Q12543 wrote:Very good point Hockey. If anything, fans overvalue the impact of rookies and 2nd year players. Even Wiggins had a miserable start, going 20+ games before hitting his stride. And even now, he still has a "meh" performance on a regular basis. LaVine, Bennett, and Payne have all been more bad than good. Dieng and Shabazz have made strides offensively, but both are very poor defenders.
The fact of the matter is that other than post game 25 Wiggins, our vets have been saddled with a bunch of players who simply aren't good.....yet. Hopefully they will improve and get better, but that's no guarantee either, as we have seen countless of young players cycle through this franchise over the years that end up never improving.
We have to keep this in mind with our lottery pick this year. That player probably won't be making a big impact for us until year 2 or 3, and will perhaps be more of a liability on the court in Year 1.
Sorta related, no NBA team with its best player shooting less than 38% has been good in about 60 years. Rubio is still a more effective player on the court than Wiggins. I think we all realize that should change once Wiggins develops a bit more.
Until then, however, the Wolves will remain a bad team. Whether they ever become "good" depends on the development of Wiggins specifically... and a few auxiliary players. And, the luck of the ping pong balls.