Camden wrote:Q-was-here wrote:Camden wrote:Q-was-here wrote:Camden wrote:Darren Wolfson:
"Minnesota's definitely trying to trade for Marcus Smart, but unless they include a first-round pick or Jaden McDaniels in addition to Malik Beasley, it most likely doesn't get done."
It sounds like the Wolves have the right idea -- targeting a playmaking guard with defensive chops -- but they're chasing the wrong guy, in my opinion. I would
not give up a first-round pick or Jaden McDaniels in a trade for Marcus Smart and his bloated contract.
He'd give us two guys in the top 10 in defensive EPM, the other being Jarred Vanderbilt.
My issue, besides his contract, is his iffy shooting. But still....the plus-minus gods have smiled upon him his entire career.
He must be doing something right!
Yeah, playing next to Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown, among other really solid players throughout his career! Kudos to Marcus Smart. Very savvy!
In all seriousness, Smart's an OK player. He's just not worth what he's set to be paid or the price to acquire him, especially when there are significantly better options available. That's my take on it.
That's funny because, just like DLO, he has the best Net Rating among the Celtic starters. So may be Tatum and Brown are the ones benefiting from playing next to Smart! Or are you also suggesting that DLO's team high net rating is just random noise and inflated because he plays next to KAT and Ant?
Well, that would also mean that Marcus Smart is the superior player to Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown, and the only person on Earth that might actually believe that nonsense is Smart's mother. Oof!
My stance on plus-minus and net rating metrics hasn't changed or wavered. They're noisy stats. They rarely tell the whole story. They certainly lack context. Stop me if you've read this before! When used in combination with everything else at our disposal they can be
helpful, but on their own they aren't very meaningful.
Also, my view of D-Lo has been positive here regardless of his plus-minus numbers or net rating -- whether they were negative in the past or positive this year. He's a good point guard.
I haven't flip-flopped like others have due to a flawed statistic.
Hypothetically speaking, if D-Lo had one of the worst net ratings on the team but everything else remained the same, including the team's record with him, why would that change your view of him? You can see the impact he has on the game. You can see the importance of having a lead guard that can score and facilitate. If one stat says differently, maybe the focus should be on why you would value that stat in the first place!
Cam, I'm sure you didn't mean to suggest that anyone here has flip-flopped on DLo's value merely based on his gigantic improvement in on/off or +/-...a statistic in which he has underperformed his entire career. You know there isn't one poster here who would be only use that measure to conclude that DLo is playing much better this year (although it is a strong indicator that he is). Those who have noted that DLo is not even close to the same player he has been the rest of his career have also pointed out several other measures which support this take.
1) DLo and Wiggins are the only two max player in the association with a double digit negative net rating on BasketballReference prior to this year. This year he is still negative, but he is much improved with an ORtg of 111 and a DRtg of 113, a 7 point improvement over last year and 8 points better than his average year coming into this season.
2) Even more dramatic is his positive net rating of 7.5 on nba.com. Prior to this year, he had a negative net rating every year of his career except for his "all-star" year when he was positive by .2. Nobody could honestly argue that is not a significant improvement.
3) While the eye test is not statistical, almost everyone here agree that his defense looks remarkably different this year. his numbers on nba.com surpass even the eye test. He has a defensive rating of 104.9 this year, an extraordinary improvement over his career number of 113.
4) He's protecting the ball and distributing much better than any year of his career. His A:TO ratio of 2.56 is the best of his career.
5) While he started the year slowly shooting and was honest about his issues with the new ball, his vastly improved shot selection has him at a 54 TS%, 10 percentage points better than his career average.
So other than PPG, which are 1 point lower than last year but still better than his career scoring average. By any valid measure, DLo is performing at a level far beyond anything he has done in his career. Prior to this year, he was a talented player who didn't seem to be meeting his potential, didn't measure much better than average in the types of advanced statistics smart NBA fans use to measure value, and certainly wasn't making his teams better (as measured by his poor on/off numbers and wins and losses. Most of us are thrilled to see this kid turn his career around this season and become a positive contributor.
So I have provided a number of measures that show DLo is performing at a different level than he ever has before. I respect your admiration for DLo...we all have players we gravitate to, and you've been a passionate supporter of his even when the vast majority of posters here were critical of his defense and offensive consistency. But I'm curious what statistical measure you use to demonstrate that he has always played at a high level, because I'm just not seeing it.