Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
- JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
I also want to expand the TOR deal to include a Coyle for Matthews swap.
That's for you Camden (great job naming yourself after the worst city in one of the worst states).
That's for you Camden (great job naming yourself after the worst city in one of the worst states).
- AbeVigodaLive
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
Anybody else amused at how Jason seems a bit compelled to insert as many mini-insults as he can into his stuff?
- JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Anybody else amused at how Jason seems a bit compelled to insert as many mini-insults as he can into his stuff.
I learned from the best, Fish. And thanks for going the whole day without taking a shot at Terry Ryan.
- Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
- Posts: 13844
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Anybody else amused at how Jason seems a bit compelled to insert as many mini-insults as he can into his stuff?
He's baaaaa-aaaaaack!
- JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
Q12543 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:Anybody else amused at how Jason seems a bit compelled to insert as many mini-insults as he can into his stuff?
He's baaaaa-aaaaaack!
Dang right Q. I am single-handedly save this franchise and it's confused fans from New-Terrell-Owens. You're welcome.
- Camden [enjin:6601484]
- Posts: 18065
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
JasonIsDaMan wrote:Camden wrote:JasonIsDaMan wrote:Q12543 wrote:crazy-canuck wrote:Butler questionable tonight.
Og also sitting for no apparent reason.
Maybe masai is making a last minute move.
Butler/Leonard is a nightmarish wing pairing for opposing teams and they can switch everything. I'm surprised there hasn't been more buzz around Toronto.
LOVE IT!!!
JB/JP/TJ/KBD to TOR for DG/NP/DW/PS/3 1sts/3 swaps/7 Seconds (assuming TOR is 21-30 this year, if not, then 5 2nds)
I know this more me being nitpicky and argumentative than anything else, but it's hard to take some of your posts seriously -- mainly because of your incessant need to include unrealistic pick swaps and ridiculous amount of second-round picks flying everywhere. Find me one deal in basketball history where a team traded seven second-round picks, or even five.
Here's how I got to this. See if you can follow. If you can't, go ahead and print it out to reread later.
HOU offered 4 1sts. That's called an offer. You then ask for more, which is called a counter-offer. Is a three 1st's/ three swap REALLY that much different than the BKN/BOS trade? Also in every trade I have mentioned, JB is clearly the best player, so why wouldn't MIN get something back? And why aren't you going the people who think 4 1st is "not enough" for a guy WHO IS GOING TO LEEEEEEEEEAVE!?!?!
I have a job-slash-life, so I'm not going to go through all these threads, but if I did, are you ABSOLUTELY sure I couldn't find some of your that I find "hard to take seriously"? Weren't you one the guys who thought Aaron Aflalo was the next Bernard King? Or on the strength 3 good playoff games against second teamers that Bismarck Biyombo was the new Ben Wallace?
Don't like the 2nd rounders? Fine, not a dealbreaker. But if HOU is wlling to part iwth four first rounders, and that STILL NOT ENOUGH for some, then why wouldn't I suggest more?
And while I'm busy researching, find me a deal with FOUR firsts, FROM ANY SPORT! Leaf, Gretzky, A-Rod, wherever.
You definitely don't pay attention, especially to what my position is in this Jimmy Butler situation, but the effort in your replies is appreciated, I guess.
I'm not even sure what to do with that bit about Arron Afflalo and Bismack Biyombo. That's about as wild and off base as your supposed seven second-round picks you're insisting on.
- JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
Camden wrote:JasonIsDaMan wrote:Camden wrote:JasonIsDaMan wrote:Q12543 wrote:crazy-canuck wrote:Butler questionable tonight.
Og also sitting for no apparent reason.
Maybe masai is making a last minute move.
Butler/Leonard is a nightmarish wing pairing for opposing teams and they can switch everything. I'm surprised there hasn't been more buzz around Toronto.
LOVE IT!!!
JB/JP/TJ/KBD to TOR for DG/NP/DW/PS/3 1sts/3 swaps/7 Seconds (assuming TOR is 21-30 this year, if not, then 5 2nds)
I know this more me being nitpicky and argumentative than anything else, but it's hard to take some of your posts seriously -- mainly because of your incessant need to include unrealistic pick swaps and ridiculous amount of second-round picks flying everywhere. Find me one deal in basketball history where a team traded seven second-round picks, or even five.
Here's how I got to this. See if you can follow. If you can't, go ahead and print it out to reread later.
HOU offered 4 1sts. That's called an offer. You then ask for more, which is called a counter-offer. Is a three 1st's/ three swap REALLY that much different than the BKN/BOS trade? Also in every trade I have mentioned, JB is clearly the best player, so why wouldn't MIN get something back? And why aren't you going the people who think 4 1st is "not enough" for a guy WHO IS GOING TO LEEEEEEEEEAVE!?!?!
I have a job-slash-life, so I'm not going to go through all these threads, but if I did, are you ABSOLUTELY sure I couldn't find some of your that I find "hard to take seriously"? Weren't you one the guys who thought Aaron Aflalo was the next Bernard King? Or on the strength 3 good playoff games against second teamers that Bismarck Biyombo was the new Ben Wallace?
Don't like the 2nd rounders? Fine, not a dealbreaker. But if HOU is wlling to part iwth four first rounders, and that STILL NOT ENOUGH for some, then why wouldn't I suggest more?
And while I'm busy researching, find me a deal with FOUR firsts, FROM ANY SPORT! Leaf, Gretzky, A-Rod, wherever.
JasonIsDaMan wrote:Camden wrote:JasonIsDaMan wrote:Q12543 wrote:crazy-canuck wrote:Butler questionable tonight.
Og also sitting for no apparent reason.
Maybe masai is making a last minute move.
Butler/Leonard is a nightmarish wing pairing for opposing teams and they can switch everything. I'm surprised there hasn't been more buzz around Toronto.
LOVE IT!!!
JB/JP/TJ/KBD to TOR for DG/NP/DW/PS/3 1sts/3 swaps/7 Seconds (assuming TOR is 21-30 this year, if not, then 5 2nds)
I know this more me being nitpicky and argumentative than anything else, but it's hard to take some of your posts seriously -- mainly because of your incessant need to include unrealistic pick swaps and ridiculous amount of second-round picks flying everywhere. Find me one deal in basketball history where a team traded seven second-round picks, or even five.
Here's how I got to this. See if you can follow. If you can't, go ahead and print it out to reread later.
HOU offered 4 1sts. That's called an offer. You then ask for more, which is called a counter-offer. Is a three 1st's/ three swap REALLY that much different than the BKN/BOS trade? Also in every trade I have mentioned, JB is clearly the best player, so why wouldn't MIN get something back? And why aren't you going the people who think 4 1st is "not enough" for a guy WHO IS GOING TO LEEEEEEEEEAVE!?!?!
I have a job-slash-life, so I'm not going to go through all these threads, but if I did, are you ABSOLUTELY sure I couldn't find some of your that I find "hard to take seriously"? Weren't you one the guys who thought Aaron Aflalo was the next Bernard King? Or on the strength 3 good playoff games against second teamers that Bismarck Biyombo was the new Ben Wallace?
Don't like the 2nd rounders? Fine, not a dealbreaker. But if HOU is wlling to part iwth four first rounders, and that STILL NOT ENOUGH for some, then why wouldn't I suggest more?
And while I'm busy researching, find me a deal with FOUR firsts, FROM ANY SPORT! Leaf, Gretzky, A-Rod, wherever.
You definitely don't pay attention, especially to what my position is in this Jimmy Butler situation, but the effort in your replies is appreciated, I guess.
I'm not even sure what to do with that bit about Arron Afflalo and Bismack Biyombo. That's about as wild and off base as your supposed seven second-round picks you're insisting on.
It really doesn't matter what your position is. You have an offer, you make a counter offer.
As far as Afflalo/Bismarck, is that a yes or a no?
- AbeVigodaLive
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
I'm not a big fan of Jason's proposed trade.
But if the Wolves hold out for one more 2nd rounder in 2076... I'm all in.
But if the Wolves hold out for one more 2nd rounder in 2076... I'm all in.
- Camden [enjin:6601484]
- Posts: 18065
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
Jason wants seven second-round picks and all of the bread pudding. Final offer.
- JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Jimmy Butler Trade Ideas
AbeVigodaLive wrote:I'm not a big fan of Jason's proposed trade.
But if the Wolves hold out for one more 2nd rounder in 2076... I'm all in.
Can only go seven years ahead. A recent change from five. But please, lets complain about 4 firsts not being enough, and then turn around and say 2nd rounders are too much. Make perfect sense.