D’Angelo Russell

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

bleedspeed177 wrote:I get it. We are betting on 2 guys that were ranked 18th and 48th at the beginning of the 19-20 year to lead us to the playoffs after leading their teams to the 2 worst records in the West. We will dominate against Dallas, Denver, and Memphis who's cores is just as young and already winning.

Make space for the banners.

It's called manufacturing hope Bleed. Even if some of the traditional Western powers continue to come back to the pack, there are still young teams out there with better nuclei than we have.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24067
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Monster »

bleedspeed177 wrote:I get it. We are betting on 2 guys that were ranked 18th and 48th at the beginning of the 19-20 year to lead us to the playoffs after leading their teams to the 2 worst records in the West. We will dominate against Dallas, Denver, and Memphis who's cores is just as young and already winning.

Make space for the banners.


Let's put it this way. A few months ago the hope was Wiggins would finally get it. I'm ok betting on Russell being something more impactful than Wiggins and I was a person that held out more hope for Wiggins than most and that's probably still the case. Sure that may be a low bar but I'm not looking for banners. I'd be happy to have the success and failures of the Vikings the past few years for this franchise. That would be a MASSIVE step forward from what we have been seeing much of that timeframe as Wolves fans.
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8173
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by bleedspeed »

Being the Cleveland Browns of the NBA sucks.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by kekgeek »

bleedspeed177 wrote:I get it. We are betting on 2 guys that were ranked 18th and 48th at the beginning of the 19-20 year to lead us to the playoffs after leading their teams to the 2 worst records in the West. We will dominate against Dallas, Denver, and Memphis who's cores is just as young and already winning.

Make space for the banners.


To be fair Kat and Dlo literally played one game together last year. To say they lead us to the 3rd worse record in the NBA I don't know how fair that is.
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8173
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by bleedspeed »

kekgeek1 wrote:
bleedspeed177 wrote:I get it. We are betting on 2 guys that were ranked 18th and 48th at the beginning of the 19-20 year to lead us to the playoffs after leading their teams to the 2 worst records in the West. We will dominate against Dallas, Denver, and Memphis who's cores is just as young and already winning.

Make space for the banners.


To be fair Kat and Dlo literally played one game together last year. To say they lead us to the 3rd worse record in the NBA I don't know how fair that is.


I was saying DLO with Warriors and KAT with Wolves. 34 wins between both teams which is 2 more wins combined than Memphis which was lead by a pair of 20-year-old rookies.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24067
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Monster »

bleedspeed177 wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
bleedspeed177 wrote:I get it. We are betting on 2 guys that were ranked 18th and 48th at the beginning of the 19-20 year to lead us to the playoffs after leading their teams to the 2 worst records in the West. We will dominate against Dallas, Denver, and Memphis who's cores is just as young and already winning.

Make space for the banners.


To be fair Kat and Dlo literally played one game together last year. To say they lead us to the 3rd worse record in the NBA I don't know how fair that is.


I was saying DLO with Warriors and KAT with Wolves. 34 wins between both teams which is 2 more wins combined than Memphis which was lead by a pair of 20-year-old rookies.


And how does the Warriors roster Russell was playing on compare to teams that won more games? How did it compare to some franchise's G-league teams?
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

monsterpile wrote:
bleedspeed177 wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
bleedspeed177 wrote:I get it. We are betting on 2 guys that were ranked 18th and 48th at the beginning of the 19-20 year to lead us to the playoffs after leading their teams to the 2 worst records in the West. We will dominate against Dallas, Denver, and Memphis who's cores is just as young and already winning.

Make space for the banners.


To be fair Kat and Dlo literally played one game together last year. To say they lead us to the 3rd worse record in the NBA I don't know how fair that is.


I was saying DLO with Warriors and KAT with Wolves. 34 wins between both teams which is 2 more wins combined than Memphis which was lead by a pair of 20-year-old rookies.


And how does the Warriors roster Russell was playing on compare to teams that won more games? How did it compare to some franchise's G-league teams?



That's what scares me...

As bad as the Warriors were... and as little as they cared about winning...

The Wolves won only 4 more games.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24067
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by Monster »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
bleedspeed177 wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
bleedspeed177 wrote:I get it. We are betting on 2 guys that were ranked 18th and 48th at the beginning of the 19-20 year to lead us to the playoffs after leading their teams to the 2 worst records in the West. We will dominate against Dallas, Denver, and Memphis who's cores is just as young and already winning.

Make space for the banners.


To be fair Kat and Dlo literally played one game together last year. To say they lead us to the 3rd worse record in the NBA I don't know how fair that is.


I was saying DLO with Warriors and KAT with Wolves. 34 wins between both teams which is 2 more wins combined than Memphis which was lead by a pair of 20-year-old rookies.


And how does the Warriors roster Russell was playing on compare to teams that won more games? How did it compare to some franchise's G-league teams?



That's what scares me...

As bad as the Warriors were... and as little as they cared about winning...

The Wolves won only 4 more games.


Something to consider.

Josh Okogie and Jarrett Culver led the wolves in minutes this season. If I told you that to start the season how many wins would you have predicted?
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8173
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by bleedspeed »

Good question. I would say 20-25.
User avatar
TAFKASP
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: D’Angelo Russell

Post by TAFKASP »

bleedspeed177 wrote:Good question. I would say 20-25.


I'd say 50, but then I always say 50.
Post Reply