Young for Garnett trade discussed

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
Post Reply
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10164
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

60WinTim wrote:
worldK wrote:Also, this is rubio and wiggins team now. They need and will learn to win in this league.

Kg cant play anymore. Based on history, guys who cant go anymore really doesnt inspire anything. What is wig, zach, bazz and ab going to learn from a washout player.

Intensity. Right now Rubio is the only one who exhibits intensity. It would be my hope that KG's presence would raise everyone's intensity, and maybe that would carry forward beyond this year.




To be fair, I don't know how easy it will be for a nearly 40 year old guy with very diminished skills and a very different mindset to connect with kids half his age.
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 7843
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by 60WinTim »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:To be fair, I don't know how easy it will be for a nearly 40 year old guy with very diminished skills and a very different mindset to connect with kids half his age.
Well, he will be their future boss...
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 7843
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by 60WinTim »

Sounds like Flip & company have sold KG on the idea!

Marc Stein ?@ESPNSteinLine 2m2 minutes ago
Hearing cautious optimism emanating from Minneapolis that Kevin Garnett is leaning toward waiving no-trade clause and returning to Minnesota
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10164
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

60WinTim wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:To be fair, I don't know how easy it will be for a nearly 40 year old guy with very diminished skills and a very different mindset to connect with kids half his age.
Well, he will be their future boss...



Might make it even more difficult to "connect" in any meaningful way.
User avatar
Phenom
Posts: 3037
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by Phenom »

Budinger better be Brooklyn bound.

This could be a nice cap clearing move if nothing else.
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 7843
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by 60WinTim »

McHale fucked this organization over when he fired Flip and traded KG. How fitting is it to have Flip back, the team on the verge of turning the corner, and KG coming back to complete the circle.

I love it! It's going to happen. You can complain about it, or you can embrace it.
User avatar
60WinTim
Posts: 7843
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by 60WinTim »

Phenom's_Revenge wrote:Budinger better be Brooklyn bound.

This could be a nice cap clearing move if nothing else.

That would be pretty sweet if Bud was included as well. Even more money to spend next year!
User avatar
alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741]
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741] »

60WinTim wrote:
Phenom's_Revenge wrote:Budinger better be Brooklyn bound.

This could be a nice cap clearing move if nothing else.

That would be pretty sweet if Bud was included as well. Even more money to spend next year!


To sign who? Some other player that we'll all think they overpaid for then in another few years when we trade THAT guy, then THAT move will be great because we got rid of THAT guy.

What a successful circle that is
User avatar
BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520]
Posts: 3290
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520] »

Phenom's_Revenge wrote:Budinger better be Brooklyn bound.

This could be a nice cap clearing move if nothing else.


Nice alliteration there Phenom. Well played.
User avatar
Phenom
Posts: 3037
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Young for Garnett trade discussed

Post by Phenom »

alexftbl8181 wrote:
60WinTim wrote:
Phenom's_Revenge wrote:Budinger better be Brooklyn bound.

This could be a nice cap clearing move if nothing else.

That would be pretty sweet if Bud was included as well. Even more money to spend next year!


To sign who? Some other player that we'll all think they overpaid for then in another few years when we trade THAT guy, then THAT move will be great because we got rid of THAT guy.

What a successful circle that is


Then why are you here?
Post Reply