Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16260
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by Lipoli390 »

Obviously, it's too early to render any final verdict on the tenure of Gersson Rosas as the Wolves PBO. But with the February trade deadline just behind us, I thought now is a good time for us to offer some reasonably well-informed interim thoughts on his tenure so far. He's had two opportunities to shape this team. His first opportunity was last summer when he had to form a new coaching staff and handle the draft, free agency and trade opportunities. The second opportunity was mid-season up to the February trade deadline. Here's my take so far.

1. Last Summer

Coaching Staff: I wasn't thrilled with Gersson's decision to hire Ryan Saunders as head coach. A number of us thought he would be in over his head and after watching him for more than half a season, I'd say that's been the case. But I also understand Rosas was under a lot of pressure to hire Ryan. Some of that pressure might have come from the owner, but I suspect most of the pressure came from fans and from Towns. It's accepted practice in the NBA today for front office executives to bend to the will of their cornerstone players. Given how vocal KAT apparently was about hiring Ryan, I have a hard time faulting Gersson for hiring him. Moreover, Ryan should get a lot of credit for assembling a high quality coaching staff around Ryan, especially Vanterpool and Pablo. Those two strike me as smart, charismatic and highly respected young coaches. By naming Ryan head coach at the outset and not giving him a particularly big contract, Rosas set himself up well to replace Ryan in the event things didn't go well. Given how the season has gone, I doubt KAT or the fan base would be as vocal for keeping Ryan as they were for hiring him in the first place. Overall Grade: B

Draft: This is where I think Gersson messed up. It was pretty clear that he traded up for Garland. When the Cavs surprised him by taking Garland, Gersson apparently declined offers to trade back down in the draft fo for additional assets and took Culver instead. Jarrett Culver has some talent and appears to be great guy with a terrific attitude and work ethic. But his shot was broken when we drafted him and it remains broken now more than half into this season. Given Gersson's vision of this team relying heavily on threes in a space and pace offense, drafting Culver made little sense. I think it was poor judgment to give up an asset to trade up in the draft for a player, Darius Garland, without knowing he would be available. And I think Gersson showed poor judgment again when he refused to trade back down and took Culver. Having said all that, the jury's still out on Culver. He has the makings of a terrific defender. He seems to have a high basketball IQ. He's crafty with the ball and also quicker and more athletic than I thought. Maybe he can fix his shot. If so, he could be very good. I think the Nowell pick in the 2nd round was excellent. He came to the Wolves as a 50% FG shooter and 40% 3-point shooter in college. He's a terrific athlete and very good ballhandler. He's be an elite performer to date in the G-League. Overall Grade: C

Free Agency and Trades: I give Gersson high marks here. He signed a group of promising young talent in Martin, McLaughlin, Naz, Vonleh, Bell and Layman. He ended up keeping the four who looked most promising this season and used the other two as trade assets last week. And importantly, he didn't make any bad deals last summer even as he pursued DLO. Overall Grade: B+

2. Mid-Season Trade Period

There is room to disagree on the quality of the transactions Gersson executed last week. I won't discuss them at length since I've done that in other threads. But I'll just say here that I'm impressed. I don't know if KAT and DLO can be the core duo around which this team can contend for a championship. But they are both immensely talented offensive players. Importantly, both of them do more than just score. Towns is a great rebounder and DLO is an excellent playmaker. DLO fills a position of need and provides ballhandling and playmaking, as well as 3-point shooting that this team desperately needed. He's a borderline all-star and is only 23 years old. Beasley is a very good three-point shooter who can do some other things as well. He's hungry and still only 24 years old. H-Gomez and the Kentucky guy have some talent as well. Gersson executed some bold moves that definitely improve the team and that have terrific long term potential. He set out to build around KAT with other young talent and that's what he's done. More than anything, he's given this downtrodden organization and fan base some hope and excitement. Overall Grade: A-
User avatar
TAFKASP
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by TAFKASP »

Image
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by Duke13 »

I get the frustration with Culver, but despite his broken shot, he fits well into the modern game, can handle the ball, initiate/create offense, and guard multiple positions. Plenty of guys have improved their shots in the NBA. Saric was a terrible fit, and has minimal value around the league. Great trade and well worth the gamble to move up.

They clearly don't think having another 7 footer next to Kat is the way to go, I don't either, unless his name is Giannis. Oh you forgot the signing of Naz, and the find of a productive player such as Jmac, while letting a Tyus go on to get overpaid.
User avatar
rapsuperstar31
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by rapsuperstar31 »

I had completely checked out on this season for the first time in the 20 years I've been watching the Wolves. These moves got me right back in. I find it exciting that he can construct these type of moves, and will take chances. Really liked what I saw yesterday and am excited to see how DLo fits in, and where we go next.
User avatar
D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by D-Mac [enjin:19736340] »

Duke13 wrote:I get the frustration with Culver, but despite his broken shot, he fits well into the modern game, can handle the ball, initiate/create offense, and guard multiple positions. Plenty of guys have improved their shots in the NBA. Saric was a terrible fit, and has minimal value around the league. Great trade and well worth the gamble to move up.

They clearly don't think having another 7 footer next to Kat is the way to go, I don't either, unless his name is Giannis. Oh you forgot the signing of Naz, and the find of a productive player such as Jmac, while letting a Tyus go on to get overpaid.


I agree, he should get credit for not paying tyus. Also, Saric was nothing special and I was surprised we were able to move up with him. Culver hasn't been great, but that was still a good trade.

I said he needed to trade Covington to get value and he did that. I also said before yesterday's game, that I much preferred Beasley to Houston's late first, I think he did very well at the deadline.

I like dilo and he seems like an intelligent kid, but who gave him the mic before the game? That was kinda strange.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16260
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by Lipoli390 »

Duke13 wrote:I get the frustration with Culver, but despite his broken shot, he fits well into the modern game, can handle the ball, initiate/create offense, and guard multiple positions. Plenty of guys have improved their shots in the NBA. Saric was a terrible fit, and has minimal value around the league. Great trade and well worth the gamble to move up.

They clearly don't think having another 7 footer next to Kat is the way to go, I don't either, unless his name is Giannis. Oh you forgot the signing of Naz, and the find of a productive player such as Jmac, while letting a Tyus go on to get overpaid.


I had no problem trading Saric. I never saw him as a good long-term fit here. It's the opportunity cost - i.e., what other players or draft assets the Wolves could have received in return for Saric. It's also what the Wolves could have gotten if they had traded down.
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by thedoper »

I cant give Rosas a high grade for his offseason moves last summer since his plan (as I see it) was to tank this team and make the case apparent for a complete overhaul. Every one of his signings this year have ultimately done very little this year, the young G league practice squad guys do all show potential which is great, but I cant go over a C+ with the record for the season being where it is at.

I like the trade, with you on that.

Culver has been awful, I'd grade it a D just based on his play and stats to date. I do see talent there, but how can he utilize that talent with that shot? His skillset could make him a unique downhill player, but if you can hit free throws we're giving away points. It doesnt look good so far.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Lip, I like your comments on what he did last summer. But it's simply impossible to render any type of judgement on what happened last week. Let's do that a year from now.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:Lip, I like your comments on what he did last summer. But it's simply impossible to render any type of judgement on what happened last week. Let's do that a year from now.


But... Didn't you... The end is near... The sky is falling... The Wolves are doomed for the next eight years...

Never mind. Carry on.
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Evaluating Gersson Rosas

Post by thedoper »

Camden0916 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:Lip, I like your comments on what he did last summer. But it's simply impossible to render any type of judgement on what happened last week. Let's do that a year from now.


But... Didn't you... The end is near... The sky is falling... The Wolves are doomed for the next eight years...

Never mind. Carry on.


I think its a pretty fair play for a Minnesota sports fan to exercise caution.

That being said we're probably going to have a winning streak that makes us miss out on an impact player in the draft.
Post Reply