Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14517
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by kekgeek »

Conley: C
Ant: A-
Mcdaniels: A
Kat: B-
Gobert: A+
Naz: B
Slow Mo: B
Naw: B

Finch: A

Fun game and good run. We are good
User avatar
WildWolf2813
Posts: 3466
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by WildWolf2813 »

if this franchise had any dreams of eschewing PG to just let Ant be the primary decision, give up those dreams.
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by thedoper »

WildWolf2813 wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:43 pm if this franchise had any dreams of eschewing PG to just let Ant be the primary decision, give up those dreams.
Jaylen Clark is my new dream.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

We don't win without Ant, and it's great to always have the best athlete on the floor. But I can't give him an "A-" tonight. Mind numbing bad decisions and turnovers were too prevalent. Give him a straight B.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14517
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by kekgeek »

Coolbreeze44 wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:49 pm We don't win without Ant, and it's great to always have the best athlete on the floor. But I can't give him an "A-" tonight. Mind numbing bad decisions and turnovers were too prevalent. Give him a straight B.
He’s a tough guy to judge. Hard for me to go lower than an A- when he goes 33/8/6 on great efficiency everywhere. He’s very frustrating to watch at times and that’s why he was knocked but anyone else did what he did tonight we would give them an A.

I get where you are coming from though
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

kekgeek wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:52 pm
Coolbreeze44 wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:49 pm We don't win without Ant, and it's great to always have the best athlete on the floor. But I can't give him an "A-" tonight. Mind numbing bad decisions and turnovers were too prevalent. Give him a straight B.
He’s a tough guy to judge. Hard for me to go lower than an A- when he goes 33/8/6 on great efficiency everywhere. He’s very frustrating to watch at times and that’s why he was knocked but anyone else did what he did tonight we would give them an A.

I get where you are coming from though
I get your points too, but as you pointed out early in the game, 6 straight possessions without giving up the ball. Then you had the turnovers at very inopportune times. I've seen him be a lot better.
User avatar
Q-is-here
Posts: 7578
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by Q-is-here »

thedoper wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:46 pm
WildWolf2813 wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:43 pm if this franchise had any dreams of eschewing PG to just let Ant be the primary decision, give up those dreams.
Jaylen Clark is my new dream.
Is he even a PG?
User avatar
Q-is-here
Posts: 7578
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by Q-is-here »

I think I'd give McDaniels an A even if he had goose eggs across every other statistical category. Him and Rudy made it really difficult on their Big Three.
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by thedoper »

Q-is-here wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 10:03 pm
thedoper wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:46 pm
WildWolf2813 wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:43 pm if this franchise had any dreams of eschewing PG to just let Ant be the primary decision, give up those dreams.
Jaylen Clark is my new dream.
Is he even a PG?
Dream with me Q. Apparently he is obsessed with Conley only from an interview early in the year. If we had a defensive 1st PG who could distribute our long term future would be bright. This is the type of move where we will see if Tim Connelly can pay off. Im sure he will not pan out but I am a delusional Wolves fan.
User avatar
Q-is-here
Posts: 7578
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:00 am

Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers

Post by Q-is-here »

thedoper wrote: Mon Jan 15, 2024 1:54 am
Q-is-here wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 10:03 pm
thedoper wrote: Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:46 pm

Jaylen Clark is my new dream.
Is he even a PG?
Dream with me Q. Apparently he is obsessed with Conley only from an interview early in the year. If we had a defensive 1st PG who could distribute our long term future would be bright. This is the type of move where we will see if Tim Connelly can pay off. Im sure he will not pan out but I am a delusional Wolves fan.
Ha, OK...I'd agree with your dream scenario if Ant showed any ability whatsoever to run an offense. Or if we had a Draymond Green-like big that could do it. But for the foreseeable future, we need a pure point guard on the floor at nearly all times. That's not going to be Jaylen Clark.

But....I could see him as NAW 2.0 if he shows he can hit the open 3.
Post Reply