alexftbl8181 wrote:48 million over 4 years. Same as Ty Lawson
I have no issue with this, Ricky is worth that much imo and if people think he'll take less just because "we overpaid Pek" they are delusional.
alexftbl8181 wrote:48 million over 4 years. Same as Ty Lawson
BloopOracle wrote:alexftbl8181 wrote:48 million over 4 years. Same as Ty Lawson
I have no issue with this, Ricky is worth that much imo and if people think he'll take less just because "we overpaid Pek" they are delusional.
Hicks123 wrote:BloopOracle wrote:alexftbl8181 wrote:48 million over 4 years. Same as Ty Lawson
I have no issue with this, Ricky is worth that much imo and if people think he'll take less just because "we overpaid Pek" they are delusional.
And I think those that think Ricky deserves $48M are off their rocker. I fully understand utilizing comparisons like Lawson to determine value, but I would also be very cautious to pay a guy that the majority on this board consider the 10th-15th best PG that much money. Sometimes, the best decision is to walk away. Lawson is not worth $48M either.
And while Pek doesn't fit our system, he is still firmly in the 6-8 range of centers in the NBA. Good skill set with a defensive 4 next to him....as we all know. Potentially even worth $12M in the right system.
kms789 wrote:There are several Point Guards around Rubio's level in the Playoffs right now, guys in the 10-20 range of point guards. Conley ($8mil), Teague ($8mil), Lowry ($6mil), Calderon ($7mil), Chalmers ($4mil), Hill ($8mil), Lin ($8mil average). You could even throw in another playoff quality team and add Dragic (7mil). Those are guys not on their rookie contracts, so it excludes Beverley, Lillard, and Walker who are getting paid significantly less.
Looking at that list, if you are paying Rubio north of $10 million, you're almost guaranteeing mediocrity because he needs to be surrounded with very good players. At best, he's a 3rd wheel, but that might be a stretch because he's so difficult to utilize in 4th quarter situations.