Page 1 of 4
Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:44 pm
by kekgeek
The Minnesota Timberwolves will reportedly show interest in signing Bradley Beal once his contract buyout is finalized
(via: @JakeLFischer)
Would love this.
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:52 pm
by Winorlose
That would be a huge get for Minnesota. Beal still has a lot left in the tank, and paired with Edwards and Towns, that’s a legit offensive trio. The big question is whether the Wolves can offer him a clear role and playoff upside — he’s not looking to rebuild again. If they can make the cap work post-buyout, I’m all for it. Would also bring some veteran poise in tight games.
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:56 pm
by AussieWolf3
Interesting. I won't lie, it crossed my mind as a good idea if he's bought out, but I also know a vanishingly small amount about Beal's game.
What would he offer the Wolves, and at what price is that worth it?
My understanding is that he's not much of a PG, nor a good defender (disappointing, considering his measurables), but he would be another ball handler and 2nd side scorer.
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:56 pm
by AussieWolf3
Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:52 pm
That would be a huge get for Minnesota. Beal still has a lot left in the tank, and paired with Edwards and Towns, that’s a legit offensive trio. The big question is whether the Wolves can offer him a clear role and playoff upside — he’s not looking to rebuild again. If they can make the cap work post-buyout, I’m all for it. Would also bring some veteran poise in tight games.
Towns?
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:01 pm
by Winorlose
AussieWolf3 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:56 pm
Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:52 pm
That would be a huge get for Minnesota. Beal still has a lot left in the tank, and paired with Edwards and Towns, that’s a legit offensive trio. The big question is whether the Wolves can offer him a clear role and playoff upside — he’s not looking to rebuild again. If they can make the cap work post-buyout, I’m all for it. Would also bring some veteran poise in tight games.
Towns?
lol, The heat is affecting me badly today
Right, fair point — Towns isn’t even on the roster anymore since the Knicks trade. That actually makes the idea of adding Beal even more intriguing. With Ant as the clear #1 and Gobert anchoring the defense, Beal could slide in as a secondary scorer and veteran closer. The spacing might even improve without KAT clogging things inside. If they can make the finances work post-buyout, this could be one of the smarter late-offseason moves. By the way, I’ve been using the
linebet app to keep up with all these trade rumors and odds — super handy for checking lines on the go.
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:08 pm
by AussieWolf3
Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:01 pm
AussieWolf3 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:56 pm
Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:52 pm
That would be a huge get for Minnesota. Beal still has a lot left in the tank, and paired with Edwards and Towns, that’s a legit offensive trio. The big question is whether the Wolves can offer him a clear role and playoff upside — he’s not looking to rebuild again. If they can make the cap work post-buyout, I’m all for it. Would also bring some veteran poise in tight games.
Towns?
lol, The heat is affecting me badly today
Right, fair point — Towns isn’t even on the roster anymore since the Knicks trade. That actually makes the idea of adding Beal even more intriguing. With Ant as the clear #1 and Gobert anchoring the defense, Beal could slide in as a secondary scorer and veteran closer. The spacing might even improve without KAT clogging things inside. If they can make the finances work post-buyout, this could be one of the smarter late-offseason moves.
As I said above, I don't know Beal's game all that much, however consensus opinion is not all that kind to him. I suspect that has more to do with his contract than his actual game, but either way, who is in place of? Is he off the bench, or is he in place of Randle?
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:12 pm
by Winorlose
AussieWolf3 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:08 pm
Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:01 pm
lol, The heat is affecting me badly today
Right, fair point — Towns isn’t even on the roster anymore since the Knicks trade. That actually makes the idea of adding Beal even more intriguing. With Ant as the clear #1 and Gobert anchoring the defense, Beal could slide in as a secondary scorer and veteran closer. The spacing might even improve without KAT clogging things inside. If they can make the finances work post-buyout, this could be one of the smarter late-offseason moves.
As I said above, I don't know Beal's game all that much, however consensus opinion is not all that kind to him. I suspect that has more to do with his contract than his actual game, but either way, who is in place of? Is he off the bench, or is he in place of Randle?
Yeah, totally fair — a lot of the criticism around Beal has been contract-driven more than skill-related. In a buyout situation where he’s no longer tied to that max deal, expectations shift. I wouldn’t see him replacing Randle though — different roles entirely. Beal would likely start at SG or come off the bench as a sixth man depending on fit. If anything, he gives them flexibility in late-game lineups and scoring depth, especially if injuries hit mid-season. It’s less about who he replaces, more about what he adds.
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:15 pm
by Coolbreeze44
I'm a fan, but another ball handler is my preference.
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:55 pm
by Monster
Without having watched Beal much the last couple years here is the what I can tell you.
He is a pretty efficient player and he has some pretty good assist numbers over the years. I don't view him as a bad guy that would create problems on a roster. The other issue is he has problems staying healthy. I'd guess he is still a starting level player or at worst a really good six man. Whatever team is getting him would be getting a pretty nice player for the money. If the Wolves didn't call and make a case for themselves what are they even doing with their lives? I'm not getting my hopes up.
Re: Bradley Beal
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2025 3:12 pm
by 60WinTim
So, does than mean Beal would start at PG for the Wolves?
Beal has missed an awful lot of games the past 5 or 6 years. Other than TC going big game hunting, I don't see a great fit for Beal in Minnesota. And I am not sure Beal would feel a great attraction for Minnesota.
I really don't see much momentum here.