Camden wrote:Hicks123 wrote:Long, are we seriously arguing here that either KG or Prince are net positives in REAL games? I see the numbers, but what I see on TV certainly resembles nothing short of a couple hot turds. I can't explain the numbers, other than the fact that they play very sporadic minutes, and always with the best players on the team playing next to them. Based on the numbers, you would think these two guys are leading this team in productive minutes....and I LOUDLY disagree.
Are people seriously still OK with KG making $8.5MM this season and a guaranteed $8MM next? It is CRAZY!!!!! He is freakin' abysmal!!!! And I will state again that when the extended losing happens....and it will....the KG mentor thing will go out the door. He will obtain the same loser mentality of this team. Our only saving grace is that I have to believe that KG will retire after this season, thus foregoing his contract next year.
I'm glad there's still sane beings on this board. Hicks is exactly right here. Isn't it ironic how the two highest +/- on the team come from the two guys that only play their minutes with the three best players on the team? It's the other three (Rubio, Towns, Wiggins ?) that have been doing the heavy lifting in those minutes, which make KG and Prince's +/- look better than it really is.
And yes, KG's contract is absurd. I've argued that plenty of times, but I either get told "we had no other way to spend the money" or "you're just not understanding everything KG brings to the table", both of which are laughable retorts.
Well, I'm not a psychiatrist, so I'm not going to comment on the relative sanity of Hicks, you and me. But I will say that Hicks' and your math and logic skills may be a little lacking.
You argue that the plus 12.6 per 35 for both Tay and KG is because of the other three starters. If that were true and Tay and KG are really stiffs, wouldn't logic dictate that Rubio, Wig and KAT's +/- numbers would go up when they are playing with players other than Tay and KG? But in fact, their number go way down, and in the case of Wig and KAT, their +/- plummets dramatically when KG and Tay leave the court. Wig and KAT play about 30 minutes a game, and since they start each half with KG and Tay, only about half of those minutes are with the two vets...and we can assume that their +/- in those minutes approximates the glossy numbers Tay and KG are putting up since they are on the court together. Ergo, Wig and KAT have a much worse +/- playing with the players who sub in for Tay and KG. It looks to me like KG and Tay are buoying up the numbers of the other three starters, rather than the other way around that you are suggesting.
KG and Tay are not going to put up offensive numbers...that's not their role. They are charged with setting a defensive tone and facilitating for our offensive stars, and the numbers say that so far they are handling their job with aplomb. I see tour statement that the heavy lifting on the starters is being done by the other three starters, but I can't find numbers that help me understand that conclusion. What am I missing here?