WolvesFan21 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:WolvesFan21 wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:When you look at the number of white coaches employed vs the number of african Americans, the law of averages tells you there must be an awful lot of good black coaching candidates out there. I think you would be foolish not to look at the best of them for your job. If the 20th best white coach has a job, the 11th best black coach certainly deserves a look.
There are likely way more white head coaches and candidates in the lower levels though as well, along with assistants. High School, NCAA, other Pro leagues around the world. You don't have to be a former NBA player to become an NBA coach, you can and many do work their way up through smaller positions. A guy like Spoelstra, He started out doing video coordination for them in 1995. I looked it up and he was a player-assistant coach for some German second division basketball team prior.
If you look at the big picture I would say the ratio is likely right in line. In fact I would say most ex NBA players are not looking at becoming a HC nor are willing to put in the hours to do so. They are not as financially motivated to succeed at the position as others who worked menial jobs. They are more unlikely to take a small position and put in the time to work their way up.
- There are about 35 white Americans in the NBA.
- There are about 300 black Americans in the NBA.
There are 6 white former NBA players coaching.
There are 3 black former NBA players coaching.
Now granted, just because you're a player doesn't make you a good coach. And I don't know if there are more white former players who are assistant coaches putting in their time than black former players as assistant coaches putting in their time. We'd need those numbers to see just how relevant this is.
But I have seen a stat from a few years ago that shows that about 40% of NBA assistant coaches are black. I'm unsure how many of those are former NBA players.
[Note: Technically, Nash is a Canadian or South African... but I included him.]
Good stat dig. It's certainly possible that a genetic survival trait to band together with someone who looks more like them could still be relevant today. People for hundreds of years lived together with the same race. Only recently in the grand scheme has that changed. Is the GM or POB more inclined to trust someone who looks like them because of this natural evolution and history? I think that is possible.
I don't think you can absolutely make that conclusion however with such a small number statistically. If it holds true in the long run it may make sense.
There are many more possible factors as well like you said. Complicated topic.
It could be a "genetic survival trait" or "natural evolution"... or... even systemic racism. It could even be something else entirely.
What we do know is that racism does exist. And it has existed in pro sports, including the NBA, even if it wasn't part of the Timberwolves hire... or any recent hires at all.
Because of the history with racism, however, I'm fine with requests for transparency... if the decisions by organizations are respected and outside forces aren't forcing them to hire specific people. In the end, if you think a white coach is better for your $3B business, hire that person. If you think it's a black guy... hire that person.
Someday, we can hope this isn't an issue. But we're not there yet.