Friday Funkadelic

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
KiwiMatt
Posts: 3903
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Friday Funkadelic

Post by KiwiMatt »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:Williams has to go. He has no place here. Problem is... neither does Chuck Hayes. I don't see any reason to bring Chuck Hayes to the Wolves. He doesn't protect the rim. He can't provide offense with the second unit. He won't help the team win NOW.

As for the 1st rd pick... I don't see it. But if it did happen, it's definitely protected and a ways out.

So, how does that help a team desperate to win NOW?


Agree with you Abe. But Chuck Hayes is Rick Adelman type of player and a great low post passer. Believe Adelman use to start Hayes at the 5 during their stint to together in Houston so I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

D Wills trade value (if he still has any) is heading south fast.He should of been dealt in the off season after his last month of play last season. His trade value will never be higher as a Wolf as it was this last offseason.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10135
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Friday Funkadelic

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

KiwiMatt wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Williams has to go. He has no place here. Problem is... neither does Chuck Hayes. I don't see any reason to bring Chuck Hayes to the Wolves. He doesn't protect the rim. He can't provide offense with the second unit. He won't help the team win NOW.

As for the 1st rd pick... I don't see it. But if it did happen, it's definitely protected and a ways out.

So, how does that help a team desperate to win NOW?


Agree with you Abe. But Chuck Hayes is Rick Adelman type of player and a great low post passer. Believe Adelman use to start Hayes at the 5 during their stint to together in Houston so I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

D Wills trade value (if he still has any) is heading south fast.He should of been dealt in the off season after his last month of play last season. His trade value will never be higher as a Wolf as it was this last offseason.




Wrong. His value was highest before he ever set foot on the court in a Wolves uniform.

I don't know why the team drafted a player who played the same position as the ONLY worthwhile player they had at the time. And I'm usually a proponent of the "drafting for talent" approach when you're a crappy team. Williams was the consensus #2 pick... but wouldn't another team have been happy to move up for him?

Or, to nab him that first season?
User avatar
worldK
Posts: 3461
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Friday Funkadelic

Post by worldK »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
KiwiMatt wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Williams has to go. He has no place here. Problem is... neither does Chuck Hayes. I don't see any reason to bring Chuck Hayes to the Wolves. He doesn't protect the rim. He can't provide offense with the second unit. He won't help the team win NOW.

As for the 1st rd pick... I don't see it. But if it did happen, it's definitely protected and a ways out.

So, how does that help a team desperate to win NOW?


Agree with you Abe. But Chuck Hayes is Rick Adelman type of player and a great low post passer. Believe Adelman use to start Hayes at the 5 during their stint to together in Houston so I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

D Wills trade value (if he still has any) is heading south fast.He should of been dealt in the off season after his last month of play last season. His trade value will never be higher as a Wolf as it was this last offseason.




Wrong. His value was highest before he ever set foot on the court in a Wolves uniform.

I don't know why the team drafted a player who played the same position as the ONLY worthwhile player they had at the time. And I'm usually a proponent of the "drafting for talent" approach when you're a crappy team. Williams was the consensus #2 pick... but wouldn't another team have been happy to move up for him?

Or, to nab him that first season?



I think we over valued williams when we drafted him. He was the consensus #2 pick at that time and there were offers, but i think we talk ourselves into thinking he could be a 3 long term and an all star someday.

Ive spoke about this before, but we should have traded williams after his rookie season. We had a good look at him and he could still be traded based on promise and potential back then with excuses like he was coming off a lockout with no training camp etc.

Back then, I was hoping that we trade him to sacramento for their 5th pick or to golden state for their 7th pick and draft andre drummond or harisson barnes with the pick. I believe that that would have a good chance of happening then. That would have made our team much better now and in the long run. Now were talking about chuck hayes. sigh
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10135
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Friday Funkadelic

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

I don't understand the Chuck Hayes thing. At all.

I also don't understand why people are thinking Turiaf is a difference maker. If anything, they're the same type of caretaker backup centers.

Having both is redundant.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Friday Funkadelic

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

worldK wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
KiwiMatt wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Williams has to go. He has no place here. Problem is... neither does Chuck Hayes. I don't see any reason to bring Chuck Hayes to the Wolves. He doesn't protect the rim. He can't provide offense with the second unit. He won't help the team win NOW.

As for the 1st rd pick... I don't see it. But if it did happen, it's definitely protected and a ways out.

So, how does that help a team desperate to win NOW?


Agree with you Abe. But Chuck Hayes is Rick Adelman type of player and a great low post passer. Believe Adelman use to start Hayes at the 5 during their stint to together in Houston so I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

D Wills trade value (if he still has any) is heading south fast.He should of been dealt in the off season after his last month of play last season. His trade value will never be higher as a Wolf as it was this last offseason.




Wrong. His value was highest before he ever set foot on the court in a Wolves uniform.

I don't know why the team drafted a player who played the same position as the ONLY worthwhile player they had at the time. And I'm usually a proponent of the "drafting for talent" approach when you're a crappy team. Williams was the consensus #2 pick... but wouldn't another team have been happy to move up for him?

Or, to nab him that first season?



I think we over valued williams when we drafted him. He was the consensus #2 pick at that time and there were offers, but i think we talk ourselves into thinking he could be a 3 long term and an all star someday.

Ive spoke about this before, but we should have traded williams after his rookie season. We had a good look at him and he could still be traded based on promise and potential back then with excuses like he was coming off a lockout with no training camp etc.

Back then, I was hoping that we trade him to sacramento for their 5th pick or to golden state for their 7th pick and draft andre drummond or harisson barnes with the pick. I believe that that would have a good chance of happening then. That would have made our team much better now and in the long run. Now were talking about chuck hayes. sigh


Wrong draft. Lol you're thinking of the 2012 draft in which we didn't have a pick. In 2011, the best we could have done was trade back and take Klay Thompson or reach on Vucevic.
User avatar
worldK
Posts: 3461
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Friday Funkadelic

Post by worldK »

Camden0916 wrote:
worldK wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
KiwiMatt wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Williams has to go. He has no place here. Problem is... neither does Chuck Hayes. I don't see any reason to bring Chuck Hayes to the Wolves. He doesn't protect the rim. He can't provide offense with the second unit. He won't help the team win NOW.

As for the 1st rd pick... I don't see it. But if it did happen, it's definitely protected and a ways out.

So, how does that help a team desperate to win NOW?


Agree with you Abe. But Chuck Hayes is Rick Adelman type of player and a great low post passer. Believe Adelman use to start Hayes at the 5 during their stint to together in Houston so I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

D Wills trade value (if he still has any) is heading south fast.He should of been dealt in the off season after his last month of play last season. His trade value will never be higher as a Wolf as it was this last offseason.




Wrong. His value was highest before he ever set foot on the court in a Wolves uniform.

I don't know why the team drafted a player who played the same position as the ONLY worthwhile player they had at the time. And I'm usually a proponent of the "drafting for talent" approach when you're a crappy team. Williams was the consensus #2 pick... but wouldn't another team have been happy to move up for him?

Or, to nab him that first season?



I think we over valued williams when we drafted him. He was the consensus #2 pick at that time and there were offers, but i think we talk ourselves into thinking he could be a 3 long term and an all star someday.

Ive spoke about this before, but we should have traded williams after his rookie season. We had a good look at him and he could still be traded based on promise and potential back then with excuses like he was coming off a lockout with no training camp etc.

Back then, I was hoping that we trade him to sacramento for their 5th pick or to golden state for their 7th pick and draft andre drummond or harisson barnes with the pick. I believe that that would have a good chance of happening then. That would have made our team much better now and in the long run. Now were talking about chuck hayes. sigh


Wrong draft. Lol you're thinking of the 2012 draft in which we didn't have a pick. In 2011, the best we could have done was trade back and take Klay Thompson or reac
h on Vucevic.


Lol cam, you need to read my post again. I said trade dw AFTER his rookie season. To either sac or gs for the 5th or 7th pick And draft drummond or barnes


Cam, you need to read my post before reacting :)
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Friday Funkadelic

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

worldK wrote:
Camden0916 wrote:
worldK wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
KiwiMatt wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Williams has to go. He has no place here. Problem is... neither does Chuck Hayes. I don't see any reason to bring Chuck Hayes to the Wolves. He doesn't protect the rim. He can't provide offense with the second unit. He won't help the team win NOW.

As for the 1st rd pick... I don't see it. But if it did happen, it's definitely protected and a ways out.

So, how does that help a team desperate to win NOW?


Agree with you Abe. But Chuck Hayes is Rick Adelman type of player and a great low post passer. Believe Adelman use to start Hayes at the 5 during their stint to together in Houston so I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

D Wills trade value (if he still has any) is heading south fast.He should of been dealt in the off season after his last month of play last season. His trade value will never be higher as a Wolf as it was this last offseason.




Wrong. His value was highest before he ever set foot on the court in a Wolves uniform.

I don't know why the team drafted a player who played the same position as the ONLY worthwhile player they had at the time. And I'm usually a proponent of the "drafting for talent" approach when you're a crappy team. Williams was the consensus #2 pick... but wouldn't another team have been happy to move up for him?

Or, to nab him that first season?



I think we over valued williams when we drafted him. He was the consensus #2 pick at that time and there were offers, but i think we talk ourselves into thinking he could be a 3 long term and an all star someday.

Ive spoke about this before, but we should have traded williams after his rookie season. We had a good look at him and he could still be traded based on promise and potential back then with excuses like he was coming off a lockout with no training camp etc.

Back then, I was hoping that we trade him to sacramento for their 5th pick or to golden state for their 7th pick and draft andre drummond or harisson barnes with the pick. I believe that that would have a good chance of happening then. That would have made our team much better now and in the long run. Now were talking about chuck hayes. sigh


Wrong draft. Lol you're thinking of the 2012 draft in which we didn't have a pick. In 2011, the best we could have done was trade back and take Klay Thompson or reac
h on Vucevic.


Lol cam, you need to read my post again. I said trade dw AFTER his rookie season. To either sac or gs for the 5th or 7th pick And draft drummond or barnes


Cam, you need to read my post before reacting :)


For some reason, I completely skipped over:

"Ive spoke about this before, but we should have traded williams after his rookie season. We had a good look at him and he could still be traded based on promise and potential back then with excuses like he was coming off a lockout with no training camp etc."

My apologies. I don't think we would have gotten a lottery pick for him after his rookie season, though. I don't think he showed enough for teams to want to make that trade.
User avatar
worldK
Posts: 3461
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Friday Funkadelic

Post by worldK »

Camden0916 wrote:
worldK wrote:
Camden0916 wrote:
worldK wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
KiwiMatt wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:Williams has to go. He has no place here. Problem is... neither does Chuck Hayes. I don't see any reason to bring Chuck Hayes to the Wolves. He doesn't protect the rim. He can't provide offense with the second unit. He won't help the team win NOW.

As for the 1st rd pick... I don't see it. But if it did happen, it's definitely protected and a ways out.

So, how does that help a team desperate to win NOW?


Agree with you Abe. But Chuck Hayes is Rick Adelman type of player and a great low post passer. Believe Adelman use to start Hayes at the 5 during their stint to together in Houston so I certainly wouldn't put it past him.

D Wills trade value (if he still has any) is heading south fast.He should of been dealt in the off season after his last month of play last season. His trade value will never be higher as a Wolf as it was this last offseason.




Wrong. His value was highest before he ever set foot on the court in a Wolves uniform.

I don't know why the team drafted a player who played the same position as the ONLY worthwhile player they had at the time. And I'm usually a proponent of the "drafting for talent" approach when you're a crappy team. Williams was the consensus #2 pick... but wouldn't another team have been happy to move up for him?

Or, to nab him that first season?



I think we over valued williams when we drafted him. He was the consensus #2 pick at that time and there were offers, but i think we talk ourselves into thinking he could be a 3 long term and an all star someday.

Ive spoke about this before, but we should have traded williams after his rookie season. We had a good look at him and he could still be traded based on promise and potential back then with excuses like he was coming off a lockout with no training camp etc.

Back then, I was hoping that we trade him to sacramento for their 5th pick or to golden state for their 7th pick and draft andre drummond or harisson barnes with the pick. I believe that that would have a good chance of happening then. That would have made our team much better now and in the long run. Now were talking about chuck hayes. sigh


Wrong draft. Lol you're thinking of the 2012 draft in which we didn't have a pick. In 2011, the best we could have done was trade back and take Klay Thompson or reac
h on Vucevic.


Lol cam, you need to read my post again. I said trade dw AFTER his rookie season. To either sac or gs for the 5th or 7th pick And draft drummond or barnes


Cam, you need to read my post before reacting :)


For some reason, I completely skipped over:

"Ive spoke about this before, but we should have traded williams after his rookie season. We had a good look at him and he could still be traded based on promise and potential back then with excuses like he was coming off a lockout with no training camp etc."

My apologies. I don't think we would have gotten a lottery pick for him after his rookie season, though. I don't think he showed enough for teams to want to make that trade.


No problem cam.

I actually think thats a possible scenario. Dw still has positive value after his rookie season. Considering sac drafted robinson who isnt a better prospect than dw then, trading for dw would have been an option for them. The sad thing is right now, chuck hayes is who were talking about as possible targets in a dw trade
Post Reply