lipoli390 wrote:bleedspeed177 wrote:lipoli390 wrote:Monster - I didn't see the report about us offering CJ $10 million per year. That's too much in my view. I don't think he's getting that much from Toronto. If the cost of getting CJ would have been $10 million per year, I'd have passed on him as well. Watching guys like Patterson, Ilyasova and Teodosic sign for less than $7 million per year suggests that the Wolves were offering more than market value for the guys they wanted.
I wonder if it is a better strategy when you are under the cap to wait it out. See who is left and then be able to offer about 3M a year for 3 guys rather than pay one bench guy 10M. a
That's my thinking, Bleed. Unless there's a really key player available for a bargain price that you can't pass on. Otherwise, the way free agency has unfolded this summer, it seems clear that there's a lot of merit to waiting and getting decent bench role players for bargain prices. As an example, I thought Luc at the vet minimum was a great deal for the Rockets. Even earlier this summer we had very good role players like Patterson signing for $6.5 million. Then there were Teo, Ilyasova, Dedmon and others who were signed in the $6-7 million per year range. I believe Tyrke Evans signed for about $3.5 million per year. And most of these guys were signed to 1-2 year deals. So against that backdrop I don't think it makes sense in this market to pay $10 million plus for a role player. There are some exceptions, I think. For example, I think the Bucks did well shelling out $11 million per year to Tony Snell given his two-way play and youth (mid 20s). But for guys like Taj and CJ Miles, I'd say no. Both strike me as $7 million per year players in today's market.
It's worth remembering some of the guys that signed those cheaper deals signed for that much because that is all those teams had to offer. Patterson signed with OKC for the exception they had. Miles took a bit less than the full midlevel because the Raptors wanted to try and stay under the tax. Sometimes I think teams that actually have the cap space end up with little leverage to get guys for cheaper deals.
This isn't the NFL where scheme matters as much but I'm sure every team has a list of guys they think fit their culture scheme or fit with players they have better than others. For example Tyreke Evans for the price Memphis got him was great. Here he would have been nice but his shooting is suspect and so the fit may not have been great. Memphis can use a guy that can do something off the dribble. Thibs clearly values Taj more than just a role player. If that's the evaluation (whether you agree with the evaluation or not) I think that process can be respected. To me there are some parallels of Thibs brining in Taj to when Flip brought in KG. Of course Thibs didn't give up a long term asset to get Taj (used cap space) and Taj can clearly still play as well. It remains to be seen how this all works out.
It's a bit crazy how some guys seem to just be calling around looking for work for the vet min and a year ago they may have been getting decent multiyear deals. If we end up with 2 guys we would have been willing to give say 5 million or so a few weeks ago then the Wolves will have success. With so few guys signed they are going to start looking like a team were even if Butler and Wiggins play a ton of minutes there could still be a decent role for one more backup wing.