Trade Target Performance Tracker

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
Duke13 wrote:This is funny, Playoff teams want one of reserves who doesn't play!! Another example of an underutilized players by Tibs. Tolliver should be seeing the court.



Fair enough. So who doesn't play?


I think Duke is suggesting that Dieng and Tyus would be out of the rotation; Okogie and Tolliver in.
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by Duke13 »

I think you go with a 10 man rotation and take Gorgui out of the rotation and insert Tolliver and Okogie.

I'd start start Saric and have either Saric and or Tolliver on the floor with Kat, obviously much more Saric. Tolliver should be getting 15 minutes I think. But that's under the premise he has the green light to shoot 3's and that takes a system of ball movement which we don't have or do. Tolliver has his weaknesses so if you aren't going to play to his strengths he's a negative player. So while I think he should be playing I think it's futile for the most part because he won't be utilized properly. It's a bigger problem. We aren't coached to play that way. I mean Tibs is yelling a play out every time down the floor. And it usually result in a pass and that guy going 1:1. It take a system to get up 35 3's a game. We don't have it.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

Duke13 wrote:I think you go with a 10 man rotation and take Gorgui out of the rotation and insert Tolliver and Okogie.

I'd start start Saric and have either Saric and or Tolliver on the floor with Kat, obviously much more Saric. Tolliver should be getting 15 minutes I think. But that's under the premise he has the green light to shoot 3's and that takes a system of ball movement which we don't have or do. Tolliver has his weaknesses so if you aren't going to play to his strengths he's a negative player. So while I think he should be playing I think it's futile for the most part because he won't be utilized properly. It's a bigger problem. We aren't coached to play that way. I mean Tibs is yelling a play out every time down the floor. And it usually result in a pass and that guy going 1:1. It take a system to get up 35 3's a game. We don't have it.



So... Gibson becomes the backup big?
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by Duke13 »

I'd think that's a very reasonable option as we acquired a younger, better player at considerable asset cost, so yes I'd move Gibson to the bench playing 18-20 minutes a game.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

Boy, the Josh Richardson crowd must hate this last stretch of games from him.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

Camden wrote:Boy, the Josh Richardson crowd must hate this last stretch of games from him.


Well, I'm not THAT emotionally attached to the guy, geez Cam....

Career highs in points, rebounds, and assists. Shooting 39% from 3. Has a positive net rating on a losing team. 7th amongst shooting guards in RPM. He is being stretched into a much higher usage role than he was previously accustomed to and not exactly surrounded by a ton of talent.

I have no idea if he'll be an all-star caliber player some day, but based on the deals that were rumored at the time, he seemed to be the best option out there knowing we weren't going to get equal value for Butler.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24078
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by Monster »

Q12543 wrote:
Camden wrote:Boy, the Josh Richardson crowd must hate this last stretch of games from him.


Well, I'm not THAT emotionally attached to the guy, geez Cam....

Career highs in points, rebounds, and assists. Shooting 39% from 3. Has a positive net rating on a losing team. 7th amongst shooting guards in RPM. He is being stretched into a much higher usage role than he was previously accustomed to and not exactly surrounded by a ton of talent.

I have no idea if he'll be an all-star caliber player some day, but based on the deals that were rumored at the time, he seemed to be the best option out there knowing we weren't going to get equal value for Butler.


Just for fun...

https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=Josh+Richardson&player_id1_select=Josh+Richardson&y1=2019&player_id1=richajo01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id2_select=Andrew+Wiggins&y2=2019&player_id2=wiggian01&idx=players
User avatar
crazy-canuck [enjin:18955461]
Posts: 3078
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by crazy-canuck [enjin:18955461] »

monsterpile wrote:
Q12543 wrote:
Camden wrote:Boy, the Josh Richardson crowd must hate this last stretch of games from him.


Well, I'm not THAT emotionally attached to the guy, geez Cam....

Career highs in points, rebounds, and assists. Shooting 39% from 3. Has a positive net rating on a losing team. 7th amongst shooting guards in RPM. He is being stretched into a much higher usage role than he was previously accustomed to and not exactly surrounded by a ton of talent.

I have no idea if he'll be an all-star caliber player some day, but based on the deals that were rumored at the time, he seemed to be the best option out there knowing we weren't going to get equal value for Butler.


Just for fun...

https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=Josh+Richardson&player_id1_select=Josh+Richardson&y1=2019&player_id1=richajo01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id2_select=Andrew+Wiggins&y2=2019&player_id2=wiggian01&idx=players


I guess that means wiggs has some competition for worst player in the league :)
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16263
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by Lipoli390 »

monsterpile wrote:
Q12543 wrote:
Camden wrote:Boy, the Josh Richardson crowd must hate this last stretch of games from him.


Well, I'm not THAT emotionally attached to the guy, geez Cam....

Career highs in points, rebounds, and assists. Shooting 39% from 3. Has a positive net rating on a losing team. 7th amongst shooting guards in RPM. He is being stretched into a much higher usage role than he was previously accustomed to and not exactly surrounded by a ton of talent.

I have no idea if he'll be an all-star caliber player some day, but based on the deals that were rumored at the time, he seemed to be the best option out there knowing we weren't going to get equal value for Butler.


Just for fun...

https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=Josh+Richardson&player_id1_select=Josh+Richardson&y1=2019&player_id1=richajo01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id2_select=Andrew+Wiggins&y2=2019&player_id2=wiggian01&idx=players


So Josh has slightly better offensive stats overall than Andrew so far this season. Tells me we should have offered Andrew for Josh. Oh, wait - I don't think the salaries would match. Never mind. :)
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24078
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Trade Target Performance Tracker

Post by Monster »

lipoli390 wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
Q12543 wrote:
Camden wrote:Boy, the Josh Richardson crowd must hate this last stretch of games from him.


Well, I'm not THAT emotionally attached to the guy, geez Cam....

Career highs in points, rebounds, and assists. Shooting 39% from 3. Has a positive net rating on a losing team. 7th amongst shooting guards in RPM. He is being stretched into a much higher usage role than he was previously accustomed to and not exactly surrounded by a ton of talent.

I have no idea if he'll be an all-star caliber player some day, but based on the deals that were rumored at the time, he seemed to be the best option out there knowing we weren't going to get equal value for Butler.


Just for fun...

https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=0&player_id1_hint=Josh+Richardson&player_id1_select=Josh+Richardson&y1=2019&player_id1=richajo01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id2_select=Andrew+Wiggins&y2=2019&player_id2=wiggian01&idx=players


So Josh has slightly better offensive stats overall than Andrew so far this season. Tells me we should have offered Andrew for Josh. Oh, wait - I don't think the salaries would match. Never mind. :)


Well...the salaries between these guys aren't that different when Miami sends back salary right? :)
Post Reply