Page 178 of 180

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:04 pm
by thedoper
Its a full on troll battle. Ding ding. I was very skeptical of Towns, and was totally wrong and glad I was. Go Wolves.

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:10 pm
by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Camden0916 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:And I've moved on from my Towns comments as well, but here you are again tooting you own horn and bringing it back up again. I've done nothing but praise Towns for his play since the draft.


All I did was bring the thread up. Initially, I didn't name you for anything you had said. I didn't name bleed for wanting Russell. I didn't name anybody. I said it was an entertaining read and left it at that.

And then you got all defensive for no reason and threw out the Parker/Wiggins positions we had. So, at that point, I figured it was game on. It also just felt right to throw those Towns comments at you. You gave me a lot of shit pre-draft, and a lot of it was way off. I'm not allowed to pump up my chest about it? No fun.


I'm not being defensive about this at all. All I did was call you out for tooting your own horn and provide 2 examples when you were wrong and you still don't even admit defeat on Jabari even though every GM in the league would take Wiggins over him. If you want to toot go ahead.

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:34 pm
by bleedspeed
I thought Crystal Pepsi would be a hit.

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:35 pm
by thedoper
bleedspeed177 wrote:I thought Crystal Pepsi would be a hit.


And Zima. Nice.

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:16 pm
by worldK
Anybody care to share some thoughts on malik beasley? Maybe cam who is form florida knows him better. I find him intriguing although he is a outside the lottery 1st round pick. Maybe if we add another non lotto pick or a trade is made where we end up with one, then he might be worth looking at.

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:14 pm
by Monster
bleedspeed177 wrote:I thought Crystal Pepsi would be a hit.


I remember loving that stuff. I heard a few months ago they were going to bring it back. Not sure if it ever happened.

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:21 pm
by Coolbreeze44
I'm trying not to get involved in these types of arguments anymore, but I feel compelled to add one thing here. Anybody who can take the time to dig up an old 178 page thread and read it from cover to cover, simply doesn't have enough to do.

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 11:55 am
by thedoper
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I'm trying not to get involved in these types of arguments anymore, but I feel compelled to add one thing here. Anybody who can take the time to dig up an old 178 page thread and read it from cover to cover, simply doesn't have enough to do.


To be fair some of us probably forgot how pro Towns Cam was right from the beginning. It was nice to have a reminder after all this time.

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:12 pm
by Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I'm trying not to get involved in these types of arguments anymore, but I feel compelled to add one thing here. Anybody who can take the time to dig up an old 178 page thread and read it from cover to cover, simply doesn't have enough to do.



Mmmm, this is coming from someone that once took the time to dig up an old thread and find a quote I made to throw it back in my face (something about Budinger and Wiggins, I can't remember exactly) in the name of "accountability".

Frankly, any outsider that came here and discovered a bunch of people chatting about one of the worst franchises in professional sports history would probably suggest that none of us have enough to do.....

Re: Draft prospects - Who do we want?

Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:39 pm
by Monster
Q12543 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I'm trying not to get involved in these types of arguments anymore, but I feel compelled to add one thing here. Anybody who can take the time to dig up an old 178 page thread and read it from cover to cover, simply doesn't have enough to do.



Mmmm, this is coming from someone that once took the time to dig up an old thread and find a quote I made to throw it back in my face (something about Budinger and Wiggins, I can't remember exactly) in the name of "accountability".

Frankly, any outsider that came here and discovered a bunch of people chatting about one of the worst franchises in professional sports history would probably suggest that none of us have enough to do.....


Yeah...one of my best friends is a popular culture and fandom scholar. Its interesting to hear what people are really interested in and what comes of it. A lot of people spend time on some things that others would find moderately interesting at best.

This is a pretty good community here and sometimes we get off on our tangents and I think a lot of us like to be right about something and don't like to be wrong. :)