Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

thedoper wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:Don't forget that if Rose doesn't work out for the Knicks, they have $21 large coming off the books after this year. That cap space will be huge the summer of 2017.


That's the thing. They get one year to properly evaluate if there is anything in the tank. There was so little to be done with the financial constraints of their franchise and Jackson seems to be inching them back to relevance. I actually love Hornacek for them too. I like this deal a lot and trust Jackson's evaluation of Jerian Grant.


Yeah, I guess I can see the salary angle to it...but how long were the guys they traded away locked in for? How much of that money would have been freed up anyway?
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 10633
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by thedoper »

Q12543 wrote:
thedoper wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Faried is interesting. Always seemed like a low IQ defender to me though. I get that he hustles his ass off and gets rebounds, but just not so sure he really does much for us defensively, despite his high motor.


I think Thibs would make him play to his strengths. If he just focused on his man and freed up Towns to rove a bit more I could see them being an elite unit. But if they are constantly switching down low I'd be worried about Faried's read and react. So strange since his is clearly a gifted athlete. I do like thinking about the intensity that Faried would bring, would be fun to watch.


Well, he certainly fits the "do shit" profile I love, i.e. he doesn't need to score the ball all the time to be effective. And he adds toughness and ferocious energy in a slot most likely playing between Wiggins and KAT. He would be very complementary in that regard.

But still....for all the energy, rebounding, and killer games against the Wolves, his overall defense is sort of meh. But perhaps I'm nit-picking a bit here. Not every starter can be the perfect two-way player.



I didn't mean to imply that he is even above average at this point defensively. I just know that Thibs is coming from a position and a coaching tree which believes that anyone can defend. I am all on board with this. Hell Vince Carter has looked like an excellent defender late in his career. It's hard not to look at Faried and think that he couldn't become an elite defender in this league. If Thibs is truly interested, I assume that is the angle.
User avatar
SameOldNudityDrew
Posts: 3010
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by SameOldNudityDrew »

Camden wrote:Robin Lopez would have looked good in Minnesota. Just saying.


That is true too.

Lopez is more of a sure thing, and Noah's more of a gamble, depending on how much he can get back to form. But I'd love his passing for us, and he was a more mobile defender. Unfortunately, I have to so "was" because it's been a couple season, and it's not clear how much he'll be able to get back to his old self.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

Calderon's $7M was coming off after next year. Lopez's $13M per year is great value. Could have dumped that at any time if they actually needed to. The salary angle is a weak one, IMO. To me, Chicago got the best end of this trade.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 9966
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

Chicago simply needed to move on from Derrick Rose.

They had a brief, magical run that turned into a clownshow... unfortunately.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12119
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

How about #5 and Bazz, for #7 and Faried?
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by Monster »

Well if Rose works out its a great deal for the Knicks. If not they can let him go and have cap space after this year. I wouldn't say that's a great worst case downside of the deal but alive seen worse.

For Chicago a sneaky part of the deal is they get Calderon who isn't the player he once was but what he can still do is shoot 3's. Guess what Hooberg wants to do? Shoot 3's. He should at least provide something decent for the year he will be there and I can see Hoiberg possibly getting a little something more out of him than he was giving the Knicks. Obviously getting Lopez and just moving on from Rose is the best part of the deal but Calderon could help them a bit.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:How about #5 and Bazz, for #7 and Faried?


I would want to include Pek's deal if I'm moving the higher pick AND the younger, cheaper player.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

monsterpile wrote:Well if Rose works out its a great deal for the Knicks. If not they can let him go and have cap space after this year. I wouldn't say that's a great worst case downside of the deal but alive seen worse.

For Chicago a sneaky part of the deal is they get Calderon who isn't the player he once was but what he can still do is shoot 3's. Guess what Hooberg wants to do? Shoot 3's. He should at least provide something decent for the year he will be there and I can see Hoiberg possibly getting a little something more out of him than he was giving the Knicks. Obviously getting Lopez and just moving on from Rose is the best part of the deal but Calderon could help them a bit.


Calderon's pretty much just salary filler. I do think there's a sneaky part to this trade for them, though, and that's Jerian Grant. I think he'll have plenty of opportunities next year to show what he can do.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12119
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Official 2016 Offseasont Thread (Free Agents/Trades/Front Office Moves)

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

Camden wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:How about #5 and Bazz, for #7 and Faried?


I would want to include Pek's deal if I'm moving the higher pick AND the younger, cheaper player.

We most likely come out of the offseason with Hield, Faried, and Noah.
Post Reply