Minnesota Sports Forum

thedoper wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

thedoper wrote:

60WinTim wrote:On the bright side, did you guys see Antman shut down Lou Williams twice on the same possession?!? Very promising!

Yes. Why did he only get 10 minutes? Its stupid. We're not winning this game. Give Ant the ball.

I agree but as someone else said he needs to be in attack mode. Especially when they have to get up on him out of respect for his shot.

For sure. He needs to learn that on the floor.

Have to give Hernangomez minutes. He's making 7 mil a year can't have yet sit on the bench duh

Anthony Edwards in all honesty should be starting immediately

thedoper wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

thedoper wrote:

60WinTim wrote:On the bright side, did you guys see Antman shut down Lou Williams twice on the same possession?!? Very promising!

Yes. Why did he only get 10 minutes? Its stupid. We're not winning this game. Give Ant the ball.

I agree but as someone else said he needs to be in attack mode. Especially when they have to get up on him out of respect for his shot.

For sure. He needs to learn that on the floor.

I did. He had his defender on skates because he was 3-4 but never went to th basket. Get Zubac in foul trouble should be his goal.

Jim Pete said there no stabilizer without Kat. I believe Edwards as close as to a stabilizer we got already as a rookie. When they climbed back in the game it was on his back.

Back to hoping for lottery luck yet again. We are going to be way worse then I thought. This coaching staff dont have the balls to call anyone out. Hell i would bench dlo. You cant even call what hes doing out there defense. You play like that you sit his ass.

Rubio needs to be the primary ballhandler.

jester1534 wrote:

thedoper wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

thedoper wrote:

60WinTim wrote:On the bright side, did you guys see Antman shut down Lou Williams twice on the same possession?!? Very promising!

Yes. Why did he only get 10 minutes? Its stupid. We're not winning this game. Give Ant the ball.

I agree but as someone else said he needs to be in attack mode. Especially when they have to get up on him out of respect for his shot.

For sure. He needs to learn that on the floor.

I did. He had his defender on skates because he was 3-4 but never went to th basket. Get Zubac in foul trouble should be his goal.

Jim Pete said there no stabilizer without Kat. I believe Edwards as close as to a stabilizer we got already as a rookie. When they climbed back in the game it was on his back.

Nope. That definitely can't be true. *checks notes* Anthony Edwards is a -18 for the game.

The Clippers are shooting 56.5-percent from the floor and 53.3-percent from three as a team through one half of play. Maybe instead of, once again, pointing the finger at one player they all collectively do better, especially defensively.

Too small

Camden0916 wrote:

jester1534 wrote:

thedoper wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

thedoper wrote:

60WinTim wrote:On the bright side, did you guys see Antman shut down Lou Williams twice on the same possession?!? Very promising!

Yes. Why did he only get 10 minutes? Its stupid. We're not winning this game. Give Ant the ball.

I agree but as someone else said he needs to be in attack mode. Especially when they have to get up on him out of respect for his shot.

For sure. He needs to learn that on the floor.

I did. He had his defender on skates because he was 3-4 but never went to th basket. Get Zubac in foul trouble should be his goal.

Jim Pete said there no stabilizer without Kat. I believe Edwards as close as to a stabilizer we got already as a rookie. When they climbed back in the game it was on his back.

Nope. That definitely can't be true. *checks notes* Anthony Edwards is a -18 for the game.

It's like Lou Williams went 4-4 in that stretch against Jake Layman.

Anyone want to explain why that isn't a clear path?