Re: Andrew Wiggins last 10 games
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2015 10:56 pm
Someone make a LaVine last 10 games thread. Damn impressive in his own right.
Wolves fan commiserate here!
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=27821
kekgeek1 wrote:Just playing devils advocate for Lavine. Dieng was a beast at this time last year. This is the time anthony Randolph always used to shine
WildWolf2813 wrote:Rubio, Bazz, Wiggins.
it's all we have. I wouldn't lose sleep if we dealt or cut everyone else.
TheFuture wrote:kekgeek1 wrote:Just playing devils advocate for Lavine. Dieng was a beast at this time last year. This is the time anthony Randolph always used to shine
I know you were just playing devil's advocate, but in Lavine's defense he is a 19/20 year old player this year who played 20 mins a game in college off the bench. Dieng was 22 last year and a 3 year starter in college (I believe?).
Carlos Danger wrote:WildWolf2813 wrote:Rubio, Bazz, Wiggins.
it's all we have. I wouldn't lose sleep if we dealt or cut everyone else.
I'd include LaVine in that group. I know it's garbage games, but his last five he's averaging:
17.8 points/5.4 rebounds and 5.8 assists. It only five games, but it's a nice "flash" of what this kid is capable of doing. He's still so young - nobody really expected this kid to be NBA ready so his early struggles were not a surprise. But he's starting to hold his own now....and who knows what his ceiling might be. You hold onto guys like that IMO.
WildWolf2813 wrote:Carlos Danger wrote:WildWolf2813 wrote:Rubio, Bazz, Wiggins.
it's all we have. I wouldn't lose sleep if we dealt or cut everyone else.
I'd include LaVine in that group. I know it's garbage games, but his last five he's averaging:
17.8 points/5.4 rebounds and 5.8 assists. It only five games, but it's a nice "flash" of what this kid is capable of doing. He's still so young - nobody really expected this kid to be NBA ready so his early struggles were not a surprise. But he's starting to hold his own now....and who knows what his ceiling might be. You hold onto guys like that IMO.
I can't include LaVine.
I've seen too many guys who look good in games that mean nothing get undue praise from us.
McCants, Kirk Snyder, Darko, Flynn, Foye, Randolph (he's the poster child for the point I'm making) Rhino, lest we not forget Dieng last year.
What happened to all of them?
I'm not gonna buy into LaVine until he and the others can actually win these games instead of ending the season on a 12 game losing streak like they're about to.
TheFuture wrote:WildWolf2813 wrote:Carlos Danger wrote:WildWolf2813 wrote:Rubio, Bazz, Wiggins.
it's all we have. I wouldn't lose sleep if we dealt or cut everyone else.
I'd include LaVine in that group. I know it's garbage games, but his last five he's averaging:
17.8 points/5.4 rebounds and 5.8 assists. It only five games, but it's a nice "flash" of what this kid is capable of doing. He's still so young - nobody really expected this kid to be NBA ready so his early struggles were not a surprise. But he's starting to hold his own now....and who knows what his ceiling might be. You hold onto guys like that IMO.
I can't include LaVine.
I've seen too many guys who look good in games that mean nothing get undue praise from us.
McCants, Kirk Snyder, Darko, Flynn, Foye, Randolph (he's the poster child for the point I'm making) Rhino, lest we not forget Dieng last year.
What happened to all of them?
I'm not gonna buy into LaVine until he and the others can actually win these games instead of ending the season on a 12 game losing streak like they're about to.
Why include Wiggins then? Almost every game this year has meant nothing, except for the fact of watching both Wiggins and LaVine improve.
WildWolf2813 wrote:
I can't include LaVine.
I've seen too many guys who look good in games that mean nothing get undue praise from us.
McCants, Kirk Snyder, Darko, Flynn, Foye, Randolph (he's the poster child for the point I'm making) Rhino, lest we not forget Dieng last year.
What happened to all of them?
WildWolf2813 wrote:TheFuture wrote:
Why include Wiggins then? Almost every game this year has meant nothing, except for the fact of watching both Wiggins and LaVine improve.
I'm not gonna dismiss Wiggins except Wiggins played well all season, not just March and April, and he has a lot more work to do than what we think.
TheGrey08 wrote:WildWolf2813 wrote:TheFuture wrote:
Why include Wiggins then? Almost every game this year has meant nothing, except for the fact of watching both Wiggins and LaVine improve.
I'm not gonna dismiss Wiggins except Wiggins played well all season, not just March and April, and he has a lot more work to do than what we think.
Was Wiggins playing out of position/learning a new position as a rookie? No? didn't think so.
People seriously don't get how insane it is to throw a ROOKIE SG (who didn't play any PG in college) into the STARTING PG role. Think about that for a while and let that sink in.
Just wait. Flip is going to look like a genius down the line b/c of how he has handled Lavine.