khans2k5 wrote:TheFuture wrote:Camden wrote:TheFuture wrote:I'm still in favor of my trade idea and I hope it happens.
Rubio/Bazz to the Kings for Temple/Collison/WCS
Rubio's play as of late has settled down my feelings towards moving him, but this topic will always be there while he is under contract. I'd say it is best to simply move forward at this point, and accept that we will not be getting huge value back for him due to his shooting limitations and the impact that has in close games.
Collison gives us a stop gap for the rest of the year at starting pg, not stout defensively, but can run an offense and score. Temple is signed for two more years after this at a reasonable 7mil per, can defend 1-3 well, and is a low usage savvy vet. WCS is a project at this point but has definite promise, and has chemistry with KAT. Options of Collison/Dunn/Tyus at point , LaVine / Temple / Dunn / Wiggins / Rush at the wings , Belly, KAT, Dieng / WCS / Aldrich as our bigs.
Great mix of cap flexibility and veteran play.
That trade would be pretty icky, in my opinion. Not getting back anything that significant. Perhaps a Muhammad for Cayley-Stein deal, but Rubio has more value than what you're proposing. Not to mention, Collison could be had as a free agent in just six months.
Personally, I don't see that Rubio has more value than this. Bazz has near zero value due to his looming free agency.
Collison is a 6 month rental, which is ideal considering our current PG situation. Collison will likely be far too expensive for us to sign as a FA for a potential backup pg. Not to mention we generally do not get above average + players to come here without overpaying. We're potentially another year + away from bucking that trend. Temple is underrated, in my opinion, and would fill two great roles for us (roster flexibility and veteran play), and WCS is the prospect piece. You may disagree but I don't see Bazz/Rubio being some great value vs. Temple/Collison/WCS.
Bazz can be an RFA meaning the team that gets him can match any offer and given the fact he's not a homerun of a pickup he's not getting the overpay to try to prevent the match. He has a lot more than zero value because he can't just walk away during the summer like a normal FA.
I agree with your take on Bazz's value being more than zero although how much more tha zero is debateable espcially in a trade. Your post also makes a solid case for not dealing him at all. His situation right now reminds me a bit of Harkless last year although they bring different things to the floor. If Bazz continues his solid play I would be ok with him getting a contract similar to what Harkless got even though I would rather have Harkless for the same money.