Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
This African American official sure has it in for the Wolves.
- Camden [enjin:6601484]
- Posts: 18065
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
Why is Ant trying to play so fast here? Settle down. Work some offense. Work some clock. Terrible time for a turnover. We aren't the team that needs to score quickly!
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
KiwiMatt wrote:This African American official sure has it in for the Wolves.
Let's face it. It don't matter the color. They ALL have it in for the Wolves!
- Crazysauce
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
What are we doing?
- Jester1534
- Posts: 3766
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
Camden wrote:Why is Ant trying to play so fast here? Settle down. Work some offense. Work some clock. Terrible time for a turnover. We aren't the team that needs to score quickly!
Cause he has low basketball IQ he's extremely gift physical and I will say he has tremendous instincts but game management situations he makes dumbass plays a lot.
- Camden [enjin:6601484]
- Posts: 18065
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
Camden wrote:Why is Ant trying to play so fast here? Settle down. Work some offense. Work some clock. Terrible time for a turnover. We aren't the team that needs to score quickly!
Made an unnecessary foul on one end and then coughed it up there. Not a good look after such a strong game thus far!
Gotta lock in mentally here....
- Jester1534
- Posts: 3766
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
Ball game Ant way to make up for the bonehead play earlier
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
Antman is good
Re: Battle of the Soft Schedules - Kings at Wolves GDT
34 10 and 6. Is that KG?