on what established All-Star is available AND young enough to make it worthwhile?
I meant it as open. Obviously nobody knows who will or won't be available. I think it's safe to assume their very top tier guys like LeBron and Anthony Davis would not be and that's what I meant by "not LeBron great". But maybe Demarcus Cousins type good.
I don't want to be a thread-killer, but I don't think anyone would say Davis is "LeBron great". He's a top 3 player, but he can't be in the same conversation with James. LBJ was included by most of us on their 10 greatest list, and AD was on none of them. Unless you change the wording in the poll, either Davis is in...or someone has to make a case for him being in James' class.
Now, I want to hear those who selected option 1 defend choosing the first pick over Anthony Davis.
khans2k5 wrote:Anybody think the Thunder would trade Durant for #1? Would you do #1 and Lavine for Durant? Just curious.