DLO

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12115
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

crazy-canuck wrote:Suns beat writer is reporting that the suns are out on dlo.

Maybe teams are scared off because dlo to the wolves is all but done.

Or maybe we're one of a few teams who see him as a max player.
User avatar
apollotsg [enjin:6592798]
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by apollotsg [enjin:6592798] »

Or maybe Russel knows he is getting max from any team he wants with the room but wants to go to the Timberwolves so he is not talking to other teams.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by Monster »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
crazy-canuck wrote:Suns beat writer is reporting that the suns are out on dlo.

Maybe teams are scared off because dlo to the wolves is all but done.

Or maybe we're one of a few teams who see him as a max player.


Windhorst suggested that may be the case on Wolfson's podcast. I think that could give us an advantage. I don't see him as a max player but again if we basically swap Wiggins max for Russell's max it would be look at this point to be a big win.
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1837
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by TheGrey08 »

Camden wrote:
I'd imagine the Wolves meet with J.J. Reddick, but it makes sense for him to return to Philadelphia. With how much focus Rosas places on three-point shooting, I'd imagine he'd want a proven shooter starting at the 2. Neither Okogie or Culver are that right now.

Names will continue to be floated around, but I think Jeremy Lamb with a large portion of the MLE would make a ton of sense. He's a three-level scorer with length and is a very underrated defender. Very good shooter off the catch. He's also trending upward as he had plenty of career highs last year.

If it were up to me, I'd like to see Russell-Lamb-Covington as our 1-3 with a defensive-minded, gritty big next to Towns in the starting lineup. Obviously, Taj Gibson would be who I wanted to fit this billet.

It sounds like Reddick might be at the same facility that the Wolves are meeting with Russell at tonight.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12115
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
crazy-canuck wrote:Suns beat writer is reporting that the suns are out on dlo.

Maybe teams are scared off because dlo to the wolves is all but done.

Or maybe we're one of a few teams who see him as a max player.


Windhorst suggested that may be the case on Wolfson's podcast. I think that could give us an advantage. I don't see him as a max player but again if we basically swap Wiggins max for Russell's max it would be look at this point to be a big win.

Having Russell under a max over Wiggins may be a win, but both situations cap our potential in my opinion.
User avatar
Duke13
Posts: 1673
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by Duke13 »

It's a big win!
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by Monster »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
crazy-canuck wrote:Suns beat writer is reporting that the suns are out on dlo.

Maybe teams are scared off because dlo to the wolves is all but done.

Or maybe we're one of a few teams who see him as a max player.


Windhorst suggested that may be the case on Wolfson's podcast. I think that could give us an advantage. I don't see him as a max player but again if we basically swap Wiggins max for Russell's max it would be look at this point to be a big win.

Having Russell under a max over Wiggins may be a win, but both situations cap our potential in my opinion.


It is a gamble. It all depends on how you view Russell. It also depends on how you view having Russell for max which is over X amount you think he is worth or...not getting him at all. To offset the Russell possible overpay the Wolves need to find/develop their bargain contract guy and they have one in Covington already.
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1837
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by TheGrey08 »

monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Or maybe we're one of a few teams who see him as a max player.


Windhorst suggested that may be the case on Wolfson's podcast. I think that could give us an advantage. I don't see him as a max player but again if we basically swap Wiggins max for Russell's max it would be look at this point to be a big win.

Yeah that tidbit was interesting with him saying he thinks Russell gets offers around 20m on the open market (including the Lakers). If the Wolves can get him for closer to that, it would be a nice get.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 12115
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
crazy-canuck wrote:Suns beat writer is reporting that the suns are out on dlo.

Maybe teams are scared off because dlo to the wolves is all but done.

Or maybe we're one of a few teams who see him as a max player.


Windhorst suggested that may be the case on Wolfson's podcast. I think that could give us an advantage. I don't see him as a max player but again if we basically swap Wiggins max for Russell's max it would be look at this point to be a big win.

Having Russell under a max over Wiggins may be a win, but both situations cap our potential in my opinion.


It is a gamble. It all depends on how you view Russell. It also depends on how you view having Russell for max which is over X amount you think he is worth or...not getting him at all. To offset the Russell possible overpay the Wolves need to find/develop their bargain contract guy and they have one in Covington already.

I'm just saying I'd rather have Russell than Wiggins, and I'd rather have Russell than not have him. But I wonder if he is really a max player if you're trying to field a championship team.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 23395
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: DLO

Post by Monster »

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
crazy-canuck wrote:Suns beat writer is reporting that the suns are out on dlo.

Maybe teams are scared off because dlo to the wolves is all but done.

Or maybe we're one of a few teams who see him as a max player.


Windhorst suggested that may be the case on Wolfson's podcast. I think that could give us an advantage. I don't see him as a max player but again if we basically swap Wiggins max for Russell's max it would be look at this point to be a big win.

Having Russell under a max over Wiggins may be a win, but both situations cap our potential in my opinion.


It is a gamble. It all depends on how you view Russell. It also depends on how you view having Russell for max which is over X amount you think he is worth or...not getting him at all. To offset the Russell possible overpay the Wolves need to find/develop their bargain contract guy and they have one in Covington already.

I'm just saying I'd rather have Russell than Wiggins, and I'd rather have Russell than not have him. But I wonder if he is really a max player if you're trying to field a championship team.


I agree. I think the risk (especially if we give up pretty limited assets AND move on from Wiggins) is probably worth it. If Rosas pulls all that off AND gets Russell for less than the max? Ok ok I need to calm down. Lol time to go outside for a while.
Post Reply