GDT: We Need This One

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
Post Reply
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

GDT: We Need This One

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

Our guys play the Atlanta Hawks tonight at 7:30 PM in Atlanta. We've had some surprising performances on the road this year with wins over Charlotte and Chicago in their home arenas. We really need to win this one as we attempt to surge closer to the playoff hunt.

We're just two games behind Portland in the loss-column, which means we can pull closer in the standings tonight with a win. As Cool said in the other thread, we need to go 33-22 to finish the season at 41-41. I don't think that's an unreasonable conquest, but in order to do that we're going to need win games like this one.

Oh, and it'd be nice to have a win streak. We're the only team in the NBA to this point that hasn't won two games in a row. Hopefully, that ends tonight.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

Howard is a game time decision I think (?). I'm debating if the Hawks are better with or without him.....
User avatar
BloopOracle
Posts: 3353
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by BloopOracle »

ahh I see we are matching up against next years Wolves free agent signing Paul Milsap
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

Q12543 wrote:Howard is a game time decision I think (?). I'm debating if the Hawks are better with or without him.....


Yeah, as of two hours ago, he said his back was feeling better, but he wouldn't know if he'll be able to play until after warmups.

If Howard is out, I'd expect Atlanta to trot out the same starting lineup they used on Monday against Oklahoma City -- Schroeder, Korver, Bazemore, Sefalosha, and Millsap. They won't scare you with size, but that's a lot of shooting to defend. Offensively, this is another game where the gameplan should be to feed Towns down low early and often. Defensively, we have got to be sound with our rotations or we'll get thrashed from behind the three-point line. I also don't see Dieng playing more than 25 minutes tonight. This is a really bad matchup for him.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

Q12543 wrote:Howard is a game time decision I think (?). I'm debating if the Hawks are better with or without him.....



14 ppg / 13 reb / 1.5 blk / 63% fg / 22.3 PER

But some of the advanced stats are positive, too. 2.2 DBPM.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Howard is a game time decision I think (?). I'm debating if the Hawks are better with or without him.....



14 ppg / 13 reb / 1.5 blk / 63% fg / 22.3 PER

But some of the advanced stats are positive, too. 2.2 DBPM.


Yeah, he's put up some pretty sexy stats, but the team is worse last year defensively and are on pace to be worse record-wise. The biggest change I can think of is swapping out Horford for Howard.

Oh, and Houston is better this year than they were last year with their major roster change being....getting rid of Dwight Howard.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by kekgeek »

Q12543 wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Howard is a game time decision I think (?). I'm debating if the Hawks are better with or without him.....



14 ppg / 13 reb / 1.5 blk / 63% fg / 22.3 PER

But some of the advanced stats are positive, too. 2.2 DBPM.


Yeah, he's put up some pretty sexy stats, but the team is worse last year defensively and are on pace to be worse record-wise. The biggest change I can think of is swapping out Horford for Howard.


They don't have Teague anymore either
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

But Schroeder is pretty good isn't he? I never considered Teague anything other than a solid starting PG. Isn't DS pretty much the same?
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by kekgeek »

Q12543 wrote:But Schroeder is pretty good isn't he? I never considered Teague anything other than a solid starting PG. Isn't DS pretty much the same?


I agree but that means instead of an above average backup pg they don't have that anymore
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: GDT: We Need This One

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

kekgeek1 wrote:
Q12543 wrote:But Schroeder is pretty good isn't he? I never considered Teague anything other than a solid starting PG. Isn't DS pretty much the same?


I agree but that means instead of an above average backup pg they don't have that anymore


Good point. Let's hope Dunn has some success tonight. I'd love to see him push for a longer rope and build more trust with the coaching staff. Perhaps then we can finally see some Dunn-Tyus pairings and give LaVine a little more of a break (although I do love LaVine playing with that second unit).
Post Reply