Sam Mitchell's plan and development (Warning- +/- stats involved)
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:03 am
Sam Mitchell is almost universally panned in this forum, and being a long-time fan of his, I want to provide a little balance for discussion purposes. Some of this is stolen from one of Q's posts today, but this expands a little on his thoughts in a more pro-Sam manner.
Sometimes we tend to discuss the Wolves too granularly, looking at individual results rather than team results. But ultimately basketball is a team game, and the coach is obligated to put the players together on the court that best executes his vision, and I argue that Sam is doing this.
Plus/minus stats are not the cleanest stat, especially in the short term, because so many factors impact them. But you still win basketball games by outscoring your opponent, so ultimately I think +/- is the most important stat. Through a very small sample size of 4 games, here are the Wolves' +/- stats per 36 (I'm excluding Miller, Payne and Rudez because of minimal minutes):
Prince: 12.6
KG 12.6
Rubio 5.7
Wiggins -.9
KAT -1.6
Bjelica -1.7
Dieng -1.8
Shabazz -2.4
Martin -8.7
LaVine -9.7
There you have it... and that's why Sam continues to start KG and Prince, despite the objections of this board and every other one I follow. Some may try to argue that their +/- is inflated because they get to play exclusively with Rubio, and there is some substance to that. But offsetting that is the fact that almost all of their minutes have been against the other team's starters (since they get most of their minutes at the start of halves)...despite this, they are significantly outscoring their opponent. How does this tie into Sam's vision, what is working, and what is not?
1) Sam has said this season is all about development, and he is showing this by teaming his future stars (Wig, KAT and Rubio), with players they can effectively learn from. Sam has clearly told Wig and KAT that they need to be aggressive and score, and KG and Prince have been more than willing to be just facilitators on offense. Further, Sam knows that nothing can be better for defensive development of his Future Three than to be on the court with defensive experts like KG and Prince. Sam's plan is working to perfection with respect to the starting 5: Our future Big Three is getting the maximum opportunity to develop, and our starters are outscoring their starters.
2) What is not working? As we all know (and as made perfectly clear by the +/- numbers), Zach has not been the answer at PG....his +/- per 36 is the worst on the team. But while Zach is not the answer short-term at PG if we want to win now, I think continuing to play him there is consistent with Sam's vision. As Flip said many times, getting minutes at PG can only make Zach a better player at either SG or PG. Moving Miller into the backup PG role and moving Zach to the bench would probably be the best "win-now" lineup, but I think it would be inconsistent with Sam's development strategy.
The Wolves are now 2-2 after two disappointing home losses. Still, my preference is for the Wolves to stay the course. Changing the starting lineup in light of the +/- numbers they are putting up would be foolish, and since Bazz needs his minutes, that locks Wig into continuing to play SG. That leaves us with two options for Zach...continue to play backup PG and hope for development there, or move Miller or Jones to backup PG and let Zach and Martin compete for backup minutes at SG. I prefer the current path, but would not be opposed to option 2 if Sam became convinced that playing Zach at PG was hurting his development. But I think Martin's ability to score in bunches might push Zach out of the regular rotation, and I don't think that is the best development move for this team.
There has been a lot of requests for Bazz to move into the starting lineup. I love Bazz, but I think his best role is as a scorer off the bench. And I'm baffled why anyone would want to take Prince out of the starting lineup based on the early numbers. Sam needs to stay with this starting five, and tinker with the backup roles if he sees the need.
Sometimes we tend to discuss the Wolves too granularly, looking at individual results rather than team results. But ultimately basketball is a team game, and the coach is obligated to put the players together on the court that best executes his vision, and I argue that Sam is doing this.
Plus/minus stats are not the cleanest stat, especially in the short term, because so many factors impact them. But you still win basketball games by outscoring your opponent, so ultimately I think +/- is the most important stat. Through a very small sample size of 4 games, here are the Wolves' +/- stats per 36 (I'm excluding Miller, Payne and Rudez because of minimal minutes):
Prince: 12.6
KG 12.6
Rubio 5.7
Wiggins -.9
KAT -1.6
Bjelica -1.7
Dieng -1.8
Shabazz -2.4
Martin -8.7
LaVine -9.7
There you have it... and that's why Sam continues to start KG and Prince, despite the objections of this board and every other one I follow. Some may try to argue that their +/- is inflated because they get to play exclusively with Rubio, and there is some substance to that. But offsetting that is the fact that almost all of their minutes have been against the other team's starters (since they get most of their minutes at the start of halves)...despite this, they are significantly outscoring their opponent. How does this tie into Sam's vision, what is working, and what is not?
1) Sam has said this season is all about development, and he is showing this by teaming his future stars (Wig, KAT and Rubio), with players they can effectively learn from. Sam has clearly told Wig and KAT that they need to be aggressive and score, and KG and Prince have been more than willing to be just facilitators on offense. Further, Sam knows that nothing can be better for defensive development of his Future Three than to be on the court with defensive experts like KG and Prince. Sam's plan is working to perfection with respect to the starting 5: Our future Big Three is getting the maximum opportunity to develop, and our starters are outscoring their starters.
2) What is not working? As we all know (and as made perfectly clear by the +/- numbers), Zach has not been the answer at PG....his +/- per 36 is the worst on the team. But while Zach is not the answer short-term at PG if we want to win now, I think continuing to play him there is consistent with Sam's vision. As Flip said many times, getting minutes at PG can only make Zach a better player at either SG or PG. Moving Miller into the backup PG role and moving Zach to the bench would probably be the best "win-now" lineup, but I think it would be inconsistent with Sam's development strategy.
The Wolves are now 2-2 after two disappointing home losses. Still, my preference is for the Wolves to stay the course. Changing the starting lineup in light of the +/- numbers they are putting up would be foolish, and since Bazz needs his minutes, that locks Wig into continuing to play SG. That leaves us with two options for Zach...continue to play backup PG and hope for development there, or move Miller or Jones to backup PG and let Zach and Martin compete for backup minutes at SG. I prefer the current path, but would not be opposed to option 2 if Sam became convinced that playing Zach at PG was hurting his development. But I think Martin's ability to score in bunches might push Zach out of the regular rotation, and I don't think that is the best development move for this team.
There has been a lot of requests for Bazz to move into the starting lineup. I love Bazz, but I think his best role is as a scorer off the bench. And I'm baffled why anyone would want to take Prince out of the starting lineup based on the early numbers. Sam needs to stay with this starting five, and tinker with the backup roles if he sees the need.