Wolves v Lakers GDT

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
BloopOracle
Posts: 3353
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by BloopOracle »

I hope the pelicans get Victor as we will likely be in the Eastern conference in a handful of years
User avatar
D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by D-Mac [enjin:19736340] »

Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis

That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it


I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.
User avatar
WallyBall
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by WallyBall »

D-Loser wrote:
Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis

That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it


I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.


If we win 76 games in a row will you change your mind D?
User avatar
WallyBall
Posts: 202
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2022 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by WallyBall »

D-Loser wrote:
Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis

That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it


I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.


We are not a cohesive team right now.
We have flaws, everyone that doesn't spend like the Yankees do as well.
We have a LOT of talent on this roster
I'm not ready to throw out the bath water yet
User avatar
D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by D-Mac [enjin:19736340] »

WallyWorld wrote:
D-Loser wrote:
Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis

That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it


I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.


If we win 76 games in a row will you change your mind D?


What am I wrong about? I like Rudy. We barely beat a crap team at home tonight... This isn't good. You happy where this team is at?
User avatar
D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by D-Mac [enjin:19736340] »

WallyWorld wrote:
D-Loser wrote:
Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis

That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it


I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.


We are not a cohesive team right now.
We have flaws, everyone that doesn't spend like the Yankees do as well.
We have a LOT of talent on this roster
I'm not ready to throw out the bath water yet


Yeah hopefully this is it. Tons of talent for sure
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

D-Mac wrote:
WallyWorld wrote:
D-Loser wrote:
Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis

That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it


I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.


If we win 76 games in a row will you change your mind D?


What am I wrong about? I like Rudy. We barely beat a crap team at home tonight... This isn't good. You happy where this team is at?

It's so early in the season, let this play out for 20 games and see where we are. We've looked really good at times, and not so good at others. The whole key IMO is ball movement. If we share the basketball and make the extra pass I think we can beat just about anybody in a 7 game series.
User avatar
D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by D-Mac [enjin:19736340] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
D-Mac wrote:
WallyWorld wrote:
D-Loser wrote:
Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis

That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it


I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.


If we win 76 games in a row will you change your mind D?


What am I wrong about? I like Rudy. We barely beat a crap team at home tonight... This isn't good. You happy where this team is at?

It's so early in the season, let this play out for 20 games and see where we are. We've looked really good at times, and not so good at others. The whole key IMO is ball movement. If we share the basketball and make the extra pass I think we can beat just about anybody in a 7 game series.


That 7 game series comment is a really good point... I'm with ya on that. I think we'll see the wolves pick up a defense first vet pg at some point this season... unless that's what rivers is, IDK
User avatar
Crazysauce
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by Crazysauce »

My conclusion jester Is you're a worthless piece of shit
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14518
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT

Post by kekgeek »

crazysauce wrote:My conclusion jester Is you're a worthless piece of shit


Relax
Post Reply