Conley: C
Ant: A-
Mcdaniels: A
Kat: B-
Gobert: A+
Naz: B
Slow Mo: B
Naw: B
Finch: A
Fun game and good run. We are good
Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
- WildWolf2813
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
if this franchise had any dreams of eschewing PG to just let Ant be the primary decision, give up those dreams.
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
Jaylen Clark is my new dream.WildWolf2813 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:43 pm if this franchise had any dreams of eschewing PG to just let Ant be the primary decision, give up those dreams.
- Coolbreeze44
- Posts: 13192
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
We don't win without Ant, and it's great to always have the best athlete on the floor. But I can't give him an "A-" tonight. Mind numbing bad decisions and turnovers were too prevalent. Give him a straight B.
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
He’s a tough guy to judge. Hard for me to go lower than an A- when he goes 33/8/6 on great efficiency everywhere. He’s very frustrating to watch at times and that’s why he was knocked but anyone else did what he did tonight we would give them an A.Coolbreeze44 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:49 pm We don't win without Ant, and it's great to always have the best athlete on the floor. But I can't give him an "A-" tonight. Mind numbing bad decisions and turnovers were too prevalent. Give him a straight B.
I get where you are coming from though
- Coolbreeze44
- Posts: 13192
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
I get your points too, but as you pointed out early in the game, 6 straight possessions without giving up the ball. Then you had the turnovers at very inopportune times. I've seen him be a lot better.kekgeek wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:52 pmHe’s a tough guy to judge. Hard for me to go lower than an A- when he goes 33/8/6 on great efficiency everywhere. He’s very frustrating to watch at times and that’s why he was knocked but anyone else did what he did tonight we would give them an A.Coolbreeze44 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:49 pm We don't win without Ant, and it's great to always have the best athlete on the floor. But I can't give him an "A-" tonight. Mind numbing bad decisions and turnovers were too prevalent. Give him a straight B.
I get where you are coming from though
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
Is he even a PG?thedoper wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:46 pmJaylen Clark is my new dream.WildWolf2813 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2024 8:43 pm if this franchise had any dreams of eschewing PG to just let Ant be the primary decision, give up those dreams.
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
I think I'd give McDaniels an A even if he had goose eggs across every other statistical category. Him and Rudy made it really difficult on their Big Three.
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
Dream with me Q. Apparently he is obsessed with Conley only from an interview early in the year. If we had a defensive 1st PG who could distribute our long term future would be bright. This is the type of move where we will see if Tim Connelly can pay off. Im sure he will not pan out but I am a delusional Wolves fan.
Re: Kekgeek grades G39 vs Clippers
Ha, OK...I'd agree with your dream scenario if Ant showed any ability whatsoever to run an offense. Or if we had a Draymond Green-like big that could do it. But for the foreseeable future, we need a pure point guard on the floor at nearly all times. That's not going to be Jaylen Clark.thedoper wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2024 1:54 amDream with me Q. Apparently he is obsessed with Conley only from an interview early in the year. If we had a defensive 1st PG who could distribute our long term future would be bright. This is the type of move where we will see if Tim Connelly can pay off. Im sure he will not pan out but I am a delusional Wolves fan.
But....I could see him as NAW 2.0 if he shows he can hit the open 3.