We won't get Wiggins in the end

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
BloopOracle
Posts: 3221
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by BloopOracle »

something bad will happen to us as usual

just prepping don't mind me
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

Is this the fire and pitchfork thread for Flip if he doesn't get the job done? I could get on board with that.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

khans2k5 wrote:Is this the fire and pitchfork thread for Flip if he doesn't get the job done? I could get on board with that.


Only if he chooses Thompson over Wiggins.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

http://m.espn.go.com/nba/story?storyId=11240046&src=desktop&rand=ref~%7B%22ref%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FkLVXOqQB8a%22%7D

Looks like Cleveland is going to sign Wiggins this week. Don't know if that is a good or bad thing, but Flip will really come off looking bad in my opinion if it is determined that he kept Love with Wiggins on the table. If he keeps Love and Love leaves for nothing, that is a fire-able offense in my opinion even though I know he wouldn't be fired.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

khans2k5 wrote:http://m.espn.go.com/nba/story?storyId=11240046&src=desktop&rand=ref~%7B%22ref%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FkLVXOqQB8a%22%7D

Looks like Cleveland is going to sign Wiggins this week. Don't know if that is a good or bad thing, but Flip will really come off looking bad in my opinion if it is determined that he kept Love with Wiggins on the table. If he keeps Love and Love leaves for nothing, that is a fire-able offense in my opinion even though I know he wouldn't be fired.


Makes it easier to match contracts if Wiggins is signed.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

That's the reason why I can't tell if this is good or bad. If they wanted more than just Love or wanted to give back less, this helps in those goals.
User avatar
TAFKASP
Posts: 5310
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by TAFKASP »

Camden wrote:Makes it easier to match contracts if Wiggins is signed.


This 100%!
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

MIN: Wiggins, Bennett, Thompson or Waiters, Haywood + future 1st = $18M-ish

CLE: Love, Brewer = $20.4M-ish

Makes sense from everything I've heard. I love Brewer, but I'm certainly good with dealing him.
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1842
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by TheGrey08 »

Camden wrote:MIN: Wiggins, Bennett, Thompson or Waiters, Haywood + future 1st = $18M-ish

CLE: Love, Brewer = $20.4M-ish

Makes sense from everything I've heard. I love Brewer, but I'm certainly good with dealing him.

Well hopefully they announce a trade when he's signed even if they have to wait 30 days to officially do it. BTW, you can remove Haywood from that deal and it still works. I doubt they'd want to include him unless they had to. That deal with work for me, but I'm really torn on who I would want to unload in terms of Brewer/Bud/Martin b/c I'm looking at how they would fit with the young prospects.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: We won't get Wiggins in the end

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

TheGrey08 wrote:
Camden wrote:MIN: Wiggins, Bennett, Thompson or Waiters, Haywood + future 1st = $18M-ish

CLE: Love, Brewer = $20.4M-ish

Makes sense from everything I've heard. I love Brewer, but I'm certainly good with dealing him.

Well hopefully they announce a trade when he's signed even if they have to wait 30 days to officially do it. BTW, you can remove Haywood from that deal and it still works. I doubt they'd want to include him unless they had to. That deal with work for me, but I'm really torn on who I would want to unload in terms of Brewer/Bud/Martin b/c I'm looking at how they would fit with the young prospects.


The more I think about it, the more I believe Brewer makes sense for both teams. Minnesota needs to keep as many shooters as possible since Love is being sent out, and Wiggins could slide into Brewer's role as soon as his rookie year. For Cleveland, Brewer could be an energy guy off the bench or even start for them. His offensive/defensive stats say he's better suited as a SG, and a Brewer/Miller wing combo off the bench would be nice for them if that's the route they took.
Post Reply