Simmons Prediction Thread

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by Monster »

lipoli390 wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:Two things the Sixers would have to do to have a shot at getting Simmons to come back:

1. Fire Doc Rivers
2. Trade Joel Embiid

If I were Simmons there's no way I'd play another game for Doc Rivers or with Joel Embiid. I've already received 25% of my $33M salary for this season and I'm going to get another 25% on Oct. 1. My next paycheck isn't due until Nov. 15 and if the Sixers want to fine me then, the first have to suspend me, which will further diminish my trade value to the Sixers. So why on earth would I play another game for Doc or with Joel after they both publicly threw me under the bus. Even worse, I'd be playing in front of a hostile Philly fan base and I'd look weak and lose my credibility playing under those circumstances after emphatically saying I wouldn't.

We're hearing that Gupta is on friendlier terms with Morey than Rosas was. I actually hope that's not true. I hope Gupta wants to screw Morey or is at least completely dispassionate in his approach to him. The only leverage Morey has with the Wolves now exists in what other teams are willing to offer and I wouldn't expect any offers remotely close to what Morey has been seeking. I would question and do everything possible to verify any representations makes about other offers for Simmons. And I'd have my line in the sand set firmly in concrete as to what I absolutely will not give up to get him. As my line, I would not include KAT, Edwards, McDaniels or Beverley as part of my outgoing package under any circumstances and I would not give up more than two future 1st-round picks, although I'd be willing to leave one of them totally unprotected.

Morey's not going to get Beal, Lillard or Fox for Simmons or for any other deal he might offer in the future that doesn't include Embiid. I still believe he has to come away with a package that can help the Sixers win now and that probably has to include an allstar caliber or near all-star caliber lead guard with elite offensive production to complement Embiid. D'Angelo Russell fits that profile and I believe the Wolves will eventually make him available for Simmons if they haven't already. I also expect that Sexton, Djounte Murray, CJ McCollum, Buddy Hield, VanVleet and Haliburton will be on the table as well. Whether the Wolves end up with Simmons will depend on how Morey values Russell relative to those six other guards and, to a lesser extent, what other assets are included with each of them. I suspect a deal will be done within the next two weeks.


FWIW the reporting has been that Rosas did go over his line in the sand and of course it's been reported that he went over what others in the Wolves organization was willing to give up for Russell. Dane Moore said in his last podcast that Rosas went over his line in the sand in 2020 in terms of money for both Juancho and Beasley. Beasley to me made more sense at the time (even though I was initially upset at the number) since it does sound like the Knicks were ready to make an offer. Juancho not as much. Dane said on his pod he does think Gupta is more of a collaborator and what he heard was some deals Rosas made he pretty much just went and did them. That's not necessarily a bad thing but if you are worried about an organization giving up too much I think the more people that are involved the more likely you give up less. There will be enough varied positions (take this board for example) that someone will make a strong case for only giving up assets ABC instead of ABCDE or maybe just bowing out altogether or whatever.

Only time will tell what will happen and I'm not saying I feel super confident in Gupta but as you have laid out yourself a time or 2 Rosas Likely has given up more than the line in the sand to get what he wanted. Sometimes that's worth it as we saw in the Jrue Holiday deal. Sometimes it's a disaster and I'm talking something much worse than the moves Rosas made...well except the Culver one is pretty bad. Gupta conveniently wasn't here for that one though. :)


Excellent post, Monster. I hadn't heard those reports from the Dane Moore podcast. But I'm not surprised either. We're starting to get a pretty clear picture of Rosas as a PBO who repeatedly did things against what was probably the consensus advice of his other top basketball execs, including but not limited to Gupta. That was definitely Gersson's prerogative, but that type of approach generally undermines an organization's morale and, as you suggested, it can lead to bad decisions. I can imagine how some things might have gone down. I'll suggest the following possible scenarios just for fun:

1. Gersson loved Darius Garland and wanted to trade up to get him. Gupta and the other basketball front office staff probably really liked Garland too. Here's what might have happened. Rosas came up with the Phoenix deal and ran it by the group. They all liked the idea of trading up for Garland, but Gupta reminded Rosas that there was no assurance the Wolves could get Garland because the Cavs might take him. Gupta then reminded Rosas that the general rule of thumb for lottery teams is to draft the best player available and hat Garland was clearly the best on the board at that point. Rosas pushed back that the Cavs already had a PG in Sexton, but Gupta reminded Rosas that he wasn't the only PBO who believed in positionless basketball. Rosas stubbornly dismissed the possibility that Cleveland might take Garland and he figured he could always give up a little bit to pry Garland away from Cleveland anyway. Gupta, backed by the rest of the front office team, told Rosas that he should assume Kobe Altman loved Garland as much as he did and that there was a big drop off from Garland to Culver and other options. Rosas then abruptly ended the discussion by thanking them for their input and telling them he was going to do the deal with Phoenix. Of course, Cleveland ended up taking Garland and obviously rebuffed all of Gersson's efforts to do a deal to get him. Gupta then came to Rosas with a number of creative proposals to trade back into the draft and take a player at least as good as Culver while also getting another asset or two. But Gersson shot him down without explanation. Of course, trading back in would have been an embarrassing concession by Rosas that he screwed up. Gupta and the rest of the staff were already frustrated by what they saw as a poor decision to trade up for someone they weren't sure they could get. They became even more frustrated by Gersson's decision to compound his mistake just to save face at the expense of the organization. But alas, that's the way it goes and I'm sure they got over it. But the pattern continued.

2. After the draft that year, Gersson wined and dined DLO and was intent on signing him as his signature free-agent acquisition. The rest of the organization dutifully helped, but wondered all along whether a poor defender was the right fit to pair with KAT. They also questioned how the Wolves would clear enough salary space to sign him. Then DLO surprised everyone by signing with Golden State. That had to be a big let-down for Rosas and a bit embarrassing. From that moment on, he was determined to get Russell and as the trade deadline approached, he worked a deal to get him. Gupta and the rest of Gersson's front office told Rosas they weren't sure it made sense to add another poor defender as our "other star." They also told Rosas they thought Golden State's asking price was too much, that there were no other serious suitors for DLO and that Rosas was effectively bidding against himself. They told Gersson he could wait until the off-season and DLO would still be there. Rosas responded that he wasn't going to take the chance of losing Russell twice and, therefore, he wasn't going to worry about defense given "the style they wanted to play" and he wasn't going to quibble over how protected the first-round pick was or whether to also include a 2nd-round pick, which would likely be a high one. So he proceeded to make the deal - once again, ignoring the consensus advice of his top front office staff.

3. The off-season arrived and Gersson was determined to re-sign all the players he traded for. Gupta and others advised against paying too much for either one given how the team's payroll was getting really high while the team was still a bottom lottery team. They noted that no other teams were aggressively pursing either Beasley or Juancho - especially Juancho. Once again, Rosas went off on his own and signed both at amounts his front office colleagues considered excessive based on their assessment of the market for those players.

4. The next year, Rosas was determined to acquire Ricky Rubio after trying and failing to get him the previous year. Once again, Rosas always gets his main - like the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Gupta and his staff warned him that spending that sort of money for a backup PG was problematic and that they needed to balance the roster by beefing up the front court. Rosas responded that they didn't need more size given the style they wanted to play. Once again, Rosas ignored their advice and engineered a deal for Rubio.

The saving grace in all of this was that someone in the organization, maybe Rosas, displayed a good eye for talent. That eye for talent led to Naz Reid, J-Mac, Anthony Edwards and Jaden McDaniels. If we presume Rosas was a lone wolf, then we should probably give Rosas credit for those signings and picks. And it's still possible that Russell will pan out.

Assuming we go with our current roster next season, we'll get a good measure of how effective Rosas was as the Wolves PBO because it's definitely the roster he built. And if the Wolves do as well as I think they can, then it's too bad he couldn't be more collaborative with his front office colleagues in the basketball department and a lot less "collaborative" with a certain female VP in the communications department.


Lip I enjoyed your fan fiction! I'm willing to buy in that Rosas might have went rogue or made the decision to go beyond what he planned to for a couple of these deals. Supposedly he pretty much just went and got Beverly too which was a terrific move. Meanwhile whether Rosas was bidding against himself or the Knicks Beasley and his contract is still regarded as an asset so if he did that good for Rosas. I'm just not into blaming Rosas for all the bad stuff although I know that wasn't your point.

There is an interesting perspective shared from the Punch Drunk Wolves writer on Dane Moore's last podcast. You should check it out if you can find the time.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by Monster »

lipoli390 wrote:There are some who say that the Wolves will need to get a third team involved to get a deal done for Simmons. If that's true, then I don't see Simmons ending up in Minnesota. The need for a 3rd team presumes the Wolves don't have the win-now player the Sixers would insist on getting in return for Simmons. It also presumes there's a team that has the win-now player the Sixers would want but no interest in winning any time soon. In other words, it would be a team in full early rebuild mode that's willing to give up the win-now player Morey wants in return for future picks and young prospects other than Edwards on the Wolves roster.

I can't think of any rebuilding teams that has and would be willing to part with a player Philly would want as the key win-now player they need. I don't see that sort of player on the Pistons or Magic rosters. I don't see OKC trading SGA for future picks or young prospects on the Wolves roster not named Edwards. OKC has a surplus of picks already and their next step will be to convert those picks into talent to pair with SGA. Would I can't come up with a rebuilding team that would have a player Philly would want and prefer trading that player for future picks from MN rather than Simmons. Toronto? Cleveland? Would Toronto prefer to trade VanVleet for future picks from Minnesota instead of Simmons? Would Cleveland prefer to trade Sexton for future picks instead of Simmons? Spurs DeJounte Murray for picks instead of Simmons? I don't think so.


I think Cleveland would still be a possibility but I agree it's a tough road. The question I have if Cleveland is involved is who the Sixers would prefer...Sexton or Russell. As far as we know the Sixers aren't particularly interested in either guy but they may have to change their tune. I was remembering (might be recalling incorrectly) during the Butler saga a report that the Wolves didn't have interest in Saric which to me didn't make a whole lot of sense. Sometimes teams end up with players they weren't super interested in initially. Russell seems to fit better with Embiid (takes more shots outside the paint and is more of a PG) but Sexton's scoring stats at such a young age is REALLY intriguing although he isn't really a PG.

Lip if you were Morey which guy would you prefer knowing you may have to pay up for Sexton on his next contract? I think we are both going into this blind not seeing Sexton play enough but I'll be honest I think I would go out on a limb and take Sexton but sitting here I don't have anything on the line but my pride. Lol
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15295
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by Lipoli390 »

Fan Fiction. I love it, Monster. I should start a blog by that title. You clearly go my point. I actually loved the Beasley acquisition and I never had a problem the contract Rosas gave him. When it comes to the bad stuff, I'm going to give Rosas all the blame. But I'll give him all the credit on the good stuff. On balance, I think he was a net plus good over bad. If Russell becomes a consistent version of himself in his one all-star season and Edwards continues his development trajectory from the latter half of last season, then I'd say Gersson's tenure was a pretty substantial net plus. As I noted in my post, all he had to do was be a little more collaborative with his basketball colleagues and a lot less collaborative with his communications VP and he'd still be the Wolves PBO.

Alas... The saga continues. We know Rosas was a loner and unfaithful. Was he also a Russian spy? Was he using the Wolves Communications VP to gain control of the Wolves communications apparatus as part of a bigger plan to destabilize the Wolves, the NBA and eventually the entire Country on behalf of Putin? Stay tuned for the next exciting addition of Fan Fiction.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15295
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by Lipoli390 »

monsterpile wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:There are some who say that the Wolves will need to get a third team involved to get a deal done for Simmons. If that's true, then I don't see Simmons ending up in Minnesota. The need for a 3rd team presumes the Wolves don't have the win-now player the Sixers would insist on getting in return for Simmons. It also presumes there's a team that has the win-now player the Sixers would want but no interest in winning any time soon. In other words, it would be a team in full early rebuild mode that's willing to give up the win-now player Morey wants in return for future picks and young prospects other than Edwards on the Wolves roster.

I can't think of any rebuilding teams that has and would be willing to part with a player Philly would want as the key win-now player they need. I don't see that sort of player on the Pistons or Magic rosters. I don't see OKC trading SGA for future picks or young prospects on the Wolves roster not named Edwards. OKC has a surplus of picks already and their next step will be to convert those picks into talent to pair with SGA. Would I can't come up with a rebuilding team that would have a player Philly would want and prefer trading that player for future picks from MN rather than Simmons. Toronto? Cleveland? Would Toronto prefer to trade VanVleet for future picks from Minnesota instead of Simmons? Would Cleveland prefer to trade Sexton for future picks instead of Simmons? Spurs DeJounte Murray for picks instead of Simmons? I don't think so.


I think Cleveland would still be a possibility but I agree it's a tough road. The question I have if Cleveland is involved is who the Sixers would prefer...Sexton or Russell. As far as we know the Sixers aren't particularly interested in either guy but they may have to change their tune. I was remembering (might be recalling incorrectly) during the Butler saga a report that the Wolves didn't have interest in Saric which to me didn't make a whole lot of sense. Sometimes teams end up with players they weren't super interested in initially. Russell seems to fit better with Embiid (takes more shots outside the paint and is more of a PG) but Sexton's scoring stats at such a young age is REALLY intriguing although he isn't really a PG.

Lip if you were Morey which guy would you prefer knowing you may have to pay up for Sexton on his next contract? I think we are both going into this blind not seeing Sexton play enough but I'll be honest I think I would go out on a limb and take Sexton but sitting here I don't have anything on the line but my pride. Lol


I come down the same place as you on Sexton over Russell. Like you, I don't have much of my own observations of Sexton's play. Statistically, both he and Russell are good offensive players but really bad defenders. But Sexton has the clear edge over Russell in the following respects:

1. Sexton is the better and far more efficient scorer of the two. Sexton's career scoring average is 20.2 compared to DLO's 17.6. Sexton has hit 45.8% of his field goals compared to DLO's 42.1%, 38.5% of his threes compared to DLO's 36% and 83.1% of his free throws on 4.4 attempts compared to DLO's 77.1% on 3 attempts. Sexton has a career TS of 55.1% compared to Russell's 52.9%.

2. Sexton appears to be more durable than Russell.

3. Sexton is known for playing consistently hard and being a fierce competitors, which are things that sometimes seem lacking in Russell
'
5. Sexton is younger with more upside.

Russell is the better playmaker and might have a broader offensive skill set than Sexton. So the case could me make that Russell would be the better get for the Sixers. But if I had to make the decision today for the Sixers, I'd take Sexton over DLO. I wouldn't be deterred by the need to pay Sexton. The Sixers would have to pay DLO's max salary for another two years. So I wouldn't be concerned about the potential need to give Sexton a big contract to keep him. If you ask me whether I'd rather have DLO and Beasley or Sexton and Love, I'd take the DLO/Beasley package. I hope the Wolves don't offer both DLO and Beasley, but I think that duo plus a couple 2nd-round picks and a protected 1st might be enough. Otherwise, I think Sexton and Love plus a few future picks would be a nice return for Simmons and I'd be all over that one if I were Morey.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by Monster »

lipoli390 wrote:Fan Fiction. I love it, Monster. I should start a blog by that title. You clearly go my point. I actually loved the Beasley acquisition and I never had a problem the contract Rosas gave him. When it comes to the bad stuff, I'm going to give Rosas all the blame. But I'll give him all the credit on the good stuff. On balance, I think he was a net plus good over bad. If Russell becomes a consistent version of himself in his one all-star season and Edwards continues his development trajectory from the latter half of last season, then I'd say Gersson's tenure was a pretty substantial net plus. As I noted in my post, all he had to do was be a little more collaborative with his basketball colleagues and a lot less collaborative with his communications VP and he'd still be the Wolves PBO.

Alas... The saga continues. We know Rosas was a loner and unfaithful. Was he also a Russian spy? Was he using the Wolves Communications VP to gain control of the Wolves communications apparatus as part of a bigger plan to destabilize the Wolves, the NBA and eventually the entire Country on behalf of Putin? Stay tuned for the next exciting addition of Fan Fiction.


I cannot wait for the next installment! Gonna be hard to even sleep tonight with anticipation of what's coming next!!!
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3010
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

Anybody see this interview with Matisse Thybulle talking about Simmons on the JJ Redick podcast?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbTcDbfa4Cs

It's good. I think Thybulle puts his finger pretty well on how our public expectations as fans, and in particular the intense expectations of Philly fans, has helped bring this scenario to a head.

Also, every time I've seen them play the last couple of years, I remember thinking that Thybulle was almost as good a man defender as Simmons is--if he was a bit stronger, I'd say they were even. (Seriously, if you guys have League Pass but haven't watched him much, and if you like watching defense, go watch some old Sixers games from the last couple years. He's so freakin' good at bottling guys up.) Anyway, he also just seems to be a really level-headed, observant, and thoughtful guy. No way the Sixers trade his defense, especially since they'll almost certainly be trading Simmons, but I'd have loved to hear him talk about the Wolves from inside the organization almost as much as watching him defend in a Wolves uniform. Then again, he doesn't really do anything else--which would add to our stock of one-way players. : (
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15295
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by Lipoli390 »

SameOldNudityDrew wrote:Anybody see this interview with Matisse Thybulle talking about Simmons on the JJ Redick podcast?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbTcDbfa4Cs

It's good. I think Thybulle puts his finger pretty well on how our public expectations as fans, and in particular the intense expectations of Philly fans, has helped bring this scenario to a head.

Also, every time I've seen them play the last couple of years, I remember thinking that Thybulle was almost as good a man defender as Simmons is--if he was a bit stronger, I'd say they were even. (Seriously, if you guys have League Pass but haven't watched him much, and if you like watching defense, go watch some old Sixers games from the last couple years. He's so freakin' good at bottling guys up.) Anyway, he also just seems to be a really level-headed, observant, and thoughtful guy. No way the Sixers trade his defense, especially since they'll almost certainly be trading Simmons, but I'd have loved to hear him talk about the Wolves from inside the organization almost as much as watching him defend in a Wolves uniform. Then again, he doesn't really do anything else--which would add to our stock of one-way players. : (


Thanks for posting, Drew. I have NBA League pass and have watched quite a bit of Matisse. I loved him coming out of college and was hoping the Wolves could find a way to draft him. I'd never heard him interviewed before watching this video. He's a really nice, thoughtful and impressive dude. Interesting to hear him say that Simmons bears some responsibility - not his exact words, but essentially what he said. JJ said the same thing. I don't think Simmons bears any responsibility for the current drama surrounding the Sixers' effort to trade him. The drama was created by Embiid, Rivers and Morey - all self-inflicted wounds. Simmons has no obligation to enhance his trade value for sake of the Sixers. Perhaps Matisse was referring to Ben's failure to improved his shooting or at least take shots that the team was encouraging him to take. Simmons obviously bears responsibility for those failures. But I don't think that's what Matisse or JJ meant.

As JJ said, the Sixers threw Ben under the bus and essentially made him the scapegoat for the organization's collective failure once again to advance further in the playoffs. Matisse made a very interesting comment. He mentioned that he committed the foul that lost the final playoff game this year. He said the Ben Simmons hate was so big by that time, that he received almost no negative chatter or attention for his series ending foul. That's telling. Philadelphia fans and media are tough. When you play for a Philadelphia team and your own team fails to protect you and, worse yet, publicly throws you under the bus, you can't help but want out. That's where things are today and that's why Simmons will be traded for a return that's less than his talent and far less than Morey expected to get.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 15295
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by Lipoli390 »

NBA Central: "I talked to Rich Paul, and Rich Paul was the one who told me, 'We want out. We want out. And we'll go to whatever degree we have to go to in order to get out. We want to be anywhere but in Philadelphia.'" - @RealJayWilliams (Via ESPN | h/t Bleacher Report) pic.twitter.com/8TzNQQi1LB - via Twitter TheNBACentral.

Yet further confirmation of the reality that Ben will be traded and that he'll be traded sooner rather than later.
User avatar
FNG
Posts: 4599
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by FNG »

SameOldNudityDrew wrote:Anybody see this interview with Matisse Thybulle talking about Simmons on the JJ Redick podcast?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbTcDbfa4Cs

It's good. I think Thybulle puts his finger pretty well on how our public expectations as fans, and in particular the intense expectations of Philly fans, has helped bring this scenario to a head.

Also, every time I've seen them play the last couple of years, I remember thinking that Thybulle was almost as good a man defender as Simmons is--if he was a bit stronger, I'd say they were even. (Seriously, if you guys have League Pass but haven't watched him much, and if you like watching defense, go watch some old Sixers games from the last couple years. He's so freakin' good at bottling guys up.) Anyway, he also just seems to be a really level-headed, observant, and thoughtful guy. No way the Sixers trade his defense, especially since they'll almost certainly be trading Simmons, but I'd have loved to hear him talk about the Wolves from inside the organization almost as much as watching him defend in a Wolves uniform. Then again, he doesn't really do anything else--which would add to our stock of one-way players. : (


Thanks for that, Drew...love the way this young man skillfully handled a tough question from Reddick. Quite impressive.

I love Thybulle's D too, so his admiration for how Simmons can lock down an offensive player (including Luka) has a lot of credibility.

I note Matisse's 44% free throw percentage last season, and knowing his countryman also struggles from the line, I can only conclude free throw shooting is not practiced in Australia.

(mostly kidding...Matisse was a 78% guy in college who forgot how to shoot in front of the brutally unforgiving Philly fans. Hmm...more evidence that playing in Philly is detrimental to Ben's shooting?)
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Simmons Prediction Thread

Post by Monster »

FNG wrote:
SameOldNudityDrew wrote:Anybody see this interview with Matisse Thybulle talking about Simmons on the JJ Redick podcast?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbTcDbfa4Cs

It's good. I think Thybulle puts his finger pretty well on how our public expectations as fans, and in particular the intense expectations of Philly fans, has helped bring this scenario to a head.

Also, every time I've seen them play the last couple of years, I remember thinking that Thybulle was almost as good a man defender as Simmons is--if he was a bit stronger, I'd say they were even. (Seriously, if you guys have League Pass but haven't watched him much, and if you like watching defense, go watch some old Sixers games from the last couple years. He's so freakin' good at bottling guys up.) Anyway, he also just seems to be a really level-headed, observant, and thoughtful guy. No way the Sixers trade his defense, especially since they'll almost certainly be trading Simmons, but I'd have loved to hear him talk about the Wolves from inside the organization almost as much as watching him defend in a Wolves uniform. Then again, he doesn't really do anything else--which would add to our stock of one-way players. : (


Thanks for that, Drew...love the way this young man skillfully handled a tough question from Reddick. Quite impressive.

I love Thybulle's D too, so his admiration for how Simmons can lock down an offensive player (including Luka) has a lot of credibility.

I note Matisse's 44% free throw percentage last season, and knowing his countryman also struggles from the line, I can only conclude free throw shooting is not practiced in Australia.

(mostly kidding...Matisse was a 78% guy in college who forgot how to shoot in front of the brutally unforgiving Philly fans. Hmm...more evidence that playing in Philly is detrimental to Ben's shooting?)


He has also taken 64 FTs in his entire NBA career. I think the fact that he doesn't really try and score is more of a problem. If some fans yelling at you or whatever means you can't make a FT that's a problem. Again were the Wolves fans too nice to Culver? We should be more mean to some of these guys if only Philly and MN fans could learn from each other and find that magic middle ground. :)

To me the fact that they have a guy like him on the roster makes a Simmons deal make even more sense. They can't be playing those guys together much and it does seem like Thybulle's D is pretty legit already.
Post Reply