D’Angelo Russell

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

lipoli390 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:KAT is not a championship level big so I don't really care if Russell is a championship level wing man. Dirk's title happened in a different era of basketball. It's not the same game to compare to. If KAT doesn't become an anchor we won't win a title. It's as simple as that. Get a defensive big next to him and guess who's still getting put in the PnR when it counts to get fried. It's a game of attacking matchups in the playoffs so you can't hide a big anywhere on the court defensively. Scoring and rebounding doesn't win games. We've had back to back highly efficient scoring and rebounding all-star machines and we can't even make the playoffs consistently so it's pretty clear that type of big is not championship caliber.


We'll just have to agree to disagree. Defense is a five-man enterprise. I don't see the League being that different from Nowitski's era except that perimeter scoring is even more important in today's game, which should reduce the importance of interior defense. I happen to believe that scoring and rebounding win games. But you need defense too. Defense alone won't win games without scoring. And rebounding is critical on both ends of the court.


The league has literally been revolutionized since Dirk's era. His patented fade away mid-range jumper is now the most avoided shot in all of basketball. He was also shooting less than 5 3's a game so he was getting most of his scoring from inside the arc which is the opposite of what teams want from their 4's in today's game. Defense is not a 5 man enterprise. You either need elite tall lanky wing defenders or an elite defensive big and we have neither. Tall lanky wing defenders are the hardest commodity in the league to come by and they usually end up being top 10-15 players. You aren't a championship caliber star if you need an actual star to help you get there. Look at Kevin Love in Cleveland. Look at Draymond without the actual stars on that team. They're elite role players on title teams and that's what KAT is if he doesn't become an anchor. Also rebounding literally doesn't matter. The Spurs were 9 games under .500 before the stoppage and had the 4th best defensive rebounding percentage in the league. 5 of the top 10 defensive rebounding teams are below .500. It's not a stat that greatly impacts winning. The Raptors and Rockets are bottom 6 in the league and are two of the best teams in the league. It's just not as important as you make it out to be so part of what KAT does really well is largely irrelevant while a part of what KAT does poorly on the defensive side of the ball is hugely relevant to our ability to win games. Unless Kawhi or PG or Giannis are walking through that door we aren't a championship caliber team with KAT and Russell.
User avatar
apollotsg [enjin:6592798]
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by apollotsg [enjin:6592798] »

We made the playoffs with Towns and Butler surrounded by some role players.

That team got pounded
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

kekgeek1 wrote:Do I think Dlo can be the 2nd best player on a contender? No I do not. Do I think Kat can be the best player on a contender? No I do not? Do I think Dlo and Kat can be the best 2 players on a consistent playoff team yes I do.

Its so hard to win a title, it has been since the Pistons in the mid 2000s where a team won a title where they didn't have a top 5 player in the NBA. Dlo and Kat are not in the discussion. It has been since 2011 (Mavs) so 9 years where a team had one of their top 2 players being a big man.

Its hard to win the title/be a contender. I honestly believe Dlo and Kat can both be part of a title team, I don't think they can be the best 2 players on the team. What is ok, if the Wolves had Leonard, LBJ, Durant, Giannis, Harden, they are title contenders. If they had players like Paul George or Jimmy Butler (skill wise not personality because I believe Jimmy thinks he has to be the guy) on this team I think the Wolves are not the favorite to win the title but are in the spot where injuries go their way they have a chance.

In the end we all want a winner here. I really hope our 2 max players can lead us to be a consistent playoff team and we can grow off of that. I honestly believe Wolves are in a better spot roster wise from where they were a year ago today.

Kek, I agree with most of what you say here. But it also illustrates what frustrates me so much about the Wolves. We've waited for ever to have a consistent playoff team, much less a true contender. But as long I've waited, I'm not interested in a consistent playoff team that can't contend. And as you said, we are not contending for a title with KAT and DLO as our best players. Not even close actually. I'm not even sure those two guys taking up our salary cap can even get to consistent playoff status. Rosas has done the same thing Thibs did, he put almost an immediate ceiling on the franchise. And that ceiling is far below title contender. This is what had me so disillusioned after the Russell trade. I wish i could be content with a good, not great team. But I just don't have that mindset. Maybe we will get lucky some day, too bad that's what it's going to take.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16259
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Lipoli390 »

khans2k5 wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:KAT is not a championship level big so I don't really care if Russell is a championship level wing man. Dirk's title happened in a different era of basketball. It's not the same game to compare to. If KAT doesn't become an anchor we won't win a title. It's as simple as that. Get a defensive big next to him and guess who's still getting put in the PnR when it counts to get fried. It's a game of attacking matchups in the playoffs so you can't hide a big anywhere on the court defensively. Scoring and rebounding doesn't win games. We've had back to back highly efficient scoring and rebounding all-star machines and we can't even make the playoffs consistently so it's pretty clear that type of big is not championship caliber.


We'll just have to agree to disagree. Defense is a five-man enterprise. I don't see the League being that different from Nowitski's era except that perimeter scoring is even more important in today's game, which should reduce the importance of interior defense. I happen to believe that scoring and rebounding win games. But you need defense too. Defense alone won't win games without scoring. And rebounding is critical on both ends of the court.


The league has literally been revolutionized since Dirk's era. His patented fade away mid-range jumper is now the most avoided shot in all of basketball. He was also shooting less than 5 3's a game so he was getting most of his scoring from inside the arc which is the opposite of what teams want from their 4's in today's game. Defense is not a 5 man enterprise. You either need elite tall lanky wing defenders or an elite defensive big and we have neither. Tall lanky wing defenders are the hardest commodity in the league to come by and they usually end up being top 10-15 players. You aren't a championship caliber star if you need an actual star to help you get there. Look at Kevin Love in Cleveland. Look at Draymond without the actual stars on that team. They're elite role players on title teams and that's what KAT is if he doesn't become an anchor. Also rebounding literally doesn't matter. The Spurs were 9 games under .500 before the stoppage and had the 4th best defensive rebounding percentage in the league. 5 of the top 10 defensive rebounding teams are below .500. It's not a stat that greatly impacts winning. The Raptors and Rockets are bottom 6 in the league and are two of the best teams in the league. It's just not as important as you make it out to be so part of what KAT does really well is largely irrelevant while a part of what KAT does poorly on the defensive side of the ball is hugely relevant to our ability to win games. Unless Kawhi or PG or Giannis are walking through that door we aren't a championship caliber team with KAT and Russell.


How much has the League changed since the 2018-19 season when the Nuggets finished with the 2nd best record in the West? Their two best players were Jokic and Murray. Jokic isn't a better defender or overall player than KAT. Is Murray a better defender or overall player than Russell?

I started this thread with a post that the KAT/Russell combo is unlikely to become a championship contender. So we seem to be in violent agreement on that point.

But I'm willing to acknowledge the possibility that this team could become a contender with KAT and Russell as the team's two best players with some defensive improvement from those two and the right supporting cast around them. We disagree on that. Your position is an absolute no chance the Wolves can contend with those two as the team's best. My position is that's it's unlikely but still possible. And Denver's recent success, even more than the Mavs' success with Dirk, suggests that your absolutism is overstated.

But as I said in my initial post, acquiring Russell was not the right move in my view if the goal is championship contention. KAT needs a Gary Peyton type PG. That's certainly not Russell. But I'm going to keep an open mind.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

I prefer to deal in probabilities as opposed to possibilities. Just about anything is possible. It's possible DLO makes an all NBA defensive team. It's possible Lebron decides to finish his career in Minnesota. Lloyd Christmas once celebrated he had a one in a million chance at landing Mary Swanson. It becomes problematic when you equate possibility with some semblance of real hope. The convergence of possibility and hope is not realistic and will lead to disappointment. Don't tell me what is possible, tell me what the probability is.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

lipoli390 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:KAT is not a championship level big so I don't really care if Russell is a championship level wing man. Dirk's title happened in a different era of basketball. It's not the same game to compare to. If KAT doesn't become an anchor we won't win a title. It's as simple as that. Get a defensive big next to him and guess who's still getting put in the PnR when it counts to get fried. It's a game of attacking matchups in the playoffs so you can't hide a big anywhere on the court defensively. Scoring and rebounding doesn't win games. We've had back to back highly efficient scoring and rebounding all-star machines and we can't even make the playoffs consistently so it's pretty clear that type of big is not championship caliber.


We'll just have to agree to disagree. Defense is a five-man enterprise. I don't see the League being that different from Nowitski's era except that perimeter scoring is even more important in today's game, which should reduce the importance of interior defense. I happen to believe that scoring and rebounding win games. But you need defense too. Defense alone won't win games without scoring. And rebounding is critical on both ends of the court.


The league has literally been revolutionized since Dirk's era. His patented fade away mid-range jumper is now the most avoided shot in all of basketball. He was also shooting less than 5 3's a game so he was getting most of his scoring from inside the arc which is the opposite of what teams want from their 4's in today's game. Defense is not a 5 man enterprise. You either need elite tall lanky wing defenders or an elite defensive big and we have neither. Tall lanky wing defenders are the hardest commodity in the league to come by and they usually end up being top 10-15 players. You aren't a championship caliber star if you need an actual star to help you get there. Look at Kevin Love in Cleveland. Look at Draymond without the actual stars on that team. They're elite role players on title teams and that's what KAT is if he doesn't become an anchor. Also rebounding literally doesn't matter. The Spurs were 9 games under .500 before the stoppage and had the 4th best defensive rebounding percentage in the league. 5 of the top 10 defensive rebounding teams are below .500. It's not a stat that greatly impacts winning. The Raptors and Rockets are bottom 6 in the league and are two of the best teams in the league. It's just not as important as you make it out to be so part of what KAT does really well is largely irrelevant while a part of what KAT does poorly on the defensive side of the ball is hugely relevant to our ability to win games. Unless Kawhi or PG or Giannis are walking through that door we aren't a championship caliber team with KAT and Russell.



How much has the League changed since the 2018-19 season when the Nuggets finished with the 2nd best record in the West? Their two best players were Jokic and Murray. Jokic isn't a better defender or overall player than KAT. Is Murray a better defender or overall player than Russell?

I started this thread with a post that the KAT/Russell combo is unlikely to become a championship contender. So we seem to be in violent agreement on that point.

But I'm willing to acknowledge the possibility that this team could become a contender with KAT and Russell as the team's two best players with some defensive improvement from those two and the right supporting cast around them. We disagree on that. Your position is an absolute no chance the Wolves can contend with those two as the team's best. My position is that's it's unlikely but still possible. And Denver's recent success, even more than the Mavs' success with Dirk, suggests that your absolutism is overstated.

But as I said in my initial post, acquiring Russell was not the right move in my view if the goal is championship contention. KAT needs a Gary Peyton type PG. That's certainly not Russell. But I'm going to keep an open mind.


How'd that Denver team do in the playoffs? Both series went 7 and they only won the first series because of home court (3-1 at home and 1-2 on the road). They have the best home court advantage in the league so getting a 2 seed by 1 game over the 3 and 4 shouldn't really be a bragging point about their contending status. They literally had the best home record in the West that season and were under .500 on the road. That's not a real contender. These arguments of the Mavs and Denver aren't really strong for our current situation and it's likelihood of our team seeing similar success. If we win it's not gonna be how those two teams won games.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24067
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Monster »

Dallas winning a championship included a couple factors that haven't been mentioned.

1. They played like a team through and through. It was a pretty special season and a special group and they added some players in season like Corey Brewer and Brian Cardinal. Lol

2. They played the Heat in the finals and the super team wasn't quite ready to win against a team like Dallas who played as a team. They were able to beat you in a few different ways. It was Honestly fun to watch.

Another consideration is...will teams continue to have 3 or more stars on them? Will some team that's supposed to win have an injury? Could the Wolves be a Dallas type team that puts things together at the right time? Probably not. Who 15 years ago was like "Jason Terry will be a key part of a championship team some day." Who would have thought JJ Barea would have started 3 finals games for the team that won?!??? I mean he isn't even supposed to be in the league. If people don't want to deal in the not really that probable and be pleasantly surprised that's cool. I'm with Abe let's get a team that's actually like kinda good. I'd be happy if we topped out as the next Memphis/Portland team. There is simply no shame in that IMO. If Memphis could have just added one more player...(could have been said for like what 5-6 years) who knows...but they had a good run. The Grizzlies won grinding games out. Maybe we do it with scoring.

One of the things about sports that's fun is there is something's that come unexpectedly. Kurt a Warner's story is unbelievable. Ben Wallace unstaffed Traded for Grant Hill and then wins a Championship. Heck Chauncey Billups was a pretty wild story on that team too. The list is long of guys and even teams that Did what they weren't supposed to (one of those would be the 1987 Twins for sure). I personally would like to see this group especially Russell and Beasley for a few months On the court etc and see what we have. Based on some top 10 threads on this forum right now it's clear to me winning isn't the only thing that brings enjoyment. I'm hoping we can find some joy in some of the guys in this current group...some winning would be nice too. Lol
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

Who knew that a team could be doomed from the beginning with two 24-year old players that have All-Star nominations under their belts and are both trending upwards in their progression? If literally any other franchise had both pieces -- Karl-Anthony Towns and D'Angelo Russell -- to build around, the discussion wouldn't be "can these two be contenders." It would be "when will these two be contenders."

The Wolves don't deserve any more optimism. They don't deserve any more excuses. They don't deserve anyone believing that they'll actually figure it out. However, two legitimate young stars have been paired up -- with potential to add another one in the upcoming off-season. Are the young stars flawed? Unquestionably -- although every player outside of the top-five or six is as well. Is the team makeup currently flawed? Absolutely.

But is this team going to get better? I believe so. Are more impactful pieces going to be added in support of Towns and Russell? I think that's a fair assumption. Can the front office, as well as the coaching staff, perform in their roles at a high enough level to compete with perennial league juggernauts? That's to be determined, however, if you compare this roster to the one they had a year ago, I think you could argue that the feeling is mostly positive.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by kekgeek »

lipoli390 wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:Do I think Dlo can be the 2nd best player on a contender? No I do not. Do I think Kat can be the best player on a contender? No I do not? Do I think Dlo and Kat can be the best 2 players on a consistent playoff team yes I do.

Its so hard to win a title, it has been since the Pistons in the mid 2000s where a team won a title where they didn't have a top 5 player in the NBA. Dlo and Kat are not in the discussion. It has been since 2011 (Mavs) so 9 years where a team had one of their top 2 players being a big man.

Its hard to win the title/be a contender. I honestly believe Dlo and Kat can both be part of a title team, I don't think they can be the best 2 players on the team. What is ok, if the Wolves had Leonard, LBJ, Durant, Giannis, Harden, they are title contenders. If they had players like Paul George or Jimmy Butler (skill wise not personality because I believe Jimmy thinks he has to be the guy) on this team I think the Wolves are not the favorite to win the title but are in the spot where injuries go their way they have a chance.

In the end we all want a winner here. I really hope our 2 max players can lead us to be a consistent playoff team and we can grow off of that. I honestly believe Wolves are in a better spot roster wise from where they were a year ago today.


Kekgeek - You make some really important points in this post. The gist of your post as I see it is that this isn't necessarily an all-or-nothing proposition. Instead, there are gradations between where the Wolves have been (perennial bottom feeders) and championship contention, which we'd all like to see this team achieve. Some additional thoughts on your post:

1. Are the Wolves in a better spot roster-wise than they were a year ago? Your answer was yes and I agree completely. We are much better in my view.

2. Can this team be a perennial playoff team with KAT at DLO as the team's two best players? Your answer was yes and again I agree completely. Replacing Wiggins, Gorgui and Teague with DLO, Beasley and Johnson significantly improved the roster. The development of Naz Reid, Jordan McLaughlin and Okogie this past season further improved this team over where it was a year ago. So even if KAT and DLO don't improve at all defensively, I see this team making the playoffs next season (assuming we have one), assuming it is well coached and the key guys stay healthy. Is it enough for me as a fan for the Wolves to be a perennial playoff team as a 6th, 7th or 8th seed but not a meaningful threat to appear in the conference finals? Well, it's not enough for me, but it's certainly better than being a perennial bottom feeder like we've been.

3. Is this team a title-contender with KAT and DLO as the team's two best players? Your answer was no and I generally agree. However, I do see a path to title contention even with those two as our best players. I suppose it's important to first define what we mean by the Wolves becoming a title contender. To me, it means they have a good shot at finishing in the 4 or 5 in the West with a reasonable chance of making the Conference finals.

The path I see for the Wolves involves some improved defense from both KAT and DLO even if neither one becomes anything close to a defensive stopper. As young as they are, I still believe both guys can improve defensively. The path also involves surrounding those two with a lot of tough-minded, defensive players. There's no one formula for being a top tier team in the NBA. The only major change from earlier eras is that you need more three-point shooting and, with less contact allowed, you have to focus more on out-scoring your opponents than holding down their point total. But in the end, it's about scoring more points than your opponent. If you're team is great on one side of the ball, they don't have to be as good on the other side. If you out-rebound your opponent, you increase your opportunities to score while reducing you opponents' scoring chances and that helps your team both offensively and defensively. Red Auerbach used to say that rebounds and steals/turnovers were the most important stats because those categories determined the number of possessions, which in turn had a huge impact on the outcome. Red used to shout, "get me the ball" from the bench when he was coaching. In other words, rebound or steal it and don't turn it over. Moreover, this is still a team game on both sides of the ball. No one player at any one position decides a team's fate. That's always been true and it's especially true in today's game which is often referred to as position-less.

Can a team be a title contender when one of their two best players is a big? The answer is definitely yes if that big man is like KAT -- that is, a big who can score from anywhere, hit over 40% of his threes and pass the ball effectively. That's why Denver can be a title contender with Jokic as one of their two best and the same holds for the Wolves with KAT.

Ideally, KAT would be paired with an allstar who is also a defensive stopper. Instead, Rosas has paired him (for now) with DLO. It's even worse that the other key acquisition at the trade deadline, Beasley, isn't a good defender either. So this isn't an ideal roster if you're thinking title contention, but I definitely think it's enough to bring playoff basketball back to Minnesota. At this point, I'll take that over the alternative we've been living with for so long. And who knows what happens once this young team begins getting playoff experience. Perhaps it will push KAT and/or DLO to another level of intensity and defensive achievement. Perhaps it will attract some tough-minded talented free agents to join the team. Meanwhile, perhaps we'll get lucky in this year's draft and end up with an allstar talent who also has elite defensive chops. Who knows, maybe Culver becomes that guy. So a lot of things can happen over the next few years with this young team that's about to have a high lottery pick, a mid-first round pick and a top pick in the 2nd round this year. Right now, I'm focused on hoping we have a 2020/21 season and that I can actually go to games. Then I just hope this team can make the playoffs. Right now, with this roster, I think they will.


Nice response. Ya we had a different perspective on championship contender. I do think the wolves could have a Nuggets, Jazz or Blazers type run. Like the Blazers consistently make the playoffs, sometimes get out of the 1st round, last year made the WCF but really didn't have a chance to win the whole thing. Have years like this year where they are fighting to make the playoffs. I could see the Wolves having a similar run as the Blazer have had.

On the big man thing, Anthony Davis is in good shape to win a title this year as the 2nd best player on his team. I just think it is tough to win with a big man. I mean I think the Nuggets are "fake" contenders and we are coming up on 10 years where a big man hasn't been a top 2 player on there team.

Dlo is the X factor. He could go up a level. I was looking at his 23 year old season compared to James Harden 23 year old season.

Dlo: 23.1 pts 6.3 asts 3.9 rebs 42.6 FG% 36.7 3pt% 80.9 FT%

Harden: 25.9 pts 5.8 asts 4.9 rebs 43.8 FG% 36.8 3pt% 85.1 FT%

Now James Harden has better advance stats and got to the free throw line a lot more. Im just saying it is possible for Dlo to go up another level.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by kekgeek »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:Do I think Dlo can be the 2nd best player on a contender? No I do not. Do I think Kat can be the best player on a contender? No I do not? Do I think Dlo and Kat can be the best 2 players on a consistent playoff team yes I do.

Its so hard to win a title, it has been since the Pistons in the mid 2000s where a team won a title where they didn't have a top 5 player in the NBA. Dlo and Kat are not in the discussion. It has been since 2011 (Mavs) so 9 years where a team had one of their top 2 players being a big man.

Its hard to win the title/be a contender. I honestly believe Dlo and Kat can both be part of a title team, I don't think they can be the best 2 players on the team. What is ok, if the Wolves had Leonard, LBJ, Durant, Giannis, Harden, they are title contenders. If they had players like Paul George or Jimmy Butler (skill wise not personality because I believe Jimmy thinks he has to be the guy) on this team I think the Wolves are not the favorite to win the title but are in the spot where injuries go their way they have a chance.

In the end we all want a winner here. I really hope our 2 max players can lead us to be a consistent playoff team and we can grow off of that. I honestly believe Wolves are in a better spot roster wise from where they were a year ago today.

Kek, I agree with most of what you say here. But it also illustrates what frustrates me so much about the Wolves. We've waited for ever to have a consistent playoff team, much less a true contender. But as long I've waited, I'm not interested in a consistent playoff team that can't contend. And as you said, we are not contending for a title with KAT and DLO as our best players. Not even close actually. I'm not even sure those two guys taking up our salary cap can even get to consistent playoff status. Rosas has done the same thing Thibs did, he put almost an immediate ceiling on the franchise. And that ceiling is far below title contender. This is what had me so disillusioned after the Russell trade. I wish i could be content with a good, not great team. But I just don't have that mindset. Maybe we will get lucky some day, too bad that's what it's going to take.


My thing is what did you want Rosas to do. He could of stayed pat and we are still massively capped on potential with Wiggins on a max contract, Cov getting older and not having the extra 1st this year (I understand we are giving up our 1st more then likely next year).

Wiggins sort of screwed our franchise, he didn't live up to expectations, that is a fact, he was going to get a max from another team, it is hard to not give Wiggins the max when we did. I mean we can go back to when we gave Wiggins the extension and I would say 90% of this board agreed with the extension and some said that they would rather have Wiggins over Embiid.

In the end you need a top 7ish player to win a title in todays NBA. LBJ the wolves never had a chance, Durant the Wolves never had a chance, Davis the Wolves never had a chance, Harden the wolves never had a chance(Remember Kahn almost got a deal done with Derrick Williams as the center piece), Kawhi the Wolves realistically never had a chance, Curry, Kahn screwed up picking Flynn and Rubio. Giannis the Wolves screwed up selecting Shabazz over Giannis.


So in the last 10ish years the wolves have had 2 legit shots at not being "capped out" as you say. You need generational talents to win a title the wolves had a chance at 2 in recent memory. So Im not saying Rosas is perfect but I want a consistent playoff team and hopefully the wolves can draft the next generational talent like Kawhi or Giannis in the mid to late 1st round
Post Reply