AbeVigodaLive wrote:Camden wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:Camden wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:Camden wrote:I would agree that D'Angelo Russell was sloppy and lackadaisical in the first half -- along with most of the Timberwolves who had played to that point -- but he was also the only player that really showed up in the second half for Minnesota besides Luka Garza and Matt Ryan late. Call me crazy, but I think you have to judge a game of basketball while looking at both halves of play.
They whittled the deficit down to seven with 1:14 left in the game primarily due to hot shooting and scrambling defense. It was still very much a contest at that point and the guys that were on the floor deserve credit for bringing it that close, especially Garza and Ryan considering they came off the bench cold.
Hopefully they all show up against Denver on Sunday. They need to right the ship immediately and avoid letting losses build up consecutively. That should feel like a playoff game.
Getting to within 7 points late in an NBA game...
Nah. I'm not giving this team any credit after being down 21 to the Orlando Magic's 2nd unit... specifically because of a lack of effort.
Those types of feel-good faux comebacks are dime a dozen in the NBA... for losing teams. We've seen hundreds of them in Minnesota over the years. It's meaningless (except for the stat sheet for individual players).
This game was decided early and it led to a 21-point deficit. Russell needs to be one of the guys who takes the heat for that.
It's not about it being a feel-good game. That's not the case whatsoever, but that unit did make a legitimate comeback when it looked like it was over, and they do deserve credit for that when we talk about the game in totality. A couple of different bounces late and Minnesota may have stolen one that they didn't deserve to win specifically because of that unit's competitiveness, which absolutely includes D'Angelo Russell, for what it's worth. Fire that DVR back up and watch it since it appears that you cut it off early.
Better efforts were needed across the board. It's tough to win when your best player puts up a stinker. It's tough to win when you turn the ball over 20 times -- 10 of which came from the starting backcourt. It's tough to win when you allow 52-percent shooting from three, and lose the points in the paint battle by 12. There's blame everywhere to be had.
It seems odd that we can't or won't recognize all of that while also crediting several guys who made the game stealable in the closing minutes when they could have mailed it in after halftime like mostly everyone else.
Nope.
I'm been very clear that moral victories (for not totally quitting after loafing to a 22-point deficit) no longer cut it. I find it amusing people would give credit to a few guys for NOT mailing it in.
Cutting a big lead to 7 is so pedestrian in the NBA by the way.
It's not a moral victory. It's not a feel-good game. You watched the first half or so, turned the game off in disgust, and the rest of what happened doesn't actually matter to you. Seems peculiar to me to simply ignore a half of basketball and then have strong feelings about the game overall, but whatever. Do your thing.
LOL.
I think you're missing my point. Once a team is down 20+ points specifically because of a lack of effort... it's pretty meaningless what happens over a 10-minute span after the game is already decided.
Everybody who's ever watched the NBA knows about "garbage time"... even those with a very vested interest in one particular player.
[Note: Garza wasn't part of the massive underachievement for the first 30+ minutes of the game, so I think it's fair to give that guy credit should he be part of any comeback. But to praise a guy like Russell for garbage time buckets after being one of the guys directly responsible for the collapse... and then stay on that hill to the point of condescension to other posters just because you're emotionally attached to championing for said player at this point... LOL. ]
Reading comprehension is lost here, apparently. LOL
There was blame to be had all around for the large deficit, and that includes D'Angelo Russell. No one is absolving him of that, though he certainly didn't crater the game either. The point was that Luka Garza, Matt Ryan, and yes, Russell, were part of a lineup in the fourth quarter that removed the game from "garbage time" status by climbing back into the contest with hot shooting and scrambling defense. A two or three possession game with over a minute left is not garbage time. That is a fact.
Simply dismissing the second half, as you have, is weird fan behavior. Calling the game "decided" with, as you noted, 10-plus minutes remaining is weird fan behavior. The Timberwolves had opportunities late to steal this one despite the lack of effort early. None of this is disputable, but for whatever reason we can't just acknowledge it. LOL
Did I do that right? Or can we have discourse without the childish add-ons?