Camden wrote:mrhockey89 wrote:Camden wrote:TRKO wrote:Camden0916 wrote:khans2k5 wrote:Camden0916 wrote:Other than Winslow being black and left-handed, the Harden comparison makes zero sense. Some tried to do that with Muhammad too.
That's just ignorant. He goes to the bucket relentlessly and draws contact quite often. There is a comparison beyond being black and left handed.
It's nothing against Winslow, but Harden is a poor comparison for him. Believe what you want to.
PS: Harden, Duncan, Wade, etc. These comparisons get made every year. Pump the brakes. Most of the time the play styles are different, and that's the case with Winslow.
That's all well and good, but you used some very lofty comparisons with Towns.
I compared him to LaMarcus Aldridge with better defense? Towns is in a completely different tier than Winslow.
PS: Harden's my MVP this year so maybe I'm taking his value for more than what you guys are. Winslow's not a "carry your team" guy. He's a really nice second fiddle that could help you win your ring, though.
I've got Harden as my MVP choice right now. Harden was a nice "2nd fiddle" when he was coming out too. In fact, he was 3rd fiddle with the Thunder, and ultimately the Thunder picked Durant, Westbrook, AND Ibaka over him. Harden was a "nice" player with the Thunder, but he broke out when he had the opportunity to take over a team of his own (in addition to his improvement all around).
Harden was no second fiddle at Arizona State. That is for damn sure.
And the Thunder did pick Ibaka over Harden for monetary reasons, and guess how that looks for them now? Real stupid. Not sure why this was a point of yours, though. We're talking college basketball and you jumped to the NBA.
Winslow's more Shawn Marion to me than he is James Harden, and I don't even like that comparison.
Harden also didn't have the preseason slated #1 overall pick and many others to share with, nor did he make the NCAA Finals, and he didn't come out as a freshman either.
I completely disagree that the Thunder picked Ibaka over Harden for financial reasons. This was a big debate at the time as to which they should keep, because it was "one or the other" and not both simply because they couldn't go deep into the luxury by keeping both like a team like the Lakers/Nets could/would. If the Thunder thought Harden would become as good as he has, they would have kept him, plain and simple. With the Thunder, he represented a stellar 6th man who was also a great closer. But he was a guy that needed the ball, and they already had 2 other scorers, while Ibaka was able to protect their rim and be their defensive stopper.
The reason I brought this up is because you're talking about Harden right now as if he was anything close to what he is when he was coming out of college. Tyreke Evans won ROY, Blake Griffin was supposed to be the class of the draft, Rubio was supposed to be the guy who could change everything with his crazy passing and court vision, Thabeet was ultra skinny but had a ton of height/length and was a shot blocking dynamo at UConn. Harden was supposed to be the old school guard who was going to bring his lunch pail and be a good player, but was never supposed to be a MVP candidate.
So...what I'm suggesting is that I see a ton of similarities in their size and their styles of play. You're trying to compare a freshman college Justise Winslow to a NBA League MVP candidate playing his best season as a pro. To me that's like someone saying Wiggins looks like he could be a young Paul George only to have someone else shoot that down saying that Paul George is an established All-Star who has taken his team deep into the NBA playoffs and therefore it's a terrible comparison.