Would you do Beasley for Collins

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
Post Reply
User avatar
FNG
Posts: 5698
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by FNG »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:





Wig and DLO have proven to be exactly who we thought they were pre-trade...talented players, neither of whom deserve a max salary. .



The Wolves are 26 - 74 over the past two seasons.

Would the team have been any worse with Batum's corpse + contract?

It's now expiring by the way... and the Wolves STILL don't have a clue whether Russell and Towns will work together... and they're out either a lottery pick in 2021 or a potentially high draft pick in 2022...


Any worse? I would argue we might even be better this year with Batum's 29 MPG rather than Wig or DLO. In fact, we might have even improved enough to put ourselves out of the Cunningham sweepstakes.

Batum might have been a corpse last season, but somehow he has found the fountain of youth this season. He's arguably the Clippers 4th most effective player behind their 2 stars and Beverly. An eFG% of 62%, 44% on threes, and defense that. while not vintage Batum, still is far better than anything Wig or DLO bring.

Oh to go back in time and trade Wig straight up for Batum...



Yes. We've discussed Batum's resurgence previously. But I think there's some fool's gold there.

He's playing with very talented teammates who know how to play basketball... something he wouldn't have in abundance in Minnesota. I also don't think it's coincidence that he's playing better when his next million-dollar contract is on the line...

But yes... while that proposed trade had little or no short-term value... at least the Wolves could have moved on much faster. As it is... they've mortgaged the future to spin their wheels even more. Neither option was great. But ripping off band-aids never is much fun.


Yep, likely some fool's gold there for the 2 reasons you mention. I don't know for sure, however, but I think with the load management the Clips are doing this year with their 2 stars, Batum is more often than not on the court with neither of them or, at most, one of them. And his defense has been quite good, and his scoring very efficient. But I suspect that you are correct and that his performance this year would be more like what he did in Atlanta than his Clipper resurgence...of course, thereby ensuring a bottom three finish and a 40% chance of a top three pick (and in any event, a certainty of a top 5 pick in this stacked, deep draft).

Do over, please...

But regardless, he's an expiring...and I'll take big cap space and a first round pick in this year's draft over either Wig or DLO. All day.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14522
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by kekgeek »

FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:





Wig and DLO have proven to be exactly who we thought they were pre-trade...talented players, neither of whom deserve a max salary. .



The Wolves are 26 - 74 over the past two seasons.

Would the team have been any worse with Batum's corpse + contract?

It's now expiring by the way... and the Wolves STILL don't have a clue whether Russell and Towns will work together... and they're out either a lottery pick in 2021 or a potentially high draft pick in 2022...


Any worse? I would argue we might even be better this year with Batum's 29 MPG rather than Wig or DLO. In fact, we might have even improved enough to put ourselves out of the Cunningham sweepstakes.

Batum might have been a corpse last season, but somehow he has found the fountain of youth this season. He's arguably the Clippers 4th most effective player behind their 2 stars and Beverly. An eFG% of 62%, 44% on threes, and defense that. while not vintage Batum, still is far better than anything Wig or DLO bring.

Oh to go back in time and trade Wig straight up for Batum...



Yes. We've discussed Batum's resurgence previously. But I think there's some fool's gold there.

He's playing with very talented teammates who know how to play basketball... something he wouldn't have in abundance in Minnesota. I also don't think it's coincidence that he's playing better when his next million-dollar contract is on the line...

But yes... while that proposed trade had little or no short-term value... at least the Wolves could have moved on much faster. As it is... they've mortgaged the future to spin their wheels even more. Neither option was great. But ripping off band-aids never is much fun.


Yep, likely some fool's gold there for the 2 reasons you mention. I don't know for sure, however, but I think with the load management the Clips are doing this year with their 2 stars, Batum is more often than not on the court with neither of them or, at most, one of them. And his defense has been quite good, and his scoring very efficient. But I suspect that you are correct and that his performance this year would be more like what he did in Atlanta than his Clipper resurgence...of course, thereby ensuring a bottom three finish and a 40% chance of a top three pick (and in any event, a certainty of a top 5 pick in this stacked, deep draft).

Do over, please...

But regardless, he's an expiring...and I'll take big cap space and a first round pick in this year's draft over either Wig or DLO. All day.


Are we sure the Hornets would of done that deal. Wiggins means no Hayward for them
User avatar
FNG
Posts: 5698
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by FNG »

kekgeek1 wrote:
FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:





Wig and DLO have proven to be exactly who we thought they were pre-trade...talented players, neither of whom deserve a max salary. .



The Wolves are 26 - 74 over the past two seasons.

Would the team have been any worse with Batum's corpse + contract?

It's now expiring by the way... and the Wolves STILL don't have a clue whether Russell and Towns will work together... and they're out either a lottery pick in 2021 or a potentially high draft pick in 2022...


Any worse? I would argue we might even be better this year with Batum's 29 MPG rather than Wig or DLO. In fact, we might have even improved enough to put ourselves out of the Cunningham sweepstakes.

Batum might have been a corpse last season, but somehow he has found the fountain of youth this season. He's arguably the Clippers 4th most effective player behind their 2 stars and Beverly. An eFG% of 62%, 44% on threes, and defense that. while not vintage Batum, still is far better than anything Wig or DLO bring.

Oh to go back in time and trade Wig straight up for Batum...



Yes. We've discussed Batum's resurgence previously. But I think there's some fool's gold there.

He's playing with very talented teammates who know how to play basketball... something he wouldn't have in abundance in Minnesota. I also don't think it's coincidence that he's playing better when his next million-dollar contract is on the line...

But yes... while that proposed trade had little or no short-term value... at least the Wolves could have moved on much faster. As it is... they've mortgaged the future to spin their wheels even more. Neither option was great. But ripping off band-aids never is much fun.


Yep, likely some fool's gold there for the 2 reasons you mention. I don't know for sure, however, but I think with the load management the Clips are doing this year with their 2 stars, Batum is more often than not on the court with neither of them or, at most, one of them. And his defense has been quite good, and his scoring very efficient. But I suspect that you are correct and that his performance this year would be more like what he did in Atlanta than his Clipper resurgence...of course, thereby ensuring a bottom three finish and a 40% chance of a top three pick (and in any event, a certainty of a top 5 pick in this stacked, deep draft).

Do over, please...

But regardless, he's an expiring...and I'll take big cap space and a first round pick in this year's draft over either Wig or DLO. All day.


Are we sure the Hornets would of done that deal. Wiggins means no Hayward for them


Fair point...water under the bridge anyway, I guess
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

kekgeek1 wrote:
FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:





Wig and DLO have proven to be exactly who we thought they were pre-trade...talented players, neither of whom deserve a max salary. .



The Wolves are 26 - 74 over the past two seasons.

Would the team have been any worse with Batum's corpse + contract?

It's now expiring by the way... and the Wolves STILL don't have a clue whether Russell and Towns will work together... and they're out either a lottery pick in 2021 or a potentially high draft pick in 2022...


Any worse? I would argue we might even be better this year with Batum's 29 MPG rather than Wig or DLO. In fact, we might have even improved enough to put ourselves out of the Cunningham sweepstakes.

Batum might have been a corpse last season, but somehow he has found the fountain of youth this season. He's arguably the Clippers 4th most effective player behind their 2 stars and Beverly. An eFG% of 62%, 44% on threes, and defense that. while not vintage Batum, still is far better than anything Wig or DLO bring.

Oh to go back in time and trade Wig straight up for Batum...



Yes. We've discussed Batum's resurgence previously. But I think there's some fool's gold there.

He's playing with very talented teammates who know how to play basketball... something he wouldn't have in abundance in Minnesota. I also don't think it's coincidence that he's playing better when his next million-dollar contract is on the line...

But yes... while that proposed trade had little or no short-term value... at least the Wolves could have moved on much faster. As it is... they've mortgaged the future to spin their wheels even more. Neither option was great. But ripping off band-aids never is much fun.


Yep, likely some fool's gold there for the 2 reasons you mention. I don't know for sure, however, but I think with the load management the Clips are doing this year with their 2 stars, Batum is more often than not on the court with neither of them or, at most, one of them. And his defense has been quite good, and his scoring very efficient. But I suspect that you are correct and that his performance this year would be more like what he did in Atlanta than his Clipper resurgence...of course, thereby ensuring a bottom three finish and a 40% chance of a top three pick (and in any event, a certainty of a top 5 pick in this stacked, deep draft).

Do over, please...

But regardless, he's an expiring...and I'll take big cap space and a first round pick in this year's draft over either Wig or DLO. All day.


Are we sure the Hornets would of done that deal. Wiggins means no Hayward for them



We don't know if the Hornets dug Wiggins at all to do the deal... BUT... it wouldn't have been a Wiggins or Hayward deal.

This trade would have happened long before Hayward's time in Boston was nearing its end.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14522
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by kekgeek »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
FNG wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:
Camden wrote:
KG4Ever wrote:





Wig and DLO have proven to be exactly who we thought they were pre-trade...talented players, neither of whom deserve a max salary. .



The Wolves are 26 - 74 over the past two seasons.

Would the team have been any worse with Batum's corpse + contract?

It's now expiring by the way... and the Wolves STILL don't have a clue whether Russell and Towns will work together... and they're out either a lottery pick in 2021 or a potentially high draft pick in 2022...


Any worse? I would argue we might even be better this year with Batum's 29 MPG rather than Wig or DLO. In fact, we might have even improved enough to put ourselves out of the Cunningham sweepstakes.

Batum might have been a corpse last season, but somehow he has found the fountain of youth this season. He's arguably the Clippers 4th most effective player behind their 2 stars and Beverly. An eFG% of 62%, 44% on threes, and defense that. while not vintage Batum, still is far better than anything Wig or DLO bring.

Oh to go back in time and trade Wig straight up for Batum...



Yes. We've discussed Batum's resurgence previously. But I think there's some fool's gold there.

He's playing with very talented teammates who know how to play basketball... something he wouldn't have in abundance in Minnesota. I also don't think it's coincidence that he's playing better when his next million-dollar contract is on the line...

But yes... while that proposed trade had little or no short-term value... at least the Wolves could have moved on much faster. As it is... they've mortgaged the future to spin their wheels even more. Neither option was great. But ripping off band-aids never is much fun.


Yep, likely some fool's gold there for the 2 reasons you mention. I don't know for sure, however, but I think with the load management the Clips are doing this year with their 2 stars, Batum is more often than not on the court with neither of them or, at most, one of them. And his defense has been quite good, and his scoring very efficient. But I suspect that you are correct and that his performance this year would be more like what he did in Atlanta than his Clipper resurgence...of course, thereby ensuring a bottom three finish and a 40% chance of a top three pick (and in any event, a certainty of a top 5 pick in this stacked, deep draft).

Do over, please...

But regardless, he's an expiring...and I'll take big cap space and a first round pick in this year's draft over either Wig or DLO. All day.


Are we sure the Hornets would of done that deal. Wiggins means no Hayward for them



We don't know if the Hornets dug Wiggins at all to do the deal... BUT... it wouldn't have been a Wiggins or Hayward deal.

This trade would have happened long before Hayward's time in Boston was nearing its end.


I get that, but were Hornets always planning on going after Hayward in FA. I'm guessing they had some inclination that Hayward was opting out. It wouldn't of been as easy of a stretch on Wiggins contract compared to Batum
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

For those that still can't see the forest through the trees. No, DLO and KAT playing together are not going to significantly impact our win total. Do we really need to see it to know that?
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

Remember when national media made it appear like Andrew Wiggins had revolutionized his game in Golden State? Woof. He's the same guy he's always been if not slightly worse this year. I don't miss him for a second.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:For those that still can't see the forest through the trees. No, DLO and KAT playing together are not going to significantly impact our win total. Do we really need to see it to know that?


Based on what?
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Camden wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:For those that still can't see the forest through the trees. No, DLO and KAT playing together are not going to significantly impact our win total. Do we really need to see it to know that?


Based on what?

Three things:
1) I've seen DLO play
2) We're not much better if at all with him on the court vs off
3) I have a brain
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24056
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Would you do Beasley for Collins

Post by Monster »

Camden0916 wrote:Remember when national media made it appear like Andrew Wiggins had revolutionized his game in Golden State? Woof. He's the same guy he's always been if not slightly worse this year. I don't miss him for a second.


I noticed today BB reference had him listed at PF. It looks like based on other guys getting minutes that are more likely to be wing players that he might be playing a few minutes there. Anyone know if he is playing a few minutes at that spot? Personally I thought that was one thing that Wiggins had improved in over the years actually being able to defend some small ball 4's. The big weakness of playing him at PF is his lack of rebounding prowess.

Anyway...yes I agree in general Wiggins is pretty much the same guy he has been for a while.
Post Reply