KAT TRADE IDEAS

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Jester1534
Posts: 3766
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT TRADE IDEAS

Post by Jester1534 »

Its crazy in 6 months we've gone to trading the #1 pick for another established Star. To talking about trading KAT. Thats quite feat by Rosas.
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8173
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT TRADE IDEAS

Post by bleedspeed »

Jester1534 wrote:Its crazy in 6 months we've gone to trading the #1 pick for another established Star. To talking about trading KAT. Thats quite feat by Rosas.


You betcha!
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16252
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT TRADE IDEAS

Post by Lipoli390 »

ALLDAYCHRIS wrote:
Hicks123 wrote:My opinion....every player should always be considered in deal to make your team better. Period.

That said, they only trade KAT for deal similar to what Lakers gave up for Davis.

Ingram (high ceiling prospect), Lonzo (mid-tier prospect), Hart (long-term role player), 3 1st round picks.

This certainly limits teams, but they are out there. Atlanta was mentioned, and I would say they are a realistic trade partner IMO. I believe Atlanta is making a HUGE mistake in apparently prioritizing Trae over Collins. Trae is SOOOOOOO overrated, but the league has shited towards these guys than can draw bogus fouls.

But what does that look like?

What if they offered Collins, Capela and 3 unprotected 1st round picks? I would certainly consider.


I think Atlanta would be a good trade partner but I would have to get hunter involved if I'm giving up KAT

Something like KAT for Hunter, Collins, and picks + salary filler

or

Kat, Naz, and okogie or culver for capela, collins, and hunter. I'm not sure they would give up that much though.


That would be a great trade for Atlanta. I'd consider that deal for the Wolves if we kept Okogie or Naz and also received at least 3 future unprotected first round picks.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT TRADE IDEAS

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

lipoli390 wrote:
ALLDAYCHRIS wrote:
Hicks123 wrote:My opinion....every player should always be considered in deal to make your team better. Period.

That said, they only trade KAT for deal similar to what Lakers gave up for Davis.

Ingram (high ceiling prospect), Lonzo (mid-tier prospect), Hart (long-term role player), 3 1st round picks.

This certainly limits teams, but they are out there. Atlanta was mentioned, and I would say they are a realistic trade partner IMO. I believe Atlanta is making a HUGE mistake in apparently prioritizing Trae over Collins. Trae is SOOOOOOO overrated, but the league has shited towards these guys than can draw bogus fouls.

But what does that look like?

What if they offered Collins, Capela and 3 unprotected 1st round picks? I would certainly consider.


I think Atlanta would be a good trade partner but I would have to get hunter involved if I'm giving up KAT

Something like KAT for Hunter, Collins, and picks + salary filler

or

Kat, Naz, and okogie or culver for capela, collins, and hunter. I'm not sure they would give up that much though.


That would be a great trade for Atlanta. I'd consider that deal for the Wolves if we kept Okogie or Naz and also received at least 3 future unprotected first round picks.



Well... then that's no longer a good trade for Atlanta. Hunter is playing very well.

17/7/2 on 50/40/87 splits.
Post Reply