KG4Ever wrote:Hopefully, we can sign KAT to an extension soon. While I think the Wolves should be open to trading DLO whether or not KAT has extended, this would take away the argument from those who think KAT would bolt if DLO were traded.
This thread/topic has nothing to do with D'Angelo Russell.
KG4Ever wrote:Hopefully, we can sign KAT to an extension soon. While I think the Wolves should be open to trading DLO whether or not KAT has extended, this would take away the argument from those who think KAT would bolt if DLO were traded.
This thread/topic has nothing to do with D'Angelo Russell.
Don't be such a hypocrite! When someone mentions trading DLO, you commonly respond that KAT will immediately ask to be traded. Problem solved if KAT is signed. You can't have it both ways. You don't own this board.
KG4Ever wrote:Hopefully, we can sign KAT to an extension soon. While I think the Wolves should be open to trading DLO whether or not KAT has extended, this would take away the argument from those who think KAT would bolt if DLO were traded.
This thread/topic has nothing to do with D'Angelo Russell.
You sound schizophrenic! When someone mentions trading DLO, you commonly respond that KAT will immediately ask to be traded. Problem solved if KAT is signed. You can't have it both ways. You don't own this board.
I don't believe I've ever said that Karl-Anthony Towns would "immediately ask to be traded" if D'Angelo Russell were to be dealt and you are routinely guilty of misquoting me and falsifying my takes. I have mentioned that trading Russell could create a rift between management and Towns, certainly. I'd double down on that after hearing what he said about instability on media day.
My point still stands. This thread concerns Towns and his extension. I fail to see why Russell was even brought up unless you were trying to spur yet another off-topic debate about him.
Lastly, we've seen multiple players -- Paul George and Ben Simmons -- request trades shortly after signing long-term deals. Once again, your take fell short.
KG4Ever wrote:Hopefully, we can sign KAT to an extension soon. While I think the Wolves should be open to trading DLO whether or not KAT has extended, this would take away the argument from those who think KAT would bolt if DLO were traded.
This thread/topic has nothing to do with D'Angelo Russell.
You sound schizophrenic! When someone mentions trading DLO, you commonly respond that KAT will immediately ask to be traded. Problem solved if KAT is signed. You can't have it both ways. You don't own this board.
I don't believe I've ever said that Karl-Anthony Towns would "immediately ask to be traded" if D'Angelo Russell were to be dealt and you are routinely guilty of misquoting me and falsifying my takes. I have mentioned that trading Russell could create a rift between management and Towns, certainly. I'd double down on that after hearing what he said about instability on media day.
My point still stands. This thread concerns Towns and his extension. I fail to see why Russell was even brought up unless you were trying to spur yet another off-topic debate about him.
Lastly, we've seen multiple players -- Paul George and Ben Simmons -- request trades shortly after signing long-term deals. Once again, your take fell short.
That's the exception not the rule. KAT's trade value would only increase if he's under contract for more years, plus the likelihood of him requesting a trade would go down too. By the way, I don't have "takes" (so its a mis-take to say I even made a take of which I think you are falsely accusing me of par-taking in making a take and to say I made a short take is just really nonsensical, but I do like strawberry shortcake).
