Wolves v Lakers GDT
- BloopOracle
- Posts: 3353
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
I hope the pelicans get Victor as we will likely be in the Eastern conference in a handful of years
- D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis
That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it
I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
D-Loser wrote:Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis
That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it
I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.
If we win 76 games in a row will you change your mind D?
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
D-Loser wrote:Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis
That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it
I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.
We are not a cohesive team right now.
We have flaws, everyone that doesn't spend like the Yankees do as well.
We have a LOT of talent on this roster
I'm not ready to throw out the bath water yet
- D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
WallyWorld wrote:D-Loser wrote:Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis
That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it
I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.
If we win 76 games in a row will you change your mind D?
What am I wrong about? I like Rudy. We barely beat a crap team at home tonight... This isn't good. You happy where this team is at?
- D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
WallyWorld wrote:D-Loser wrote:Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis
That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it
I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.
We are not a cohesive team right now.
We have flaws, everyone that doesn't spend like the Yankees do as well.
We have a LOT of talent on this roster
I'm not ready to throw out the bath water yet
Yeah hopefully this is it. Tons of talent for sure
- Coolbreeze44
- Posts: 13192
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
D-Mac wrote:WallyWorld wrote:D-Loser wrote:Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis
That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it
I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.
If we win 76 games in a row will you change your mind D?
What am I wrong about? I like Rudy. We barely beat a crap team at home tonight... This isn't good. You happy where this team is at?
It's so early in the season, let this play out for 20 games and see where we are. We've looked really good at times, and not so good at others. The whole key IMO is ball movement. If we share the basketball and make the extra pass I think we can beat just about anybody in a 7 game series.
- D-Mac [enjin:19736340]
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 am
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
CoolBreeze44 wrote:D-Mac wrote:WallyWorld wrote:D-Loser wrote:Jester1534 wrote:Hey the wolves beat winless laker team without Anthony Davis
That's my statement draw your own conclusions from it
I mean my conclusion is that last years wolves would have got an equal or better result tonight. So what's missing in the wolves equation? I'm really not sure, but Through 6 games there's definitely something wrong or missing. Just because Rudy had a good night (and is a good player), doesn't mean the team is better with him... thats the huge point I've been trying to make all along.
If we win 76 games in a row will you change your mind D?
What am I wrong about? I like Rudy. We barely beat a crap team at home tonight... This isn't good. You happy where this team is at?
It's so early in the season, let this play out for 20 games and see where we are. We've looked really good at times, and not so good at others. The whole key IMO is ball movement. If we share the basketball and make the extra pass I think we can beat just about anybody in a 7 game series.
That 7 game series comment is a really good point... I'm with ya on that. I think we'll see the wolves pick up a defense first vet pg at some point this season... unless that's what rivers is, IDK
- Crazysauce
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
My conclusion jester Is you're a worthless piece of shit
Re: Wolves v Lakers GDT
crazysauce wrote:My conclusion jester Is you're a worthless piece of shit
Relax