Malik Beasley S&T?

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by thedoper »

KG4Ever wrote:
thedoper wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
thedoper wrote:
Camden0916 wrote:Julius Randle would be pretty sweet.


Agreed.


You liked Bazz too.


So what?


It gives me some basis for understanding why you would like Randle.


Why did Flip love Bazz? Since you have so much understanding from one player.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:Julius Randle would be pretty sweet.


I have to disagree with you on this one, Randle is grossly overpaid and not that good.


I'm still concerned that Malik Beasley is going to be egregiously overpaid. Julius Randle would immediately be the best four on this team with a play style that fits what the Wolves want to do, at least offensively. Randle also doesn't get intimidated by anyone and this team needs guys like that. I'd be all for it.


Julius Randle's turns the ball over more than Ricky Rubio. That's horrible for a big to be worse than a point guard. Plus, he can't shoot well from outside and his defensive is not that great. Plus, I don't want to touch his contract. And if Rosas punted on Wiseman, why the h*ll would he want Randle? I'd only be interested in Randle is if we got some nice draft picks to take on his contract.


Randle has the same career AST/TO as Towns. Why would you compare a big to a point guard in that regard? Weird. He also wouldn't be handling the ball as much in Minnesota as he has the last couple seasons. Randle isn't a prominent three-point shooter, but what four on this roster is? Hernangomez? Randle does a lot of other things much better than him and every other four on this roster.

But you definitely view players differently than me so this is right on brand.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16258
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by Lipoli390 »

Camden wrote:Jon K: Timberwolves source to @TheAthleticMIN: No conversations about trading Malik Beasley. There is belief he and Anthony Edwards can play together on the wings. "The focus is to have Beasley back"


Well, that pretty much kills the dream. :) I believe this report for two reasons. First, it's Jon K, who is highly reliable and well plugged into the Wolves organization. Second, Rosas has been intently focused on bringing Beasley back since last February when he acquired him. A friend of mine who knows people in the Wolves organization said that Rosas started recruiting Beasley to return the moment Malik arrived here. Rosas falls in love with certain players - DLO, Beasley and Rubio are three of them. And Rosas isn't going to give up on one of his signature acquisitions last February.

All I can say is this. First, I think Beasley is seriously depraved and not the sort of guy I'd want to count on goring forward. Second, I just hope the Wolves don't overpay him. Maybe the Knicks will make a sign-and-trade offer Rosas can't refuse.
User avatar
TheFuture
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by TheFuture »

kekgeek1 wrote:Per Vincent Goodwill

Malik Beasley has been made available in trades and the Knicks are interested.

Per Dane Moore

Beasley wants to play on a coast but wants to get paid 1st


Malik Beasley needs to shut his mouth and prove through intelligent action. He is in no area to demand a single thing. If any of this is true, and he keeps this up, Malik is becoming the NBA's Antonio Brown
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16258
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by Lipoli390 »

TheFuture wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:Per Vincent Goodwill

Malik Beasley has been made available in trades and the Knicks are interested.

Per Dane Moore

Beasley wants to play on a coast but wants to get paid 1st


Malik Beasley needs to shut his mouth and prove through intelligent action. He is in no area to demand a single thing. If any of this is true, and he keeps this up, Malik is becoming the NBA's Antonio Brown


But Future - Malik is part of our Timberwolves family. We always stand by our family members no matter what. We love him and want him to stay with us no matter how much money be demands or how badly he wants to leave and play on a coast. :)
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

Camden wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:Julius Randle would be pretty sweet.


I have to disagree with you on this one, Randle is grossly overpaid and not that good.


I'm still concerned that Malik Beasley is going to be egregiously overpaid. Julius Randle would immediately be the best four on this team with a play style that fits what the Wolves want to do, at least offensively. Randle also doesn't get intimidated by anyone and this team needs guys like that. I'd be all for it.


Julius Randle's turns the ball over more than Ricky Rubio. That's horrible for a big to be worse than a point guard. Plus, he can't shoot well from outside and his defensive is not that great. Plus, I don't want to touch his contract. And if Rosas punted on Wiseman, why the h*ll would he want Randle? I'd only be interested in Randle is if we got some nice draft picks to take on his contract.


Randle has the same career AST/TO as Towns.



One quibble with that... the two men are trending in opposite directions.

Town's assists keep going up... 4.4 per game last season. 3.1 TOs. Randle averaged 3.1 assists and a career high 3.0 TOs.

Interestingly, both men are notorious for offensive fouls... with Towns leading the league in 2019.
User avatar
TheFuture
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by TheFuture »

Randle is only a decent player with the ball in his hands. He is not good on the other end. We dont need more of those. We just drafted another #1. We need complimentary off-ball players all around.

I would go for Nance Jr. before Randle, and I personally do not like either idea.
User avatar
BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520]
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520] »

I miss John Randle.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24061
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by Monster »

BizarroJerry wrote:I miss John Randle.


Sign him up!!! I'm pretty sure he would add to our unique ability to foul 3 point shooters!
User avatar
WildWolf2813
Posts: 3467
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Malik Beasley S&T?

Post by WildWolf2813 »

We wouldn't get a player back for Beasley nor should we. Get a first or a couple of seconds. If not, keep him.


But let's not get Randle. He's not worth it.
Post Reply