Re: Around the NBA:2025-6
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2025 7:29 pm
Celtics win @ Cleveland on their 2nd night of a back to back. We beat a good team last night!
Wolves fan commiserate here!
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=32022
I would attached a few 2nds to Mike and sent him to Brooklyn to re-sign NAW at the time, and still feel like that is what we should have done. If Brooklyn would have bought him out in the summer, I believe we could have brought him back on a min.AbeVigodaLive wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:18 am Yeah.
NAW is doing better than I thought he could as more of a main guy. He leads the Hawks in three-point attempts and is over 20 ppg on decent efficiency.
It's all hindsight (I think I'd have kept Reid over NAW, too), but did Reid's local popularity play into that decision at all?
I haven't watched him much, but the stats suggest his defense has suffered a bit, which is to be expected given the usage and minutes he's carrying. His D-rating while on the court is higher than it ever was with the Wolves and his Defensive Estimated Plus Minus is in the 39th percentile, meaning just below average.AbeVigodaLive wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:18 am Yeah.
NAW is doing better than I thought he could as more of a main guy. He leads the Hawks in three-point attempts and is over 20 ppg on decent efficiency.
It's all hindsight (I think I'd have kept Reid over NAW, too), but did Reid's local popularity play into that decision at all?
I think Mike Conley was put on an unofficial "no trade" list the moment he re-signed here. And then Finch laminated it and put that list behind glass just in case.rapsuperstar31 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:35 amI would attached a few 2nds to Mike and sent him to Brooklyn to re-sign NAW at the time, and still feel like that is what we should have done. If Brooklyn would have bought him out in the summer, I believe we could have brought him back on a min.AbeVigodaLive wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:18 am Yeah.
NAW is doing better than I thought he could as more of a main guy. He leads the Hawks in three-point attempts and is over 20 ppg on decent efficiency.
It's all hindsight (I think I'd have kept Reid over NAW, too), but did Reid's local popularity play into that decision at all?
I do believe Mike is probably going to have a lot of front office/coaching potential. But between him and Ingles it feels like we are going out of our way to ensure mentoring on the roster. Besides if Conley does become a coach or exec he will move to the best opportunity anyway.AbeVigodaLive wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 11:31 amI think Mike Conley was put on an unofficial "no trade" list the moment he re-signed here. And then Finch laminated it and put that list behind glass just in case.rapsuperstar31 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:35 amI would attached a few 2nds to Mike and sent him to Brooklyn to re-sign NAW at the time, and still feel like that is what we should have done. If Brooklyn would have bought him out in the summer, I believe we could have brought him back on a min.AbeVigodaLive wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:18 am Yeah.
NAW is doing better than I thought he could as more of a main guy. He leads the Hawks in three-point attempts and is over 20 ppg on decent efficiency.
It's all hindsight (I think I'd have kept Reid over NAW, too), but did Reid's local popularity play into that decision at all?
I think his folk hero status had a lot to do with deciding to keep him instead of NAW...it's ultimately a business, and Naz puts more casual fans in the seats.AbeVigodaLive wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:18 am Yeah.
NAW is doing better than I thought he could as more of a main guy. He leads the Hawks in three-point attempts and is over 20 ppg on decent efficiency.
It's all hindsight (I think I'd have kept Reid over NAW, too), but did Reid's local popularity play into that decision at all?
But if you kept NAW, how are you fitting him into the rotation? Banning Mike to the bench? Sending Dilly, Clark and Shannon back down to the Iowa? There just wasn't room for NAW in the rotation assuming one or more of the young guys were ready for minutes.FNG wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 1:13 pmI think his folk hero status had a lot to do with deciding to keep him instead of NAW...it's ultimately a business, and Naz puts more casual fans in the seats.AbeVigodaLive wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:18 am Yeah.
NAW is doing better than I thought he could as more of a main guy. He leads the Hawks in three-point attempts and is over 20 ppg on decent efficiency.
It's all hindsight (I think I'd have kept Reid over NAW, too), but did Reid's local popularity play into that decision at all?
Let's remember that Naz is making $10 million more than NAW, so the choice was between Naz and NAW plus $10 million to spend on a backup center. Naz is starting to play better at both ends, but I still think I would take NAW and Luke Kornet over him.
NAW would have had more value in trade talks. In a bigger trade Mike is salary filler, where NAW might be an enticing piece to a team wanting defense.60WinTim wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 1:50 pmBut if you kept NAW, how are you fitting him into the rotation? Banning Mike to the bench? Sending Dilly, Clark and Shannon back down to the Iowa? There just wasn't room for NAW in the rotation assuming one or more of the young guys were ready for minutes.FNG wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 1:13 pmI think his folk hero status had a lot to do with deciding to keep him instead of NAW...it's ultimately a business, and Naz puts more casual fans in the seats.AbeVigodaLive wrote: ↑Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:18 am Yeah.
NAW is doing better than I thought he could as more of a main guy. He leads the Hawks in three-point attempts and is over 20 ppg on decent efficiency.
It's all hindsight (I think I'd have kept Reid over NAW, too), but did Reid's local popularity play into that decision at all?
Let's remember that Naz is making $10 million more than NAW, so the choice was between Naz and NAW plus $10 million to spend on a backup center. Naz is starting to play better at both ends, but I still think I would take NAW and Luke Kornet over him.