TRKO wrote:longstrangetrip wrote:Grant does appear to be a terrific shooter, but I still subscribe to Q's theory that we need a distributor/defender to back up Rubio, and Grant is not a good defender. I'm not inclined to use assets to move up to pick a PG who is so skinny (6-5, 198) and unathletic, and has little upside as a 22 year old senior. I'm not keen on pairing a poor defender with Shabazz and Martin. I would prefer to hope that Deion Wright falls to us at 31. Sure, he's also skinny and a senior, but he is an excellent passer and defender and might not cost us anything to move up.
I'm not a pro scout, but I don't see Grant as unathletic. He shoots well, he distributes well, he has the bloodlines, he can play both guard spots. I think he would be projected higher if not for him being older. I like him better than Jones. With his size and length I think he can develop into a good defender too.
I think that's a fair assessment, TRKO. He's described as not a very good jumper and weak with his slight frame, but he's also described as having good lateral quickness. So even though he was not considered a good defender during his 4 years at Notre Dame, some agree with your assessment that he can develop into a good defender.
My position remains the same though. He's a 4-year guy who shot less than 31% on threes his senior year, and yet he's going to go somewhere in the teens...thus, it would cost us assets to get him. One might argue that even though he's not a long-range shooter, he's excellent mid-range, and that's what Flip's offense is all about. But I don't want to build our roster around Flip...I know that we are going to have a more modern coach, maybe as early as 2016-7, and mid-range shots will no longer be the focus. I'm not as high on Bjelica as others, so if some team would trade us a pick in the teens for him, I would be interested in Grant. But I wouldn't give up our seconds for him...there are guys projected to go in the 30s that I think have more upside than Grant.