KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
BloopOracle
Posts: 3353
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by BloopOracle »

REALLY hope it's us and not the Suns or another team when they inevitably push to team up soon.
User avatar
WildWolf2813
Posts: 3467
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by WildWolf2813 »

Good for Towns. The next time he should ever be an all-star again is when he has this team in the playoff mix.
User avatar
KG4Ever
Posts: 2958
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by KG4Ever »

Why on earth would anyone think Russell would be named to the all star team this year when he is among the worst in the league in net rating and his team is dead last in the West? He was very lucky Adam Silver named him as a replacement last year (which I take as more of a gesture to the Nets organization after what they endured) as he parlayed it into a max contract.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by kekgeek »

KG4Ever wrote:Why on earth would anyone think Russell would be named to the all star team this year when he is among the worst in the league in net rating and his team is dead last in the West? He was very lucky Adam Silver named him as a replacement last year (which I take as more of a gesture to the Nets organization after what they endured) as he parlayed it into a max contract.


His Net rating is bad no doubt but he is in the 57th percentile in on/off numbers. His team is really bad. He is still really bad when it comes to defensive #s though.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

None of those guys should have been close
User avatar
KG4Ever
Posts: 2958
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by KG4Ever »

Russell's plus minus numbers per game are 8th worst in the NBA for players with at least 30 games. https://stats.nba.com/players/traditional/?sort=PLUS_MINUS&dir=1
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by kekgeek »

KG4Ever wrote:Russell's plus minus numbers per game are 8th worst in the NBA for players with at least 30 games. https://stats.nba.com/players/traditional/?sort=PLUS_MINUS&dir=1


Oh ya it is really bad no doubt. Just saying rest of his team is really bad. The Warriors have been better on the court when he is playing then not. Now does that mean much probably not because they are bad if he is playing or not. Just saying he is probably playing with the worst roster in the NBA. But ya he is not close to being an all star this year.
User avatar
KG4Ever
Posts: 2958
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by KG4Ever »

KAT had the numbers but
kekgeek1 wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:Russell's plus minus numbers per game are 8th worst in the NBA for players with at least 30 games. https://stats.nba.com/players/traditional/?sort=PLUS_MINUS&dir=1


Oh ya it is really bad no doubt. Just saying rest of his team is really bad. The Warriors have been better on the court when he is playing then not. Now does that mean much probably not because they are bad if he is playing or not. Just saying he is probably playing with the worst roster in the NBA. But ya he is not close to being an all star this year.


Nice try, but I checked Basketball Reference and Russell's on off numbers are negative. Sure the offensive numbers go up when he's on the court by 3.7 but he gives up 5.4 more points. https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/GSW/2020/on-off/
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14527
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by kekgeek »

KG4Ever wrote:KAT had the numbers but
kekgeek1 wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:Russell's plus minus numbers per game are 8th worst in the NBA for players with at least 30 games. https://stats.nba.com/players/traditional/?sort=PLUS_MINUS&dir=1


Oh ya it is really bad no doubt. Just saying rest of his team is really bad. The Warriors have been better on the court when he is playing then not. Now does that mean much probably not because they are bad if he is playing or not. Just saying he is probably playing with the worst roster in the NBA. But ya he is not close to being an all star this year.


Nice try, but I checked Basketball Reference and Russell's on off numbers are negative. Sure the offensive numbers go up when he's on the court by 3.7 but he gives up 5.4 more points. https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/GSW/2020/on-off/


I use cleaning the glass, it eliminates garbage time (what there is a lot of in GS right now).

https://cleaningtheglass.com/stats/player/3211/onoff#tab-team_efficiency
User avatar
KG4Ever
Posts: 2958
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 12:00 am

Re: KAT, Russell, and Booker are not selected as All Stars

Post by KG4Ever »

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/devin-booker-karl-anthony-towns-bradley-beal-headline-nba-all-star-snubs-041514084.html

Booker and KAT mentioned. Crickets for DLO.
Post Reply