Good read on Shabazz and Rubio
- bleedspeed
- Posts: 8162
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Good read on Shabazz and Rubio
http://www.1500espn.com/sportswire/Numbers_Game_On_what_planet_were_Wolves_good_enough_to_sit_Shabazz022614
- longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
- Posts: 9432
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Good read on Shabazz and Rubio
Thanks bleedspeed. Mackey sees the two things that most of us on this board are so painfully aware of also. Adelman's poor choices created a lost season for the Wolves that didn't have to be lost.
- kms789 [enjin:6694798]
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Good read on Shabazz and Rubio
My only gripe with this is he uses On/Off numbers to say Rubio is better than Barea. That really isn't fair considering Rubio plays with Love/Pek/Martin/Brewer and Barea plays with a D-League caliber bench.
I mean, Rubio is better than Barea, but that's not a good stat to prove it.
I mean, Rubio is better than Barea, but that's not a good stat to prove it.
- markkbu [enjin:6588958]
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Good read on Shabazz and Rubio
kms789 wrote:My only gripe with this is he uses On/Off numbers to say Rubio is better than Barea. That really isn't fair considering Rubio plays with Love/Pek/Martin/Brewer and Barea plays with a D-League caliber bench.
I mean, Rubio is better than Barea, but that's not a good stat to prove it.
Agree....that is a very poor way to prove that point
- The Rage Monster [enjin:8010341]
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Good read on Shabazz and Rubio
markkbu wrote:kms789 wrote:My only gripe with this is he uses On/Off numbers to say Rubio is better than Barea. That really isn't fair considering Rubio plays with Love/Pek/Martin/Brewer and Barea plays with a D-League caliber bench.
I mean, Rubio is better than Barea, but that's not a good stat to prove it.
Agree....that is a very poor way to prove that point
It might not be the best method for comparison because other factors come into play but I think it was the simplest method that gets to main point that despite his shooting everyone still plays better with Rubio than they do with Barea.
Looking at 5 man units on 82 games might have been the better option. Given they're playing with the starters: Martin, Brewer, Love, and Pek are the other 4 on the court, the eFG% with Rubio is 47% and with Barea it is 40%.
- markkbu [enjin:6588958]
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Good read on Shabazz and Rubio
The Rage Monster wrote:markkbu wrote:kms789 wrote:My only gripe with this is he uses On/Off numbers to say Rubio is better than Barea. That really isn't fair considering Rubio plays with Love/Pek/Martin/Brewer and Barea plays with a D-League caliber bench.
I mean, Rubio is better than Barea, but that's not a good stat to prove it.
Agree....that is a very poor way to prove that point
It might not be the best method for comparison because other factors come into play but I think it was the simplest method that gets to main point that despite his shooting everyone still plays better with Rubio than they do with Barea.
Looking at 5 man units on 82 games might have been the better option. Given they're playing with the starters: Martin, Brewer, Love, and Pek are the other 4 on the court, the eFG% with Rubio is 47% and with Barea it is 40%.
Yes, Rage, I think that you method for proving his point is far more effective.