Conley: A
Ant: C+
Mcdaniels: N/A
Kat: A+
Gobert: B-
Slow Mo: B-
Naz: D+
Naw: C
Shake: B-
Brown: C
Finch: B+
Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
- Crazysauce
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
Sorry but I don't think any players deserve an A after tonights debacle.
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
KAT: A
Conley: A
Shake: B+
Rudy: B-
Kyle: B-
Ant: C
TB: C
Jaden: C
NAW: D
Naz: D
Finch: D
Conley: A
Shake: B+
Rudy: B-
Kyle: B-
Ant: C
TB: C
Jaden: C
NAW: D
Naz: D
Finch: D
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
They won.Crazysauce wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:46 pm Sorry but I don't think any players deserve an A after tonights debacle.
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
Kat deserved the A tonight. He kept us in it all game and he led us in taking the lead in the 4th. This game also shows why you don’t trade Kat now. He is an elite level scorer and in nights like these were ant doesnt have it going, he can keep us close enough that we can steal a win in the 4th given our talent.
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
There is a narrative that Ant "didn't have it going" that is less than the truth. The Warriors were sending 2 or more players at him the entire game. Kerr wasn't going to allow Ant to take over the game. I think Ant had a good game and played within himself for the most part. He made a few "youth inspired" pass attempts that lead to 5 turnovers, but he was 7-16 from the field, 3-6 from deep, had 4 reb, 4 assists, and 3 steals. He did fall asleep on a couple backdoor cuts, but that is something the Warriors do to everyone. Kat went 12-26 for the game. Very inefficient but he made the plays that were needed.
- Wolvesfan21
- Posts: 3701
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 12:00 am
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
I think Ant was pretty solid also. He wasn't up to his standard for sure. BTW 7/16 is 43.75%. Kat was better 12/26 at 46.15% (not what I would say very inefficient). I think we expect more from Ant and less from Karl at this point and could be slightly skewed in the grades.DNatagal wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:37 am There is a narrative that Ant "didn't have it going" that is less than the truth. The Warriors were sending 2 or more players at him the entire game. Kerr wasn't going to allow Ant to take over the game. I think Ant had a good game and played within himself for the most part. He made a few "youth inspired" pass attempts that lead to 5 turnovers, but he was 7-16 from the field, 3-6 from deep, had 4 reb, 4 assists, and 3 steals. He did fall asleep on a couple backdoor cuts, but that is something the Warriors do to everyone. Kat went 12-26 for the game. Very inefficient but he made the plays that were needed.
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
Love this new feature, Kek...thanks for initiating!
I see the D grades for Naz and don't agree. I give him a D on defense, but his efficient 10 points on only 5 shots kept us in the game. 44.2% 3-point shooting now on the year!
I see the D grades for Naz and don't agree. I give him a D on defense, but his efficient 10 points on only 5 shots kept us in the game. 44.2% 3-point shooting now on the year!
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
So the reason I gave him a D+ was it was the old Naz on defense last night. Couldn’t contain the defender, struggled boxing out and then he fouled when he got beat. Then on offense he had a good first stint but after that he had butterfingers on offense.
Naz has been fantastic this year last night in my opinion was not his best
Re: Kekgeek grades G10 vs Warriors
This is where Ant gets punished a little bit because he is our star. I expect our star when the team is playing poorly unexpired basketball to pull the team out of the rut. He failed to do that last night. Kat carried. Ant was not great off ball Defending last night either. Now he is a star for a reason and helped close the game. I want to say I don’t think C grades are bad grades, he just could have been a lot better last night. Also you know Ant is a star when he puts up those numbers and I don’t think he played greatWolvesfan21 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:54 amI think Ant was pretty solid also. He wasn't up to his standard for sure. BTW 7/16 is 43.75%. Kat was better 12/26 at 46.15% (not what I would say very inefficient). I think we expect more from Ant and less from Karl at this point and could be slightly skewed in the grades.DNatagal wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 8:37 am There is a narrative that Ant "didn't have it going" that is less than the truth. The Warriors were sending 2 or more players at him the entire game. Kerr wasn't going to allow Ant to take over the game. I think Ant had a good game and played within himself for the most part. He made a few "youth inspired" pass attempts that lead to 5 turnovers, but he was 7-16 from the field, 3-6 from deep, had 4 reb, 4 assists, and 3 steals. He did fall asleep on a couple backdoor cuts, but that is something the Warriors do to everyone. Kat went 12-26 for the game. Very inefficient but he made the plays that were needed.